the villain in this piece is none other than the retired secretary general whose current pension is now more than his final salary. He’s paid off his mortgage, educated his children and made a packet when he traded down the family home. Between the free travel pass and TV licence, so far he’s the only guy who hasn’t had to experience any of the pain. That is, unless he bought bank shares with the profit from the house. Still, he’s in demand as a board member so there’s still a little extra coming in. Unpaid leave hurts those depending on public services. Unpaid leave hurts the public servant, especially the lower paid, because their take-home pay is reduced. Unpaid leave is a once-off, unwieldy joke that will not make the savings we need. The only reason to suggest unpaid leave as a method of saving money is because by preserving on paper the final salary of a benchmarked position, the only person it doesn’t hurt is the retired public servant. It’s the same reason last year’s pay cut was called a pension levy.
Ictu’s policy is not to stand up and protect Laura’s public services, but Laura’s Daddy’s benchmarked pension. And they talk about fair? What’s fair about that?
And let’s be clear about this. John Bruton is a public service pensioner. Mary Robinson is a public service pensioner. The 52-year-old garda, fit, healthy and starting his second career, is a public service pensioner. So, too, is the revenue commissioner who just took early retirement to beat the contribution caps, but will get hired back as a consultant.