Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: Too Big to Fail vs Nationalisation

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Regular seabhcan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    12,560

    Too Big to Fail vs Nationalisation

    I saw an Obama staffee on TV last night and she made a very good point about the nature of modern capitolism. On the one hand we privatise critical public services, on the other we allow giant mega corporations to form through merger. Neither can be allowed to collapse because they are "too big to fail". The state doesn't want to let the market decide if we can have water or electricity or trains and roads. So whats private about these private corporations? Only the profit. The loss is covered by the tax payer.

    So, as a rule of thumb, companies should only be allowed to exist in the private sphere if they can be allowed to fail. If they can't they should be either nationalised or broken up.

    I wonder if this will be Obama policy.
    "Who will bailout the IMF after FF is finished with them?"

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    11,510

    Re: Too Big to Fail vs Nationalisation

    Quote Originally Posted by seabhcan
    I saw an Obama staffee on TV last night and she made a very good point about the nature of modern capitolism. On the one hand we privatise critical public services, on the other we allow giant mega corporations to form through merger. Neither can be allowed to collapse because they are "too big to fail". The state doesn't want to let the market decide if we can have water or electricity or trains and roads. So whats private about these private corporations? Only the profit. The loss is covered by the tax payer.

    So, as a rule of thumb, companies should only be allowed to exist in the private sphere if they can be allowed to fail. If they can't they should be either nationalised or broken up.

    I wonder if this will be Obama policy.
    No, very little will change as long the Corps fund and steer both parties in the US.
    Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.

    George Will

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,056

    Re: Too Big to Fail vs Nationalisation

    Good idea. The one positive thing about this current crisis is that faith in unregulated free markets will be badly shaken. Hopefully we'll then see the widespread adoption of the Scandinavian/German/Singaporean economic models. Prosperity, fairness and stability: only the most deluded ideologues would object.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Regular Pauli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Pfäffikon, Kanton Schwyz, Switzerland.
    Posts
    7,113

    Re: Too Big to Fail vs Nationalisation

    Quote Originally Posted by jfk2008
    Good idea. The one positive thing about this current crisis is that faith in unregulated free markets will be badly shaken. Hopefully we'll then see the widespread adoption of the Scandinavian/German/Singaporean economic models. Prosperity, fairness and stability: only the most deluded ideologues would object.
    ...........and there's plenty of them on this site. Just wait for the neo-liberal nutjobs to arrive.
    Fianna Fail - The Loss of Sovereignty Party.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    11,510

    Re: Too Big to Fail vs Nationalisation

    Quote Originally Posted by jfk2008
    Good idea. The one positive thing about this current crisis is that faith in unregulated free markets will be badly shaken. Hopefully we'll then see the widespread adoption of the Scandinavian/German/Singaporean economic models. Prosperity, fairness and stability: only the most deluded ideologues would object.
    Oops, don't tell that to Clanretard, he seems to think that neo-liberals favour regulation and that the primary argument amongst them is how much.
    Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.

    George Will

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Regular seabhcan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    12,560

    Re: Too Big to Fail vs Nationalisation

    Quote Originally Posted by Pauli
    Quote Originally Posted by jfk2008
    Good idea. The one positive thing about this current crisis is that faith in unregulated free markets will be badly shaken. Hopefully we'll then see the widespread adoption of the Scandinavian/German/Singaporean economic models. Prosperity, fairness and stability: only the most deluded ideologues would object.
    ...........and there's plenty of them on this site. Just wait for the neo-liberal nutjobs to arrive.
    Its too early for them. They don't wake up until around 2pm.
    "Who will bailout the IMF after FF is finished with them?"

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,056

    Re: Too Big to Fail vs Nationalisation

    Quote Originally Posted by Pauli
    Quote Originally Posted by jfk2008
    Good idea. The one positive thing about this current crisis is that faith in unregulated free markets will be badly shaken. Hopefully we'll then see the widespread adoption of the Scandinavian/German/Singaporean economic models. Prosperity, fairness and stability: only the most deluded ideologues would object.
    ...........and there's plenty of them on this site. Just wait for the neo-liberal nutjobs to arrive.
    I'm including ideologues from the far left in that comment. I'm a pragmatist not an ideologue.

    We need to look at the countries that have achieved a high degree of prosperity, fairness and economic stability then copy and adapt their economic models.

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    11,510

    Re: Too Big to Fail vs Nationalisation

    Quote Originally Posted by jfk2008
    Quote Originally Posted by Pauli
    Quote Originally Posted by jfk2008
    Good idea. The one positive thing about this current crisis is that faith in unregulated free markets will be badly shaken. Hopefully we'll then see the widespread adoption of the Scandinavian/German/Singaporean economic models. Prosperity, fairness and stability: only the most deluded ideologues would object.
    ...........and there's plenty of them on this site. Just wait for the neo-liberal nutjobs to arrive.
    I'm including ideologues from the far left in that comment. I'm a pragmatist not an ideologue.

    We need to look at the countries that have achieved a high degree of prosperity, fairness and economic stability then copy and adapt their economic models.
    That would be the Scandinavian/Germanic/Singaporean models.
    Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.

    George Will

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Regular Pauli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Pfäffikon, Kanton Schwyz, Switzerland.
    Posts
    7,113

    Re: Too Big to Fail vs Nationalisation

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Doyle
    Quote Originally Posted by jfk2008
    Quote Originally Posted by Pauli
    Quote Originally Posted by jfk2008
    Good idea. The one positive thing about this current crisis is that faith in unregulated free markets will be badly shaken. Hopefully we'll then see the widespread adoption of the Scandinavian/German/Singaporean economic models. Prosperity, fairness and stability: only the most deluded ideologues would object.
    ...........and there's plenty of them on this site. Just wait for the neo-liberal nutjobs to arrive.
    I'm including ideologues from the far left in that comment. I'm a pragmatist not an ideologue.

    We need to look at the countries that have achieved a high degree of prosperity, fairness and economic stability then copy and adapt their economic models.
    That would be the Scandinavian/Germanic/Singaporean models.
    Indeed. Greetings from Switzerland
    Fianna Fail - The Loss of Sovereignty Party.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    721

    Re: Too Big to Fail vs Nationalisation

    Quote Originally Posted by Pauli
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Doyle
    Quote Originally Posted by jfk2008
    Quote Originally Posted by Pauli
    Quote Originally Posted by jfk2008
    Good idea. The one positive thing about this current crisis is that faith in unregulated free markets will be badly shaken. Hopefully we'll then see the widespread adoption of the Scandinavian/German/Singaporean economic models. Prosperity, fairness and stability: only the most deluded ideologues would object.
    ...........and there's plenty of them on this site. Just wait for the neo-liberal nutjobs to arrive.
    I'm including ideologues from the far left in that comment. I'm a pragmatist not an ideologue.

    We need to look at the countries that have achieved a high degree of prosperity, fairness and economic stability then copy and adapt their economic models.
    That would be the Scandinavian/Germanic/Singaporean models.
    Indeed. Greetings from Switzerland
    Remind me again how UBS/Credit Suisse are doing!!!

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Bank Nationalisation: Round II
    By Factorem in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 29th April 2009, 12:30 AM
  2. Nationalisation Survey
    By Caoimhe Hynes in forum Economy
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20th April 2009, 07:26 PM
  3. Bolshie nationalisation of banks?
    By patslatt in forum Economy
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 27th November 2008, 07:22 PM
  4. Oil company Nationalisation
    By odie1kanobe in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 20th November 2007, 06:33 PM