Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Google - Champions of Internet Privacy

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Dublin South East
    Posts
    2,641

    Google - Champions of Internet Privacy

    Google refuse to cooperate with State Dept

    When is the government going to far? I have no problem with using these records to catch paedophile etc..

    But when the search engine is used to harass anti-war activist, how many people would be willing to Google (Bush should be arrested for war crimes) if you know the State Dept in America is going to see who is asking the question.

    Fair Play to Google!
    The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member KingKane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Here and there.
    Posts
    14,756
    Twitter
    @

    Actually, the US government isn't planning to use this stuff to catch paedophiles. Their intent is to demostrate that porngraphic images can be accessed by children without any attempt to validate their age.

    Essentially, a 15 year can look at dirty pictures. The overreeach is in the US governments request to all search records for a defined time period irrespective of their nature. All the results of classic conservative double talk on big government.
    Dan Sullivan. I was back but we still couldn't all have a vote.
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Regular Pidge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    9,701

    I don't know how true it is, but Google Watch is interesting.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    56

    Re: Google - Champions of Internet Privacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim84
    Google refuse to cooperate with State Dept

    When is the government going to far? I have no problem with using these records to catch paedophile etc..

    But when the search engine is used to harass anti-war activist, how many people would be willing to Google (Bush should be arrested for war crimes) if you know the State Dept in America is going to see who is asking the question.

    Fair Play to Google!
    How would that even be legal?
    Economic Left/Right: -3.63
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.62

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Dublin South East
    Posts
    2,641

    Re: Google - Champions of Internet Privacy

    Quote Originally Posted by keira
    How would that even be legal?
    The court issued a subpoena for the 5 biggest search engines to hand over the information ... only Google refused
    The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    56

    How many people searched for 2 + 2 = 5, I wonder?
    Economic Left/Right: -3.63
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.62

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Dublin South East
    Posts
    2,641

    Quote Originally Posted by keira
    How many people searched for 2 + 2 = 5, I wonder?
    Results 1 - 10 of about 51,600,000 for 2+2=5

    The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,399

    Quote Originally Posted by KingKane
    Actually, the US government isn't planning to use this stuff to catch paedophiles. Their intent is to demostrate that porngraphic images can be accessed by children without any attempt to validate their age.

    Essentially, a 15 year can look at dirty pictures. The overreeach is in the US governments request to all search records for a defined time period irrespective of their nature. All the results of classic conservative double talk on big government.
    The US supreme court has already ruled that it's the parents job to regulate what their kids do on the net, not the govt, in the same case they struck down the Communications Decency Act as unconstitutional.

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    56

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim84
    Quote Originally Posted by keira
    How many people searched for 2 + 2 = 5, I wonder?
    Results 1 - 10 of about 51,600,000 for 2+2=5

    Well I thought it was funny. Just goes to show the American inadequacy. They're 22 years behind schedule!
    Economic Left/Right: -3.63
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.62

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Dublin South East
    Posts
    2,641

    Quote Originally Posted by Gladstone
    The US supreme court has already ruled that it's the parents job to regulate what their kids do on the net, not the govt, in the same case they struck down the Communications Decency Act as unconstitutional.
    My layman’s understanding of this latest subpoena is to show ho w easy it is to find pornography on the internet, and are rewriting the law.
    The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 'The End of Privacy'
    By Mariella Froster in forum Foreign Affairs
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26th January 2008, 10:47 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21st January 2008, 09:25 AM
  3. New privacy bill
    By nixmix in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 21st September 2006, 06:44 PM