Page 11 of 26 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 260

Thread: Are we reverting to Socialism again?

  1. #101
    Politics.ie Regular bob3344's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,486

    It is natural for human beings to work and create wealth. Society will never reach the stage where people do not wish to work.
    Newsflash bobo - we have already reached the stage where some people do not wish to work.

    It is generally the least skilled part of the population which has this sense of absolute entitlement - I deserve a free house, free dole payments, free medical card, free childrens allowances, etc etc etc.

    Look at the UK - that is where we will be in 20 years. Read a story in the UK Times where some MP went out talking to unemployed kids from his community. They told him that the absolute minimum they would work for was over £300 per week as they got nearly £300 for doing nothing. His response ? "You can't read or write, you've got no qualifications - what job do you expect to get exactly ?". They didn't have a clue.

  2. #102
    Politics.ie Regular bormotello's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,846

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bobo View Post
    as Marx said

    The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
    It was valid 100 years ago. Now proletariat has been mostly converted into middle-class (Lumpenproletariat in Marx defition), it has what to lose, houses, cars etc.
    Only minority of society, mostly people, which don’t want to work and looking for excuses can fall into this definitioon.

  3. #103
    Politics.ie Member Big Bobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,569

    Quote Originally Posted by bormotello View Post
    It was valid 100 years ago. Now proletariat has been mostly converted into middle-class (Lumpenproletariat in Marx defition), it has what to lose, houses, cars etc.
    Only minority of society, mostly people, which don’t want to work and looking for excuses can fall into this definitioon.
    The Lumpenproletariet are not middle class

    And just because working class people were declared middle class in the 80/90s it doesn't make it so.

    I don't wish to be rude but I suggest you educate yourself more on the topic at hand.

  4. #104
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    4,158

    Capitalism has failed and needs to quickly reinvent itself or god knows what comes next. No point going an a scare rant about commies etc.
    The USA has really run into the ground morally, politically, culturally, militarily and now economically. The people who think the current model is the best better start putting some ideas in front of the general public that do not blame everyone else and seek only to make excuses. Otherwise we might have more clare dalys to deal with than would be funny.
    Most people are worried about their own situation more that any ideological debate of political loyalty. Thats why cowen keeps getting it wrong, he just does not understand how ordinary people relate to politics. He never even had to get elected in a cumann let alone fight a grass roots local election. Politics better re-connect very quickly or the system will start to fail.

  5. #105
    Politics.ie Regular bormotello's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,846

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bobo View Post
    The Lumpenproletariet are not middle class
    Sorry for confusion, I didn’t read Marx for long time .
    Unfortunately it was no middle class, when Marx wrote his The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon and he saw a great danger for revolution from lumpenproletariat.
    Anyway, now it is completely changed and lumpenproletariat is the driving force of most revolutions.


    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bobo View Post
    And just because working class people were declared middle class in the 80/90s it doesn't make it so.
    Are you sure?
    Main difference is that proletariat doesn’t have anything to lose; middle class has what to lose. How many people now in Ireland have nothing to lose now?

    I know that FF is working very hard with trade unions to make everybody poor by increasing taxes in order to keep public workers and local lumpenproletariat (professional welfare recipients) happy, but they need some time to do it.

    It was good description during Soviet times what is capitalism and what is socialism
    Socialism is trying to get rid of rich people, by killing them
    Capitalism is trying to get rid of poor, by giving equal opportunities for everybody. Of coarse, there are different starting point for rich and poor, but FYI 4 years ago 31% of Fortune-500 were born in poor families.

  6. #106
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,728

    Capitalistic cronyism,coroperate welfare,state manipulated capitalism has failed.
    Government plays mind games with joe public.Governments love this failure its allows them to blindside, blame and scapegoat ..Now they have created a problem,they hoodwink the population into thinking that they are the only ones that can fix it,eventough they were the ones that caused it.
    It allows these parasites to gain more power,restrict liberty,tax ,regulate.spend borrowed money paid for by the people.
    Quote Originally Posted by X-ray View Post
    Capitalism has failed and needs to quickly reinvent itself or god knows what comes next. No point going an a scare rant about commies etc.
    The USA has really run into the ground morally, politically, culturally, militarily and now economically. The people who think the current model is the best better start putting some ideas in front of the general public that do not blame everyone else and seek only to make excuses. Otherwise we might have more clare dalys to deal with than would be funny.
    Most people are worried about their own situation more that any ideological debate of political loyalty. Thats why cowen keeps getting it wrong, he just does not understand how ordinary people relate to politics. He never even had to get elected in a cumann let alone fight a grass roots local election. Politics better re-connect very quickly or the system will start to fail.
    A champion of the people emerges with the age-old and appealing promise of "something for nothing" - to be financed through every-increasing taxes. Supply and demand are thrown out of gear - the overhead goes up; the effective use of human energy goes down; the standard of living is lowered because money cannot buy wealth that is not produced.

    WEAVER, HENRY GRADY,

  7. #107
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5,853

    Quote Originally Posted by Colada View Post
    Not sure about Socialism, but De-regulation is dead, and Globalisation is teetering on the brink (listen to Sarko and Obama). De-regulation has been proven to be a failure not just in Banking, but in numerous other sectors. It simply promotes greed and irresponsibility, it rapes the earths resources and environment and it impoverishes the weak. Globalisation is its bast@rd child.

    When the scions of Irish Business cannot regulate themselves, what hope for the rest of the pack?

    Goodbye to all that. And good riddance.
    I agree about globalisation...part of the problem is governments seem no longer to be in control and at the mercy of fly by night capitalists...

    Too much public wealth delivered into private hands in this country and others, but we have FF and the last 10 years to thank for that.

    Protectionism seems to be the only cure now. Outsourcing as I have said before will send us all back to Victorian sweatshops. Our children and grandchildren will live lives little different to those in the sweatshops of Asia or Victorian England as they struggle to compete under the free market. Only the fittest, ie those who can work like slaves without pay will survive. That is the ultimate goal of the capitalists and because many people stay quiet and are afraid to challenge this, it will come to pass.

    If there is mass unemployment in the West because of outsourcing to the East, there will be no market for products in the West. This will in time depress both Western and Eastern economies. It is happening already. Unemployment on the rise in the West leading to a fall off in demand for goods manufactured in the East leading to job lay-offs in the East. In the main caused by job outsourcing, a vicious circle that muse be put a stop to.

    Only when the last job is lost in the West to oursourcing, will people wake up and say 'hey, maybe free trade isn't that great after all.'

  8. #108
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bandon
    Posts
    622

    Lthse wrote:
    Totally agree, we just had a crony "free market" for the rich and an over-regulated free market for the middle class, farmers and workers. Now we have socialism for the bankers and developers to bail them out.
    See. If you just wait long enough somebody will put the issue into context.
    "In our age there is no such thing as 'keeping out of politics.' All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia."
    George Orwell

  9. #109
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    262

    Quote Originally Posted by Dios View Post
    Regulation does stop abuses, ref Glass-Steagall act. Unlike people who break laws, companies can be dissolved into nothingness by regulatory authorities, chopped up and sold for spare parts.
    fair point, but show me how AIG, Citi, Anglo, and a host of others have been made to pay? In fact, their reckless approach has basically helped them because they got bailouts in return for bad behavior!

    the only one really paying in all of this is the taxpayer

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  10. #110
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    262

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bobo View Post
    That is why some people would rather not work rather than take a job which they feel is under paid or lacks dignity. Of course the capitalist solution is to threaten people with starvation or homelessness if they will not sell their labour at a rate that will create profit.
    i guess socialists on the scratch have to justify it somehow.

    of course, the one thing i noticed with lots of socialists, is they reckon being able to debate politics makes them 'worthwhile' when in fact, that won't even get you a job in McDonalds, but then again, if you were to consider doing that job it might be 'beneath you' and 'lacking in dignity' or 'underpaid'.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Page 11 of 26 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Can Socialism progress.
    By manna in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 103
    Last Post: 12th July 2009, 10:42 PM
  2. FF Socialism
    By Bedstore in forum Fianna Fáil
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 21st May 2008, 02:51 PM
  3. Community Led Socialism
    By Bob Dylan in forum Sinn Féin
    Replies: 181
    Last Post: 16th December 2007, 11:40 PM
  4. Socialism
    By west_brit in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 148
    Last Post: 2nd March 2006, 09:30 PM