It's not a teaser - I don't know.
I was wondering though if we would be better off immediately nationalising all of the banks and then look at bad bank, mergers, restaffing the top etc etc
I'm not a left wing "nationalise everything" believer so I would have to say my approach would be for this to be done on a temporary basis only.
Would it achieve anything? We are already in hock for all the deposits and for the interbank debt (through the guarantee scheme) - presumably forced nationalisation wipes out the bond holders and the equity holders (lads ye're down 95%+ so the last 5% ain't gonna make a difference).
One key advantage would be breathing space - it would take the shares off the market and stop them being pummelled out there everyday.
It would also probably give us a bit more control - as the owner we could presumably veto board appointments etc.
Is there a big downside?
Presumably if/when we get the current issues resolved we could refloat maybe 2/3 of them in some form of retail banking operation and the state could make some money out of that process too (maybe next year when a billion or 2 might be useful in the state coffers).
I don't know if it makes sense or if I've spent too much time on p.ie and have become infected with communitis !



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote