Page 16 of 16 FirstFirst ... 6141516
Results 151 to 160 of 160

Thread: Argumentation ethics: the ultimate justification of capitalism over socialism?

  1. #151
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    6,335

    As S of I would be private company owned by the public, not state owned, any ideas on how the profits set aside for local people could be administered, local gov, trusts or ......

  2. #152
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    5,080

    Quote Originally Posted by fiannafailure View Post
    As S of I would be private company owned by the public, not state owned, any ideas on how the profits set aside for local people could be administered, local gov, trusts or ......
    Plenty of them! Have you checked out the participatory budgetting system used in Porto Alegre that has spread throughout the world in a v short space of time...

    Participatory budgeting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  3. #153
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    6,335

    No but I will, Thank you, now back to the crowds?, could something along the same lines not be proposed as an end to the impasse

  4. #154
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    5,080

    Quote Originally Posted by fiannafailure View Post
    No but I will, Thank you, now back to the crowds?, could something along the same lines not be proposed as an end to the impasse
    Yeah course it could. The establishment of more and better democratic mechanisms ANYWHERE will help solve conflicts.

    Democracy enables education on different points of view, real discussion and problem-solving and a feeling that the best solution has been reached. It is only when people feel that something is "unfair" or they have been "hard done by" that they will go outside official mechanisms.

  5. #155
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    6,335

    Quote Originally Posted by sarahj View Post
    Yeah course it could. The establishment of more and better democratic mechanisms ANYWHERE will help solve conflicts.

    Democracy enables education on different points of view, real discussion and problem-solving and a feeling that the best solution has been reached. It is only when people feel that something is "unfair" or they have been "hard done by" that they will go outside official mechanisms.
    So lets get started doing it not talking about it, perhaps TV3 or RTE would air a coherent proposal to shell and the gov. PM me if I can help

  6. #156
    Politics.ie Regular 20000miles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Blumenau
    Posts
    3,656

    Quote Originally Posted by sarahj View Post
    If the resources are USED by people but not considered owned, then you have stolen the ability to use them from those people. Those people were sharing and didn't feel any need to appropriate the resources for private use until the first person "claimed" them.

    The first person to "claim" any resource is a thief.
    To even consider a concept such as theft you have to consider ownership. The person who appropriates unowned resources is making noone worse off, as others were free to appropriate them themselves - but chose not to.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ¦
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  7. #157
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    5,080

    Quote Originally Posted by 20000miles View Post
    To even consider a concept such as theft you have to consider ownership. The person who appropriates unowned resources is making noone worse off, as others were free to appropriate them themselves - but chose not to.
    Chose not to because ownership was understood as unnecessary...until someone came along and took it away.

    You only need property rights if other people are going to try to take property.

  8. #158
    Politics.ie Regular 20000miles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Blumenau
    Posts
    3,656

    You need property rights to prevent interposonal conflict.

    This was the point of my first post after all!

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ¦
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  9. #159
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    5,080

    Quote Originally Posted by 20000miles View Post
    You need property rights to prevent interposonal conflict.

    This was the point of my first post after all!
    No - property rights enhance the levels of interpersonal conflict.

    COOPERATION (by its very definition) prevents interpersonal conflict.

  10. #160
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,836

    Quote Originally Posted by sarahj View Post
    Haven't you seen the gardai getting involved in the Shell fiasco in the west? Or in Tara?
    These came to mind, yes.

    But why are guardi involved technically? To protect property rights, or to make sure piece is kept as at demonstrations, marches, and intervene when they feel it's necessary; or for what exact reason?
    I don't know really.

Page 16 of 16 FirstFirst ... 6141516

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 57
    Last Post: 20th March 2009, 10:46 AM
  2. The PSA: The ultimate Quango madness?
    By michael1965 in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 16th September 2008, 06:32 PM
  3. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11th October 2007, 04:26 PM
  4. Socialism or two-tier capitalism?
    By realpolitic in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 470
    Last Post: 1st July 2007, 05:20 PM