Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 53 of 53

Thread: 100,000s Of Private Conversations To Be Recorded

  1. #51
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,594

    Quote Originally Posted by merle haggard View Post
    which is garda incompetence in a city wre gardai were too busy bringing wrongful prosecutions against a man who had the temerity to make a complaint to gardai that the minister of defence punched him and proceeded to try and strangle him in a public bar .
    Just to clarify...

    Is the 32CSM fully supportive of efforts to arrest and prosecute the members of Limerick's criminal underworld..?
    Last edited by Silvio Dante; 18th April 2009 at 09:13 PM.

  2. #52
    Politics.ie Member Digout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    at the bar, where the sock puppets are
    Posts
    13,675

    What really scares me is the fact that the revenue people are gonna be allowed use this technology.

    We are def heading towards a police state, that Clowen painting was scary, this just confirms whats happening.

  3. #53
    Politics.ie Regular cakeordeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    your computer screen
    Posts
    1,095

    Quote Originally Posted by Factorem View Post
    Under the Surveillance Bill, thousands and thousands of hours of conversations are to be bugged and listened in to, stored indefinitely, and searched through using state-of-the-art semantic search engines. It's like something out of an Orwell novel.

    These kinds of laws only impinge on the right to privacy of law-abiding citizens. The scumbags in Limerick will find ways around the surveillance, whilst innocent people get picked out by the automated software systems and their private conversations are listened in on.

    How will the speech recognition systems cope with the Limerick knacker accent? If the Moyross locals think their calls are being recorded and stored, they'll speak with even worse knacker accents so the automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems will go haywire. The gardai/army will need to put huge effort into training their systems to recognise Limerick/Dublin knackers and it's unlikely they have the expertise – i.e. it's the innocent people who speak normally are the ones who are going to end up being picked out for saying something slightly “out of the ordinary”. Also, if I'm picked up by one of these algorithms, how long are my private conversations going to be stored on some Garda computer?

    Mary McAleese would want to grow a pair and send this bill back to the Supreme Court. I don't want to live in a parnoid surveillance state where everyone is looking over their shoulder all the time. She's made little impact sofar and this would be a chance for her to make some kind of a mark.

    The Limerick knackers won't be long getting themselves 3G-enabled phones with a readily available encrypted chat/voice package installed. The Gardai/Army won't be able to do a thing about that unless they've got some quantum computer in the basement of Harcourt Street. Innocent people certainly won't be using counter-surveillance technology.

    Then there's those laser microphones that are used by police forces all over the world. If you know the Gardai have the technology, it's not hard to protect yourself against their intrusion.
    Ah but at least if they do get something , now it is admissible as evidence. You give these loons a lot of cred for being counter-surveillance savvy.

    Godhelpus but one of them recently gave a lesson on how to shoot someone in the head...and well...poor man over-illustrated the point.

    The runners and gofers wont be able to outwit the surveillance at every turn. Some don't have a basic schooling not to mind even being able to follow Quantum of solace. The runners are not the brains and this is where mistakes are made.

    There are surveillance techniques that 'we' don't know about.

    Anything and everything that exists should be used against them. Now it can be. One of the most infuriating things for a guard is not being able to admit incriminating surveillance evidence. Good, that this will change. I'm glad.

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 44
    Last Post: 17th January 2012, 10:38 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 7th July 2009, 12:22 PM
  3. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 14th December 2008, 01:16 PM
  4. FG Stamp duty policy to threaten 1,000s of jobs - Cowen
    By shaneholden in forum Fianna Fáil
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 1st May 2007, 12:20 PM
  5. 459 drink drive incidents recorded at weekend
    By David Cochrane in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 31st October 2006, 01:24 PM