What has any of this got to do with your rather bizarre claim that the ESRI report states the PS is bloated?
As for your claim that the arguments are threadbare, that my dear boy is merely your assessment, nothing more.
The fact remains that the bulk of the civil service, ie those of CO grade, are modestly paid.
Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.
George Will
Right now, I feel if there is a public sector pay cut, it is like dipping into a family's food and bills money to pay off a gambling debt, while the gambler is still off gambling with the family's future (Anglo). Its quite possible enabling behaviour that allows the addict to continue in denial rather than face the consequences of what they have done. I don't think this is healthy. Quit the gambling, admit your problem (an economy built to service bankers and builders), show us that the govt can take responsibility for past actions and for sorting out the mess they are responsible for, make regulations now to benefit the real productive economy (sme sector), then talk about public sector pay cuts. Otherwise its futile. We'll run down our public services for naught.
Read the ESRI report Kev.. The summary again for the slow learners..
Furthermore, we found that by 2006 senior public service workers earned approximately 10 per cent more than their private sector counterparts, while those in lower-level grades earned between 24 and 32 per cent more
Now, why is this important? Well, the old chesnut, that those of us working in the private sector ARE paying your wages.. The guys in the construction sector paid your benchmarked pay increases.. But now they have done a bunk, I'm damned if we have to pick up the tab to keep you in the style you are accustomed to and not b1tch about it.. Princess..
Originally Posted by The Red Rose of Cork
I dont care about "the majority of people"
Now, why is this important? Well, the old chesnut, that those of us working in the private sector ARE paying your wages.. The guys in the construction sector paid your benchmarked pay increases.. But now they have done a bunk[/QUOTE]
You are still making the mistake of not equating like with like. This is where you continuously fall down.
Are you telling me an Office worker (with Degree and 6 yrs experience) earns 24-34% less than a CO on 30K pa with 6 yrs experience?
Are you telling me that office workers (with Degree) earns 20-25K
ESRI are currently being called to task for making the same mistakes IBEC made with using averages and not taking into account time served for comparative analysis. They did not do a thorough and systematic comparison on an exact job description for job description basis and until they do the result is meaningless as a wage comparison study.
I can assure you that the ESRI report will be revised accordingly.
But you don't mind picking up the tab for the idiots in the Banking sector who where major influential factors in getting us into this mess.I'm damned if we have to pick up the tab to keep you in the style you are accustomed to and not b1tch about it.. Princess..
B*tch away.....Princess.
Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.
George Will