Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Any wonder public spending is out of control!

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,554

    Any wonder public spending is out of control!

    By Grainne Cunningham, Anne-Marie Walsh and Andrew Bushe


    Monday December 15 2008

    A SENIOR An Post manager has been awarded a bonus of €11,000 on top of his €95,000 salary, even though he only worked for 11 weeks of last year.

    The manager was assigned to An Post's 'resource centre' in January 2007, an area known by post office employees as the "rubber room", where staff who are "surplus" to the company's needs are deployed.

    The centre was dubbed the "rubber room" because "people were banging their heads off the walls because they were doing nothing", a union representative said.

    General secretary of the Communications Workers Union Steve Fitzpatrick said the resource centre was a "waste of money" because managers had little to do but were assigned there following a restructuring of the company.

    A spokeswoman for An Post said staff were placed in the resource centre if they had chosen not to avail of a "number of options" offered following the restructuring process.

    She said it was "very atypical" for staff there to work just 11 weeks of the year and said they were encouraged to go on "various self-development courses" and skill-building training.

    The spokeswoman could not confirm how many staff are based in the centre, which is believed to be located at College House, near Pearse Street, Dublin 2.

    The existence of this 'elephant's graveyard' emerged after the manager took a case to the Labour Court, claiming he was entitled to a bonus of €15,192 for 2007 and not the €3,200 he received.

    The court heard that he was based in the resource centre from January to October 2007 and was then assigned to An Post's "Strategy and Business Excellence Directorate".

    "Staff are assigned to the resource centre when there is no work available for them," the court ruling stated.

    An Post awarded him a bonus payment of 16pc of his salary, based only on the final 11 weeks of 2007 when he was based at the directorate, but he argued it should have been based on his full-year salary.

    The manager, whose claim was backed by the Association of Higher Civil and Public Servants, was offered an additional €7,486 ex-gratia payment by An Post in May in an effort to settle the claim but he turned it down and the issue went before a Labour Court hearing last month.

    The union told the court that An Post had denied the manager "the opportunity to participate fully in the organisation by not providing him with work during the period January to October 2007 and thereby denying him the opportunity to earn his full bonus for the year".

    It said he was available for work, that suitable work existed and he had made several requests for work.

    An Post argued that "bonus payments are not an entitlement but are based on an assessment of actual performance and as such are at the discretion of the company" and said there was no contractual basis for the worker's claim when "he was surplus and only employed on effective work for 11 weeks of that year".

    In a recommendation that has just become available, the court found the manager "was entitled to the full company performance bonus despite his assignment to the resource centre" but upheld An Post's decision to not pay the personal performance bonus for the period when he was not actively engaged.

    Consequently, the Labour Court recommended that An Post's May "gesture of goodwill" additional bonus payment of almost €7,500 should be reoffered and "accepted in full and final settlement" of the manager's claim.

    John Kelleher, Deputy General Secretary of the Association of Higher Civil and Public Servants, which represented the manager, said he could not reveal his identify.

    Downsizing

    He said the individual in question was one of at least 20 managers who were identified as "surplus" to requirements during a downsizing programme at An Post around 2005.

    Mr Kelleher said the majority of the managers wished to remain employed and were assigned to the resource centre, but many had since been redeployed.

    - Grainne Cunningham, Anne-Marie Walsh and Andrew Bushe

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Regular sandar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    7,103

    oh my god............................................... .......................we cant afford cervical cancer vaccines, but taxpayers are paying huge money to lads who do nothing but scratch themselves.................

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Regular Munion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Dublin West
    Posts
    3,115

    Surely if there is no work for somebody then a redundancy situation exists and that person is let go.
    Freedom, Tolerance & Equality of Opportunity

    Economic Left/Right: -1.25
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.33

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    339

    Stephens Green

    Hangman Wanted - Loads of upcoming work.

    Let the Revolution begin.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    275

    Watch Big Bobo come and defend this. Whatever you do, do not mock the Public Sector. I think we can agree this would not happen in the Private sector!

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    2,062

    Commercial Semi State lads. The money was not stolen from sick kids to pay this waster

    I don't like the fact that this goes on but it is a legacy from the transfer of An Post to becoming a Semi-State. The fact that this guy cannot be made redundant needs to be managed not ignored. The real gobshi1es in this situation is senior management who knew they were paying somebody for being in their employ but failed to find appropriate work for him to do. It looks like they tried to squeeze him out by making his life a misery.

    Pathetic and cowardly management.

    BTW there are many "Elephants Graveyards" across the public service (and I am sure there are many similar situations private sector as well). As I said, a big failure of management all round.
    The Illuminati ...... because payback's a Bit
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    h.

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Regular sandar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    7,103

    paying him to do no work and giving him a business(presumably for achieving the task of doing no work very well) is not making his life a misery.

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,183

    Quote Originally Posted by sandar View Post
    paying him to do no work and giving him a business(presumably for achieving the task of doing no work very well) is not making his life a misery.
    What business did they give him ?

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Regular sandar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    7,103

    sorry I meant 'bonus'

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    339

    Quote Originally Posted by Rich OC View Post
    The money was not stolen from sick kids to pay this waster
    Well forensically it was, follow the logical trail.....

    The money has to come from An Post who in turn must charge the customers more to facilitate such largesse

    The extra money charged to the customer reduces our Nations competiveness / increases our cost of doing business / maybe even reduces the quality of our postal service!

    Now, a business may not be able to hire that extra employee due to its high postal costs thus in turn less generated wealth taxes are returned to Revenue and less money is available for sick kids....


    Its a big wheel and every action (or not) has a consequence.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 66
    Last Post: 5th March 2009, 12:26 PM
  2. Replies: 94
    Last Post: 19th February 2009, 11:39 PM
  3. Public spending last year at 40% of GNP
    By NewsBot in forum Economy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 3rd February 2009, 07:40 AM
  4. Public Spending Cuts - Job losses
    By oho_noho in forum Economy
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 27th January 2009, 06:17 PM
  5. Cowen on getting value for money in public spending
    By MichaelHennigan in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24th October 2005, 01:00 AM