But you'd no problem with the benchmarking body assessing the worth of your labour.
Oh yeah, the difference being that they were handing out a 9% increase.
After magically considering your labour to undervalued to exactly the same extent as 350,000 other public servants.
Strange there were no high and mighty denials then that the laymen on the BM body couldn't possibly understand what super-humans like yourself get up to at work.
Your thought process is just a tad self-serving, no?
Of course you've no problem assessing how much tax I should pay. So as to fund your lavish salary.
We don't need to know how to do your job to comment on your renumeration. It's sufficient to know how similar roles are renumerated in the UK or Finland, and to have a sense of what the country can afford.
And 240k for a 33 hour week counts as unaffordable in this climate, as is the fact that its over twice the salary such jobs yield in Denmark or Germany.
Nor do we need to how good or bad you personally perform in your job. PS pay scales are all standardized, so the under-performers are subsidized by the over-achievers. Even where performance-related bonuses are involved, these become an entitlement that everyone gets, even the useless An Post managers consigned to the rubber room.
Good luck. I hear Finland is beautiful at this time of year!There you will find the high taxes you crave. But also more reasonable levels of renumeration. And hopefully learn the lesson that high taxes can be used for purposes other than over-rewarding public servants.
Eh, its your protégés Hopi and Kev who continually argue that the private sector workers were all coining it during the boom, what with their commisions, company cars & bonuses. When nobody wanted those safe PS jobs. But despite the lack of interest in these permanent & pensionable gigs, somehow the brightest and the best were recruited.
I've always argued that typical private sector workers are low- to medium-paid wage slaves or salarymen.
The innovators are outliers, that has always been the case. And that's a large part of what makes an innovation-based economy so fragile, easily destroyed by meddling tax-and-spend idealogues like yourself.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
There you will find the high taxes you crave. But also more reasonable levels of renumeration. And hopefully learn the lesson that high taxes can be used for purposes other than over-rewarding public servants.
Reply With Quote