There was just a terrifying interview with Brian Lenihan on 6-1.
For starters, Lenihan called the bottom of the property market. So we now have a Minister for Finance calling the bottom of a market...how much further through the looking glass can we get than that?
But even more worryingly, he openly said that if property prices fall much more from today then we are in "serious trouble". My God, this means there is no slack built into NAMA to accommodate more falls from today. It hadn't occured to me the scheme was this rigid and I didn't expect Lenihan to so freely admit as much. This is mind-blowing to me since another 20% - 40% off today's prices is a near certainty. Christ.
As evidence for his position, Lenihan said further price falls are not likely since yields were at historic highs and were among the highest in Europe. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't yields a function of rents and selling prices? With plunging rental prices (reflecting day-to-day decimation on the ground) and sticky selling prices (reflecting continued delusion among sellers) isn't it obvious that yields only appear high and/or "normal"? Whereas in reality, the asking prices are so out of whack that nominal yields are meaningless.
Finally, Lenihan said we need property to increase in value 10% in 10 years for NAMA to break even. He said this was a modest expectation. So if property falls just another 20% in the next 2 years, that would mean that in the next 8 years after that we'd need the property to increase by some 35%!!! In other words, another bubble between 2011 - 2019. Jesus H. Christ. And even if property IS at the bottom (lol) and flatlines for a couple of years, they are still banking on normal HPI in the 10 years immediately following a massive property crash. Is there a single historical precedent anywhere in the world for this? Surely not.
I am significantly more disturbed about NAMA than I was at lunchtime. FF's wilful self-deception is truly terrifying.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote