femme, why do I keep having to repeat myself for you? That has been explained earlier in the thread. The U.S. pushed prohibition through under the Single Drugs Convention for many reasons, including money. Hemp was threatening cotton, oil and other industries. Also, cannabis was a drug of the native people, not of the white man. It's prohibition was another way to keep the coloureds down. It's all in Martin Booth's "A History of Cannabis" which I recommended earlier in the thread.
I DID NOT SAY THAT IT IS COMPARABLE TO TEA IN EFFECT. I was merely refuting your assertion that if a person appears to be dependent on a substance, that certainly is no reason to criminalise it. I used the example of dependence on tea (my mother is utterly dependent) as an aexample.
Cannabis is like both tea and alcohol in SOME ways and not in others.
It's getting extremely tiresome to have to continually repeat myself. I thought, as a stoner, I'M the one that's supposed to have the bad memory?
Do you really need to misrepresent every single post I make?!?!?!
I DID NOT SAY THAT!!!
I said that I would be more convinced by a doctor who had tried drugs he was treating for than one who hadn't. Personally.
I did not recommend this as a course of action for any particular doctor or for doctors in general for that matter.
Please try actually reading my posts.
No i am sorry, but he is 39, and has smoked heavily since around 19, I agree he is a waster (i have no time for him) but all the side effects and obsessed selfish behavior are real and have slowly come in getting progressively worse. I understand that i am being a bit unfair using someone you don't know as evidence for my case, but i have seen the steady changes in him. I don't know how he would have turned out without heavy cannabis use. (he rolls them and smokes them with the frequency of a heavy cig smoker, little ones that look like normal roll ups.) But i believe he would at least of given a passing dam about others.
I really don't believe that cannabis is worse than alcohol, but don't pretend it is harmless. It most definitely is not.
Cira/rira Not in my name.
I accept your point, however, I feel you are blaming the substance rather than the man. It is easier for you to attribute his behaviour to one particular correlated habit than to accept that something else caused him to develop these problems. Your brother would not have given up on his life had he felt he had something to live for. Obviously he believes that going out, socialising (whatever it is you think he should be doing) is not worth doing. There is some other reason for that but I will hold steadily that it is not cannabis.
Perhaps he is depressed? Perhaps he is just an introverted person? There are a multitude of other possible reasons for his behaviour that I would find more plausible. As I have said, you can only prove correlation, not causation.
You brother smokes cannabis. Your brother lives his life in a way that you feel is wasting it.
Perhaps he has "wasted his life" because he smokes cannabis. Perhaps he smokes cannabis because he is down and is "wasting his life". Perhaps the two factors are completely unrelated. However, you cannot say one way or another, so I would ask you not to draw a relationship of causation where you cannot prove it.
perhaps you could tone down the arrogance enough to admit that i know my brother better than you and have enough wherewithal to spot the changes in his life and connect the dots.
Anyway, i have said i don't care if its legalized. But dont pretend its always safe. it is not.
I have not read the entire thread. Has every person with real personel experiance come under this sort of attack.
you could take a leaf out of cato's book and learn to discuss all the issues honestly.
EDIT I posted this before seeing your latest post. you have come back their with some good points i disagree with, but i am going to but out now, this subject is to personell, more so than i realized before my 1st post.
Cira/rira Not in my name.
scractchnsniff, I am not attacking you. I am merely attacking your flawed argument. You CANNOT draw an assumption of causation from a correlation. Cannot. Full stop.
That's it.
I have no problem discussing issues honestly. I just don't suffer fools gladly. Cato is a gentleman with fantastic manners. I am just a scruffy student with a big mouth - I cannot always match his eloquence.
Now - once more. Prove causation in an acceptable generalisable manner. Please.
I too have known someone like this and wondered if it was the effects of the cannabis that made them that way. The case I know of stopped smoking cannabis (really heavy smoker) and started drinking. Complete disaster, he became violent.
I did spend some time talking to this person and discovered a complete mish-mash of contradictory beliefs, really low self-esteem, and an aggressive attitude towards society in general. I feel that he had real problems, whatever caused them I do not know, but am sure he would not have wished them on himself.
I have no doubt that someone like that person I know is way better smoking than drinking albeit a veritable vegetable.
The crazy thing is that your brother can and will consume cannabis regardless of whether it is illegal or not. The argument for the legalisation is very much tied to this fact. For the 99.9% of people who smoke it, there will always be a small % that should not, same with alcohol and across the counter pharmaceuticals.