
Originally Posted by
Conor
No, constructive dismissal is something completely different.
If Tesco's argument is that the first Douglas store is being completely wound up (i.e. that the business of the first store is not being transferred to the second), and all staff are being made redundant accordingly, this would be covered by the Protection of Employment (Exceptional Collective Redundancies and Related Matters) Act 2007. The burden of proof would be on them to prove to an independent Redundancy Panel that these are genuine redundancies, and not just an unsubtle attempt to circumvent their obligations to their staff. Not a hope of that.
On the other hand, if the undertaking is simply being transferred from Douglas I to Douglas II, this would be covered by the Transfer of Undertakings legislation. Either way, there's little to no chance of any court upholding Tesco's actions, imho.