Another one? Already?
begins ignore sequence
Another one? Already?
begins ignore sequence
I also thought that I explained why the navy was unable to get the project any priority. To put it bluntly the way the DF is structured the navy has to get any project passed by the Army and the Department. You imply that the navy is at fault. I suggest that the structure in which one arm of the DF dominates decisions to purchase capital items puts the other at a severe disadvantage.
The inverted commas show a disdain for the requirement from the Group, in my opinion. It is difficult for me to understand however why the Government chose to accept this proposal while ignoring the more sensible ones of Closing Cathal Brugha, and disbanding the relic of Upper Class Ireland, the Army Equestrian School. This facility gives the sons and daughters of the wealthy Gymkana circuit the chance to continue their hobby of forcing overpriced horses to jump over assorted posts and railings, while wearing an Army Officers Uniform, and gaining the respect and privelages that comes with that uniform, without ever having to do as much as load a weapon when going on duty. Not even a sword! To top off the cloud cuckoo land in which they live, the unit employs enlisted men and women to clean up after the horses and riders, and take care of their Tack, in the way only members of the working classes can guvn'r.Extend the time-frame of the vessel replacement programme
The D/Defence notes that there is a ‘requirement’ to initiate a vessel replacement programme to
sustain the Naval Service flotilla as certain ships reach the end of their operational lifespan. In the
current budgetary crisis, the Group recommends that this replacement programme be extended over
a longer timeframe than initially envisaged.
Yet these get priority in the Army Heirarchy over replacing rapidly deteriorating Patrol vessels built in the 70s.
Last edited by Insole; 31st August 2012 at 09:16 AM.
The norwegian boats are fast attack boats.
Roar out of the harbour blast something home for tea and medals.
exciting and fun and impressive looking not actually terribly useful for fishery protection patrolling where you might want to stay at sea for more than 24hours.
I have always being amazed with the Irish Government and people and their attitude with anything to do with the sea. The world is full of coastal countries that harness the seas resources in order to have better lives.
We have seen our fisheries massively exploited during the Twentieth Century when thousands of our coastal young people emigrated looking for work. We were told to conserve stocks, while foreign government fishing vessels caught 95% of the fish caught off Ireland's coast.
We are now again witnessing the riffling of our hydrocarbons by multinational companies while again our young people are emigrating, because of the lack of jobs at home.
Can we successfully organise anything? The fact that our Navy has to route their requests via the top brass of the army when looking for new ships etc is proof of our wilful neglect of the bountiful resources that surround us. This at a time when the citizens of Ireland are being victimised, brutalised, robbed blind by our own Government in order to keep International Financial Buccaneers happy; and our seas continue to be quietly plundered by International Fishing and Hydrocarbon Buccaneers.
Why do we Irish people tolerate it when our leaders always bend when threatened by International Bullies?
Woe that we had not the same calibre of leaders that are in Iceland:
- There the International Financial Buccaneers are told go and have a high jump when their banks go pear shaped as a result of gambling debts
- There they go out with trawlers and take on one of the world's Naval Powers whenever their fishing ground limits are threatened.
Maybe, it is not too late to take on the Icelandic and the minority Shell to Sea people's Spirit and fight for our rights and resources, no matter the international opposition gangs, up against us.
Last edited by WTTR; 31st August 2012 at 11:26 AM.
There feasibility as regards Fishery Protection is another matter. Then again, thinking outside the box might be a brave move for some. Winter Fleet/Summer Fleet, East Coast Fleet/West Coast Fleet?
I don't buy the argument that you need something the size of the USS Iowa for fishery protection when your subject vessel, the fisherman is operating a 20 metre fishingboat in exactly the same conditions. I'm not a subject matter expert you understand, but I see a major flaw in your excuses.
Last edited by Insole; 31st August 2012 at 11:21 AM.