Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst ... 89101112 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 118

Thread: Surely it's time that some high earners are taxed the same as those on much less pay?

  1. #91
    Politics.ie Regular mutley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    4,601

    Quote Originally Posted by toughbutfair View Post
    nobody should have half THEIR money taken from them and given away to those less successful.

    People should pay their own way and stop thinking life is a charity - earn your keep!
    Well you were saying on another thread that your mortgage is only 8% of your net pay,

    Shouldn't the tax system be a bit fairer - in order that those on an industrial wage, can service their mortgage at 8% of net pay too?
    LOL
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    For Ball, not Man playin
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  2. #92
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Down South.
    Posts
    239

    Quote Originally Posted by toughbutfair View Post
    I don't own a car because I CHOSE not to, likewise a minimum wage worker CHOSE to raise a child. Why am I financially responsible to raise their child, that child has no more to do with me than a poor mexican baby which I am not expected to pay for.
    And the child should be left to suffer because his parents made a bad decision when they chose to have him?
    Don't exaggerate either. You're not raising or being asked to raise anyone's child.
    And the only reason I would have for you not paying for (well, paying a share at any rate) other children all over the world is that there is no organisation that could enforce such a measure the way a government can enforce it for us.

    Quote Originally Posted by toughbutfair View Post
    money doesn't get results
    What world do you live in? Of course money gets results.

  3. #93
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    11,510

    Quote Originally Posted by toughbutfair View Post
    I don't believe in starving them to death. I believe in getting them to do something, anything, to earn their welfare for the welfare to be the bare minimum, pure subsistence, no fags, booze, magazines, new clothes etc

    F*ck me. Grinding destitution, what you have described is total impoverishment, depriving even of the will to live.

    That’s libertarianism you're talking about and under such society essentially breaks down and any comforts you have will most likely be taken away from you forcibly by the very people you wish to impoverish further least we turn the country into a police state and revoke a whole raft of civil liberties to keep the poor in their place. Like I said a return to feudalism.

    Mad max stuff.
    Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.

    George Will

  4. #94
    Politics.ie Regular mutley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    4,601

    Quote Originally Posted by Gnome Chomsky View Post
    And the child should be left to suffer because his parents made a bad decision when they chose to have him?
    Don't exaggerate either. You're not raising or being asked to raise anyone's child.
    And the only reason I would have for you not paying for (well, paying a share at any rate) other children all over the world is that there is no organisation that could enforce such a measure the way a government can enforce it for us.



    What world do you live in? Of course money gets results.
    And this bloke is entitled to Child benefit in the same way as somone much less well of is, bet he's not sniffing at that if he has kids
    LOL
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    For Ball, not Man playin
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. #95
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    12,674

    Quote Originally Posted by mutley View Post
    Well you were saying on another thread that your mortgage is only 8% of your net pay,

    Shouldn't the tax system be a bit fairer - in order that those on an industrial wage, can service their mortgage at 8% of net pay too?
    So my argument would hold up better if I bought a bigger, flasher home or failed to make the correct decision regarding what type of mortgage to get? mine is just interest only too so 8% would prob be about 12% if repaying debt.

    People who stretched themselves on their morgage did so in the belief they'd make the most money in a rising market by doing so, their risk - their pain.

    where do you think house prices come from? the people provide the demand side of the equation and the average earners decide how much an average house costs, if they hadn't borrowed as much as they were offerred, they wouldnt' be in as much debt.
    Last edited by toughbutfair; 5th November 2009 at 09:58 PM.

  6. #96
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    12,674

    Quote Originally Posted by Gnome Chomsky View Post
    And the child should be left to suffer because his parents made a bad decision when they chose to have him?
    Don't exaggerate either. You're not raising or being asked to raise anyone's child.
    And the only reason I would have for you not paying for (well, paying a share at any rate) other children all over the world is that there is no organisation that could enforce such a measure the way a government can enforce it for us.



    What world do you live in? Of course money gets results.
    In theory - you'd have us paying to raise all the african babies?

    as for the money issue - why wasn't everybody talking about the greatly improving health sevice we have as we threw money at it?

  7. #97
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    12,674

    Quote Originally Posted by mutley View Post
    And this bloke is entitled to Child benefit in the same way as somone much less well of is, bet he's not sniffing at that if he has kids
    there should be no child benefit - your baby , your responsibility.

  8. #98
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    12,674

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Doyle View Post
    F*ck me. Grinding destitution, what you have described is total impoverishment, depriving even of the will to live.

    That’s libertarianism you're talking about and under such society essentially breaks down and any comforts you have will most likely be taken away from you forcibly by the very people you wish to impoverish further least we turn the country into a police state and revoke a whole raft of civil liberties to keep the poor in their place. Like I said a return to feudalism.

    Mad max stuff.
    In my scenario, there would have been nobody unemployed in the boom, people would have saved their money (very low tax) as there is no safety net, when a recession comes they'd have their savings. It is all about taking control of your life.

  9. #99
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    11,510

    Quote Originally Posted by toughbutfair View Post
    People who stretched themselves on their morgage did so in the belief they'd make the most money in a rising market by doing so, their risk - their pain..
    No they did so because house prices shot through the roof and they had to stretch themsleves just to buy a home.

    Quote Originally Posted by toughbutfair View Post
    where do you think house prices come from? the people provide the demand side of the equation and the average earners decide how much an average house costs, if they hadn't borrowed as much as they were offerred, they wouldnt' be in as much debt.
    My God. You clearly have no idea how a bubble is started and what sustains it before it goes bust.
    Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.

    George Will

  10. #100
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    11,510

    Quote Originally Posted by toughbutfair View Post
    In my scenario, there would have been nobody unemployed in the boom, people would have saved their money (very low tax) as their is no safety net, when a recession comes they'd have their savings. It is all about taking control of your life.
    Again, that is a liberatrian outlook and simply does not mean anything in the real world. You can not take control of your life if you are unemployed.
    Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.

    George Will

Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst ... 89101112 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 68
    Last Post: 1st November 2009, 04:20 PM
  2. Replies: 47
    Last Post: 10th September 2009, 02:10 PM
  3. The 6% of High Income Earners
    By Skin in forum Fianna Fáil
    Replies: 168
    Last Post: 12th March 2009, 11:52 PM
  4. RTE High Earners - Why?
    By Barry in forum Media
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 3rd September 2008, 02:17 AM
  5. Rents hit all-time high
    By freedomlover in forum Economy
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 17th January 2008, 03:59 PM