minimum i think.
which would tie in to multiple breaches of money laundering leglisation. if someone transfered money dogyly they'd be breaking rules that could add up to 10yrs consectuatively . failour to report a transaction to a reporting officer is 5yrs in itself. at seanies scale im not sure what goes on but at my level thats what i could be done with.
a link to the act is on page one of this thread (if you have your display setting at maximum 20 post a page. )
Schadenfreude anyone?
"We are such stuff
As dreams are made on; and our little life
Is rounded with a sleep." - The Tempest, Act 4, Scene 1
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]That’s fair enough, I don’t think FF or anyone else can be directly held responsible for any banks actions. Banks manage themselves and make their own decisions.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]However , the conduct of our banks was allowed to go unchecked for years. This was where the economic and financial services regulation by the Central Bank and the Financial Regulator has been shown in hindsight to be utterly failed.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]Given that a booming economy is of massive electoral benefit to an incumbent Government, the question is, was the CB and FinReg encouraged or even leaned on to take a light-hearted approach by the FF Governments from say 2002 ?[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]Was the complacency in Regulation intentional ?[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]As this question can probably never be proved one way or the other, it will be up to the electorate to decide for themselves.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]
[/SIZE][/FONT]
Under Review.
Line 2.
Do we have the trial of the century to look forward to?
"Who will bailout the IMF after FF is finished with them?"
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.