Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 134

Thread: CPSU membership reject Croke Park Deal

  1. #111
    Politics.ie Member CookieMonster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Fontvieille, Monaco.
    Posts
    34,717

    Quote Originally Posted by kittyn View Post
    *God* in all fairness person x earning 200k pays approximately 70k in tax, person y pays say around 5k - Big difference as in person x earns 6.6 times the amount of person y but yet person x pays 14 times the amount in tax...........
    I'd also suggest that the person X demands less for state provided services than person Y.
    A poster of some consequence...

  2. #112
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,036

    Quote Originally Posted by CookieMonster View Post
    I'd also suggest that the person X demands less for state provided services than person Y.
    Couldn't agree more.........
    'This life is not a dress rehearsal, we only get one shot at today'

  3. #113
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4,761

    Quote Originally Posted by grafter1 View Post
    Oh they all caused the crisis. Every person making money? None of them created employment or none of them still do?? This level of thinking just annoys me - sweeping statements. Average joe is good wealthy man bad - i thought the irish were an educated bunch?

    Anyway how would you introduce a wealth tax. Would it be a tax on cash sitting in banks, a tax on total assets???

    Would it be an annual tax??


    Would it have any economic effects in your opinion?
    Oh, I'm sure it could be done....
    Keep spinning against these people in the media "Average Joe Good. Wealthy Man Bad". Keep saying that phrase over and over, till everyone ringing Liveline is repeating it like a mantra

    Then bring in a budget where you seize a wad of their money--cash, assets, whatever----don't touch any one else, except the unemployed. Then call it "a very fair budget" . Flood TV programmes with frowning talking heads who assure everyone "It had to be done" and "More will have to be slashed in the future"

    Jeer at them gleefully...

    Laugh when they say they didn't "cause the crisis". Yah, boo, suck it up.

    If they complain, tell them to "stop moaning"

    Tell them to think of the country. and that "everyone is feeling pain"

    No, it probably would not have much "economic effect", but sure, it would be great fun watching their misery

    Job done.

    This strategy worked like a dream with the PS.....

  4. #114
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,242

    Quote Originally Posted by gatsbygirl20 View Post
    Oh, I'm sure it could be done....
    Keep spinning against these people in the media "Average Joe Good. Wealthy Man Bad". Keep saying that phrase over and over, till everyone ringing Liveline is repeating it like a mantra

    Then bring in a budget where you seize a wad of their money--cash, assets, whatever----don't touch any one else, except the unemployed. Then call it "a very fair budget" . Flood TV programmes with frowning talking heads who assure everyone "It had to be done" and "More will have to be slashed in the future"

    Jeer at them gleefully...

    Laugh when they say they didn't "cause the crisis". Yah, boo, suck it up.

    If they complain, tell them to "stop moaning"

    Tell them to think of the country. and that "everyone is feeling pain"

    No, it probably would not have much "economic effect", but sure, it would be great fun watching their misery

    Job done.

    This strategy worked like a dream with the PS.....
    While i enjoyed reading your rant !!!

    Is there a specific group of people that you have in your sights?

  5. #115
    Politics.ie Regular Grumpy Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    6,186

    Quote Originally Posted by *God* View Post
    Unfortunately nothing will be 100% fair..........but it will still be a start and be somewhat more just !!








    It's of no matter what % of who pays whats, simply those who can afford more pay more...

    If some one earns €200k they can afford to pay more tax easier than someone on €30k...
    Im not suggesting that they pay vast amounts of more tax..simply enough to make it easier on the little guy...a weekend away less or a few pairs less of BT jeans wont kill anyone ..but skipping a doctors appointment because you cant afford it might just kill someone....fairness and equality !!
    You are missing the point. People who earn more do pay more. And yes, there is scope for them paying some more.

    The problem is we are too reliant on too few people for our income tax take - 4% earning above €100k pay 48% and the 46% earning between €18,400 and €100k pay the other 52%. The other 50% pay no income tax.

    The loss of even a few hundred of the very high earners (above €275k) - through death, illness, redundancy, business collapsing, emigration - and paycuts, loss of bonuses and falling revenue for thousands of others will have a catastrophic effect on our tax take. There are around 11,000 of them and they contribute around €2billion in income tax each year.

    While job losses have played a significant part in the collapse of the income tax take in the last two years, pay cuts, loss of overtime, loss of bonuses and collapsing revenues for the self-employed have also been a major factor.

    According to the Revenue's own figures as quoted by Lenihan in the Dail, 50% of people are outside the tax net. That is simply unsustainable today and those people will have to be brought into the tax net.

    That can only be done by cutting tax credits and allowances so that they pay some income tax. It will also see every other worker paying more income tax.

    That is not me being some rabid, right-wing Thatcherite who preys on the low paid and vulnerable (I'm not) - it is simple arithmetic and plain common sense.

    While taking the lowest paid out of the tax net was a noble goal, it is simply unaffordable - especially since we also insist on high spending on public services, pensions and social welfare. That is why we have such a massive structural deficit.

    To bridge that gap, the tax cuts of the Ahern years for the lowest paid and those on median pay (between €20k and €30k who pay between 2% and 5% in income tax) will have to be reversed in the years ahead. And Lenihan has already flagged that he will do that.

    Checck out these links. They make for interesting reading and explain things better than I do.

    A little quiz on Ireland’s income tax | Ronan Lyons

    Budget 2011 and the eight things on Ireland’s fiscal to-do list | Ronan Lyons
    Last edited by Grumpy Jack; 13th May 2010 at 10:51 PM.

  6. #116
    Politics.ie Regular making waves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,683

    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy Jack View Post

    According to the Revenue's own figures as quoted by Lenihan in the Dail, 50% of people are outside the tax net. That is simply unsustainable today and those people will have to be brought into the tax net.
    How gullible are you guys? - something approaching 50% of people are outside the income tax net because their incomes are so low - bad wages = little tax - but these people are not outside the tax net, they pay VAT (a regressive tax not based on ability to pay), they pay excise duty (a regressive tax not based on ability to pay), they pay the new carbon tax (a regressive tax not based on ability to pay) etc etc. Ireland has the fifth highest level of indirect taxes out of the 27 EU countries -and indirect taxes hit the lowest earners and those on social welfare hardest.

    Ireland's total tax take is the fifth lowest in the EU as a % of GDP - but even this is skewed badly in favour of the wealthy. And guess what's happening? - you got it - the government are piling more and more tax on ordinary working people and the unemployed and letting those that bankroll their parties off scot-free.

    So you are wrong to claim that 50% of people are outside the tax net - I suggest you wake up and smell what you are shovelling.

  7. #117
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    3,866

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Walsh View Post
    Well for a start someone who works as a contracter doesn't pay PRSI, as he cannot get social welfare; most Public Servants once made permament will never be a burden on the social welfare system. It is therefore grossly unfair that I should have to fund such a system. What i do believe is that the PRSI could be amalgamated into a new social levy where those persons who may rely on the welfare state funfd the system there to back them up.
    First off, the fact that you can even state that a ps worker is unlikely to avail of prsi points to part if the problem within the ps itself, which is the perceived job for life mentality!

    Second prsi is not just for unemployment benefit, it covers for a multitude of other safety nets etc also

    thirdly, it us a find, which means it is a fund created by people in employment, but shared by all, it's not put into a seperare bank account with your name on it in case you need it fir a rainy day!

    It is however an intersting concept that you speak of in that ps workers should nit pay prsi as they are unlikely to use it! If the os wish to seperYe themselves out in this way, do you also agree that os should pay entirely for it's own pension scheme, should exclude itself from being able to avail of FIS etc ?
    Progressive and fair taxation = 2012 Merc e250 elegance purchase price/value €47,910 Road Tax:- €156 2005 vw passat 1.9L diesel price/value €8000, Road Tax :- €582

  8. #118
    Politics.ie Regular Grumpy Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    6,186

    Quote Originally Posted by making waves View Post
    How gullible are you guys? - something approaching 50% of people are outside the income tax net because their incomes are so low - bad wages = little tax - but these people are not outside the tax net, they pay VAT (a regressive tax not based on ability to pay), they pay excise duty (a regressive tax not based on ability to pay), they pay the new carbon tax (a regressive tax not based on ability to pay) etc etc. Ireland has the fifth highest level of indirect taxes out of the 27 EU countries -and indirect taxes hit the lowest earners and those on social welfare hardest.

    Ireland's total tax take is the fifth lowest in the EU as a % of GDP - but even this is skewed badly in favour of the wealthy. And guess what's happening? - you got it - the government are piling more and more tax on ordinary working people and the unemployed and letting those that bankroll their parties off scot-free.

    So you are wrong to claim that 50% of people are outside the tax net - I suggest you wake up and smell what you are shovelling.
    Get real. People on low income pay very little tax of any sort.

    The vast bulk of tax (income tax, VAT, VRT and stamp duty) is paid by middle and higher earners (above €50k) simply because they have more disposable income and spend it on higher priced items.

    Someone spending a few thousand on one item in BT will pay more VAT than 20 people shopping in Dunnes or Pennys.

    Someone forking out €60k for an Audi or a Merc will pay a hell of a lot more VAT and VRT in one go than 10 low earners will pay in VAT and excise duty in a year. And that's before you factor in the petrol to run it. And all the other high-end spending he does in the year.

    Simple arithmetic tells you that those with higher diposable incomes who spend it on more expensive goods on a more regular basis contribute far more to the exchequer than those on the minimum wage.

    That's why income tax rates on middle and higher earners are not higher - because far more can be gained if they spend the money than can be taken off them in income tax.

    That's why the government took in so much revenue during the so-called boom - because middle and higher earners where spending their money on expensive consumers goods like designer clothers, higher spec cars, high-end TVs, overpriced houses and overpriced furniture, and lots of flights abroad, as well as in restaurants, bars and fancy hotels across the country.

    When that spending stopped - revenue collapsed. And then fell even further when people employed in those stores, car showrooms, auctioneers, restaurants, bars and hotels lost their jobs precisely because the spending stopped.

    People like you give me a real laugh - your solution to everything is make the guy with the money pay. Here's some news, the better-off more than pay their fair share in this country. It's those on the lowest incomes who contribute least. They demand and avail of expensive public services for which they pay little or nothing.

    Well guess what? The free ride is over and they're going to have to start contributing just like the rest of us.

    Did you even read those links I posted? Ireland's income tax take for median earners (€25k) is around 4% - the OECD average which includes most EU members is 20%. Go figure why we have a big hole in our state finances.

    And in no other EU countries do those earning less than €18k pay no income tax.

    In the UK, the tax free allowance is £6.5k then all above it comes in at 20 per cent until the higher 40% rate kicks in at £37.5k and the 50% rate at £150k.

    In Ireland, including the levies and PRSI people earning above €37,400 are paying 51% tax including PRSI, health levy and income levy while the very highest earners are paying a top rate of 55%.

    We cannot afford to have 50% of workers outside the income tax net. It's that simple. And even when FF are booted into oblivion at the next election, FG, Labour and even Sinn Fein if they get into government will have no choice but to bring them into the tax net.

    Even Joe Higgins would have no choice but to do it if he became Minister of Finance tomorrow - and no amount of socialist, left wing bluster can hide that unavoidable fact, unpalatable as it is.
    Last edited by Grumpy Jack; 14th May 2010 at 12:33 AM.

  9. #119
    Politics.ie Regular bormotello's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,829

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Walsh View Post
    most Public Servants once made permament will never be a burden on the social welfare system.
    Do you mean that “jobs for life” will guarantee that PS worker never will burden for welfare system?
    In this case, government should introduce 20% “jobs for life” levy and scrap PRSI for permanent PS workers

  10. #120
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    5,405

    Quote Originally Posted by bormotello View Post
    In this case, government should introduce 20% “jobs for life” levy and scrap PRSI for permanent PS workers
    Why should that happen? Seriously... why? Jobs in the public service are open to everyone to apply for, and unlike the private sector, Daddy can't help you out.

Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Gilmore and the Croke ParK Deal
    By thetruthsback in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 4th June 2010, 03:29 PM
  2. Croke Park deal - major surprise
    By hammer in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 13th May 2010, 02:04 PM
  3. IMPACT to recommend rejection of Croke Park deal
    By Johnny in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 159
    Last Post: 11th April 2010, 10:28 AM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 9th April 2010, 11:37 AM
  5. CPSU Executive reject pay deal: Times
    By kerrynorth in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 4th October 2008, 04:11 PM