I understand that senior managers in the BBC had death threats issued against them when Jerry Springer: The Opera was due to be aired.Originally Posted by FutureTaoiseach
I understand that senior managers in the BBC had death threats issued against them when Jerry Springer: The Opera was due to be aired.Originally Posted by FutureTaoiseach
Failed liberal traitors:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I personnally think it's in the national interest now at this stage.. People on this Island need to know how easy it is to really piss-off our Middle-East & North African Neighbours.. And a picture speaks a thousand words.. It'll also take the heat off Denmark somewhat, and re-enforce our press freedoms within the EU.
The one thing I know is I can't know anything else...
The entry of Turkey is not related to this topic. There's been a strong reaction in denamrk among the Muslim community there too. Prehaps we should throw them out of the EU too.Originally Posted by FutureTaoiseach
By the way, no one likes a supremisist.
"Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative."
Oscar Wilde
No it wouldn't. It wouldn't make a blind bit of difference to press freedoms within the EU, which vary from state to state.Originally Posted by Simon.D
I don't see any reason why Irish newspapers should be restricted from printing the cartoon. I'd certainly think editors should take into consideration the possible offence it might cause if they did print it, and bear that in mind when making the decision whether to print it or not (and this applies to every picture that may be considered offensive, whether religious or not). But printing it simply because people find it offensive (and, therefore, to show how easy it is to offend people) seems to me to be, at the very least, just a little childish. I find it very hard to see any convincing 'national interest' argument here.
Failed liberal traitors:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
fair play simon.d - you nailed that one.Originally Posted by Simon.D
and fair play to those european papers who joined forces to print.
That's complete nonsense. I disagree with you.
The sketches were offensive. (Maybe not to you or I, but to many others) They were designed to be controversial. Had the Danish paper printed homophobic cartoons, and were condemned by gay activists, would people here call for them to be reprinted in Ireland, just to defend press freedom like.
By the way, the editor of France Soir, who reprinted the cartoons was sacked today. Just because Christians don't get upset when people poke fun at their God, doesn't mean Muslims should have the same submissive attitude.
Just 1 gram of cocaine destroys 4m2 of tropical rainforest. Give it up ya selfish b'stards.
They are entitled to protest but the reaction hardly fits the 'crime'. Protesting is quite acceptable. Burning flags is par for the course.Originally Posted by Bogwarrior
Threatening the lives innocent citizens of a state because a newspaper in their country printed offensive images is a million miles over the top.
"Modern cynics and skeptics ... see no harm in paying those to whom they entrust the minds of their children a smaller wage than is paid to those to whom they entrust the care of their plumbing."
Yes. Ask Theo van gogh (if you could) how 'upset' Muslims get.Originally Posted by newFF
The first thing to go if Muslims got into power here would be individualism, civil liberties, gay rights, equality etc that have evolved here slowly and steadily since the Age of Enlightenment while the Mid East stagnates. Nothing to do with imperialism or any of that crap.
It makes sense that the first battle would be along those lines in the modern era. It's a natural fault line.
That's complete nonsense. I disagree with you.
Would Irish Catholics have reacted hysterically say in the 1960's? I would think so and in the average Irish town, it would have been a brave soul who would have risked public "blasphemy," unless it was against say the Protestant vicar.Originally Posted by FutureTaoiseach
Change takes time - just wonder about the big issue that's made of Stringfellow's lapdance club and contrast the hysteria of many Irish about sex issues with the attitude of the Dutch.
Many Dutch would think that our attitude towards prostitution for example is backward.
So we should be careful about casting stones and having some dubious litmus tests of tolerence.
I lived in a Muslim country for 5 yrs and I recall a Syrian saying with an expression of incomprehension: "I heard that homosexuals are allowed meet in clubs in Europe."
I explained that progressive European countries do not have freedoms for some of the population and not for others.
We should expect tolerance from people who come to Europe but having tests is another matter.
Believe those who search for truth. Doubt those who claim to have found it -André Gide (1869-1951) Nobel Laureate 1947
You're missing the point MH. It's not a switch - tolerance/intolerance. There's a world of a scale of difference between controversy, intolerant attitudes to blasphemy in the 60s and actually killing someone, fatwas and the like.Originally Posted by MichaelHennigan
That's complete nonsense. I disagree with you.