cuts "worse than 1987" says An Bord Snip Nua..

[Factorem]

I've deleted off-topic posts, I'll delete more if they're posted.

Good. Hate-posts along the lines of "all religion should be banned" have no place on a civilised forum.

Regarding cuts. Bring them on. It's time the fat quango cats are culled.h

[drbob1972]

What the hell is your problem?

How do you propose seizing privately owned land?

I suppose you'd be in favour of shutting down churches too "in the national interest".

The fascism on display here is appalling.

one assumes that he's referring to the church land and property that has been / will be handed over to the state as part of the deal done to remove any further liablity for abuse cases of the church and its members........

[Factorem]

one assumes that he's referring to the church land and property that has been / will be handed over to the state as part of the deal done to remove any further liablity for abuse cases of the church and its members........

Due process will take its course.

Your anti-Catholic fantasies aren't going to be realised by ranting on raving on an internet forum any time soon. Maybe you should go down to your local convent and speak your mind. You might even get struck by a bolt of God's grace.

[drbob1972]

Due process will take its course.

Your anti-Catholic fantasies aren't going to be realised by ranting on raving on an internet forum any time soon. Maybe you should go down to your local convent and speak your mind. You might even get struck by a bolt of God's grace.

what anti-catholic fantasies?, what ranting or raving?, i simply stated fact and tried to inform where on the basis of the suggestion of selling church property may have arisen from, then again if forgot i was dealing with the village idiot and should have just ignored you.........

[Oppenheimer]

one assumes that he's referring to the church land and property that has been / will be handed over to the state as part of the deal done to remove any further liablity for abuse cases of the church and its members........

Indeed, a rational debater like your good self saw this, and did not ascribe to it a manifestation of hate. It is a viable way to tackle the deleveraging concept in the presentation referenced in the OP if indeed the Govt. is entitled to this property.