Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 95

Thread: IBEC seeks 3% cut in welfare payments

  1. #31
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In negative equity.
    Posts
    3,356

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bobo View Post
    The people who benifited from the celtic tiger are the ones who should now pay for the celtic carcus.
    The same people who always paid will continue to do so -the private sector PAYE workers - aka the Shamrock Lemmings (is that getting too like david mcwilliams?). Does any party represent these people well? I don't think so.

  2. #32
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ballybay
    Posts
    766

    IBEC are leeches who want to suck the blood of the lower classes in Irish society.

  3. #33
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    2,425

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bobo View Post
    The people who benifited from the celtic tiger are the ones who should now pay for the celtic carcus.
    Everyone benefitted from the celtic tiger - income taxes were reduced massively across the board, welfare payments were increased massively across the board, state pensions were increased massively across the board, pay was increased massively across the board.

    Sure profit also increased massively and wealth increased massively too - I'm not suggesting we ignore that fact . . . but let's not forget the other facts also.

  4. #34
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    11,510

    Quote Originally Posted by NewsBot View Post
    Employers' body IBEC has called for social welfare payments to be reduced by 3% in next week's Budget.

    More from RTE.ie...
    Of course, its what they do.
    Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.

    George Will

  5. #35
    Politics.ie Member Big Bobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,569

    Quote Originally Posted by adrem View Post
    Everyone benefitted from the celtic tiger - income taxes were reduced massively across the board, welfare payments were increased massively across the board, state pensions were increased massively across the board, pay was increased massively across the board.

    Sure profit also increased massively and wealth increased massively too - I'm not suggesting we ignore that fact . . . but let's not forget the other facts also.
    Some people benifited alot more than others and the budget should reflect that.

  6. #36
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    2,800

    Quote Originally Posted by Question R24U View Post
    That is not enough. We need to cut and reform social welfare for two reasons- 1. We can't afford to pay 21bn in social welfare when revenue receipts are 34bn and 2. The 50 plus Social welfare programmes result in utter dependence on the state for those trapped by it.
    It should be replaced by a lower paid Basic Income payment without conditions, except for residence, for those who do not pay income tax eg back to education and training restrictions lifted. Ditto on starting new businesses.. It would also reduce the need for over 2000 administrators.
    I agree

    I would suggest INCREASING Job Seekers Benefit to approx €300 per week and keep it at that level for 3 years, this will help those who have worked, want to work but have lost their jobs, then DECREASE Job Seekers Allowance to approx €66, i.e. UK level; so that those who have never worked now have the incentive to actually seek work

  7. #37
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    58

    Agree with you, why cut social welfare, when most of the people on it now are people who have worked all their lives and paid taxes mostly at the higher rate and now they are reduced to living on €204 a week due to no fault of their own. This will be a disgrace if they cut social welfare. People are living in fear of losing jobs and this is what they have to look forward to. People who have paid into this should not be punished for the big wigs mistakes.

  8. #38
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,311

    Quote Originally Posted by bormotello View Post
    Those vouchers can be used only to pay taxes(corporate and income for employees) in rate one to one. If somebody want to make a market and sell those vouchers to companies to pay taxes, it is fine.
    The market value of those vouchers would be 1:1. Even if 100% of SW was in vouchers, the government taxes in more in taxes than is given out for SW.

    Buy Irish vouchers would violate EU law anyway. You could probably get away with it by requiring purchases to be made in Ireland. This would help with the fraud.

    Ofc, since they can be used in Ireland, people could accept them for payment in other EU countries and then sell them to Irish people.

  9. #39
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,267

    Quote Originally Posted by anlkestony View Post
    IBEC are leeches who want to suck the blood of the lower classes in Irish society.
    Yeah, employers are bsatards...we'd be far better off if we didn't have any employers at all.
    A demagogue is someone who will preach doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.

  10. #40
    Politics.ie Regular bormotello's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,189

    Quote Originally Posted by ivnryn View Post
    The market value of those vouchers would be 1:1. Even if 100% of SW was in vouchers, the government taxes in more in taxes than is given out for SW.
    No, voucher can be used only to taxes to government. What is the reason to buy vouchers 1:1 if you can pay taxes by cash without any extra transaction? It will make sense only if you could save more then extra transactions. I would estimate that less then 0.7.

    Quote Originally Posted by ivnryn View Post
    Buy Irish vouchers would violate EU law anyway. You could probably get away with it by requiring purchases to be made in Ireland. This would help with the fraud.
    I know.
    But if it will be worded properly, EU can spend five years, trying to proof that it is wrong.
    For example
    Can Ireland reduce welfare payments without EU permission? – Yes
    Can Ireland compensate reduction of welfare by vouchers? – Yes
    Can Ireland stimulate own economy, as France or other EU country? – Yes

    Those vouchers are only to help unemployed people. Those vouchers is not a parallel currency (officially).
    Must be list of companies, which can accept those vouchers. Those companies must hire only people, which are recipients of Irish welfare, to prevent influx of extra eastern-europeans. Local eastern-europeans can be accepted, because they will be removed from dole.
    I would estimate that taxes will be reduced by 5Bn, but welfare bill also will be reduced by the same amount. But you will start to get less people on welfare. So – in one stage it will start to make a profit.

Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Linking Social Welfare Payments to Cost of Living by Area
    By geraghd in forum Health and Social Affairs
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 1st July 2009, 07:50 PM
  2. More scaremongering from IBEC
    By eurosceptic in forum Lisbon Treaty
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 18th June 2009, 05:15 PM
  3. Welfare payments...benefits too generous?
    By Seán Mac Stiofán in forum Economy
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 21st April 2009, 12:46 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17th February 2009, 03:23 PM
  5. Social Welfare Payments into Bank Account
    By odie1kanobe in forum Culture & Community
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 3rd January 2008, 05:28 PM