5 quick points
1. Nama will give a valuation for an asset which a bank owns of 30% less than book value.
2. Then add 7bn to the total.
3. Judge Peter Kelly says commercial property is 70% off peak.
4 EU competition law, non-distortion of single markets and ecb dictats (see Spanish and Dutch banks) say saying over the odds cannot be done as it is a State Aid.
My questions:
If the above are correct, does that not mean that Nama is doomed?
Will The State end up owning some/all of the banks, however temporarily?
Has anyone or any bank objected to nama as a state aid yet?
If Nama legislation is to take until January, is it Lenny's game to get us to September?
Will the markets not make up their own mind in the interim?



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
