Apologies if this is already well covered, but found the question on my mind again after reading
this article. For every patsy who overpaid for a site, there must be someone who gained a windfall.
The linked story says a developer paid €115 million in 2007 for the Grafton Street shops occupied by River Island and Wallis.
River Island pay €2,150,000 in rent. Wallis pay €470,000, which may increase post review to €600,000. Which works out as a pretty miserable 2.4% return on the investment. I take it the expectation was that speculative gains in the capital value of the building would justify the price (leaving aside the lack of logic in expecting capital to appreciate in value independently of the rent).
But presumably someone pocketed the €115 million. Frequently in these cases we don't seem to hear about who.
In this case, it seems to have been
purchased from Arnotts.That's fine - I'm not suggesting there's anything wrong with Arnotts making a killing in this way. But should we not hear a bit more about these winners from the bubble? Just to underline the fact that the counterparty to some of these lunatic transactions has profited from a sound business decision.
In the case of the Glass Bottle Factory site, the beneficiaries of the sale seemed to be
Dublin Port and some crowd called South Wharf plc - who apparently were the operators of the Glass Bottle factory.
So presumably both of those entities have trousered the vast amount of money paid for this site. Again, fair play to them. Why would they not get the best price. But, again, all the media coverage is for the losers. Why not remind us of these winners too? Why not remind ourselves that not everyone was an eejit.