I am puzzeled and confused by John Gormely and his remarks to local authoritys and the EPA lately. As you know from the news the EPA is concerned about the amount of sewage leakage by local authorities. John Gormely thinks that the EPA should fine local authorities for not sampleing. Thats brilliant. Yes it may make them correct the sampleing problem but it raises another problem in my opinion.
If the EPA fine local authorities, does that mean the local authorities must divert funds from public services to pay for these fines? What does the EPA do with the money it receives from the fine? Surly the only people who gain from this couse of action is legal depts etc! It takes money from local authorities and sends it to stupid places I imagine!
Is it not a far greater idea to tell local authorities that if they do not sample the water etc the EPA will hire consultants to do it and bill the local authorities. No fines and the work is done! Problem solved! If the bill is not paid by local authorities funds can then be diverted from the local authority by goverment! No Solicitors, No legal fees!
It just seems daft to fine a local authority at the moment when funds are being cut already! More importantly its actually us who suffer with a cut in services!



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote