According to the Bacon report the 25% oversupply in hotel rooms is due to inappropriate tax breaks. Many of these new 'tax shelter' hotels are competing with long established businesses.
This smacks of 'privatising profits and socialising losses'. The reason that these 'tax shelter' hotels continue to remain open is that the original tax advantages could be clawed back if the hotels close inside 7 years of opening.
So the taxpayer gets squeezed twice? First on loss of original tax paid and then on some scheme to sort out the overhang in an 'orderly way'?



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote