LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
So what is the story anyways about the Occult side of the New World Order, what do people mean by that exactly?
Well obviously people are saying that there is some group out there who are aiming for this New World Order thing, which is an attempt to form a world government. There are obviously various theories as to who this group is but generally they all boil down to what nearly all American commentators call the Illuminati. So anyway I thought I would stick my neck into the lion's jawand attempt to describe what people say this group is and what they are actually up to. I wish to point out that this only an opinion, I have no proof of these statements, or anything very substantial to back up the list of names given, but I think giving one's opinion is an important function of political discourse in a democratic society and is protected, and should be protected, by the traditions and laws of the land. Anybody can just listen to the links given on the Illuminati and make up their own mind and of course it goes without saying that I do not agree with everything explained in those links.
What is the Illuminati?
So what are people referring to anyway when they talk about the Illuminati? Well this is just a general name that arrived in the late 18th century for the organisation of the various Occult groups that existed at that time. By Occult groups we simply mean those who follow a kind of anti-Christian religion e.g. Satanists and Luciferians etc. So we are talking about a large (they probably number in the millions, certainly hundreds of thousands, and are organised all across the world) disparate collection of groups who co-operate, sometimes loosely, because they are all aiming to destroy the Christian heritage of the world and to usher in a new 'paradise' on earth, where they would be dictators in what is now known as the New World Order. To understand its structure just look at the Christian religion and imagine if you had a smaller version of that then that's what the Occult world looks like. Hence, in the Christian world, you have various denominations which might have close or loose links to a centralised body, like the way that the Church of England or Orthodox Churches might sometimes recognise or cooperate with the Vatican, but they are really only united by an overall aim to further the Christian word as outlined in the gospel etc and can be identified by the use of universal Christian symbols like the cross, books like the Bible and prayers like the Our Father. That's then how you can identify Occult groups, by the same use of particular symbols and books, and the basic unity they have is simply that they are aiming for this destruction of normal civilisation and its supplanting by the NWO.
The Illuminati word arose when a person called Adam Weishupt founded a particular secret society on May the first 1776 that drew up a specific plan to destroy all nation states, all religions, all marks of normal civilisation, and all private property. You can read more about the progress of this 'conspiracy' by reading this book by a French Jesuit writing in 1798: Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia . Anyway that's the basic allegation that's made in these 'conspiracy theories', that that secret society is still in existence and still working to undermine the sovereignty of all independent states, all religions and all private property. As well as Weishupt, some personalities associated with this group include Voltaire, Frederick the Great, Caliostro, Mazzini, Marx, Palmerston, Lemmi - a late 19th century Italian politician -, a mid 19th century American General called Pike, and Aleister Crowley, who was involved in the Anarchist Movement among many other things.
The overall philosophy that is said to motivate the 'Illuminati' is easy to understand, its simply the opposite of what the traditional Christian religions believe or believed in. In other words if you take the 10 commandments, or whatever, and reversed them then that's what this group believes in! And this is not an accident, these groups are very far from being atheists or non believers in the importance of the Bible etc, they are simply taking every reference from there to Lucifer and Our Lord and are making sure to further the former's aims and frustrate the latter's! This can even extend to a close reading of the Book of Revelation in order to help to create the state where their hero, the Antichrist, can come into the world.
Illuminati's Agenda for Society
The progress of this 'conspiracy', if you like, is where the Illuminati is said to exert its influence through the media and educational systems to further its aims of bringing about the NWO. The best description of this process seems to have been given by a former KGB officer called Yuri Bezmenov, because the techniques used by this 'conspiracy' seem to be very similar to old USSR techniques. What he described is that you can brainwash the general public in a country to assist or acclimatise themselves to losing their independence - remember that's the aim of the NWO, each country has to agree to surrender its sovereignty as part of bringing about a one world government - by following this three step process:
a) You enter into a long 20 year or so process of stripping out the morals in the general public - he calls that 'demoralisation' - in order to help to create a population who have a kind of blank slate that these people can then write on, so to speak. This stage takes a long time because the education system is one of the important elements of it and you have to wait for the generation that you educated to come into political power. I will describe this in more detail below.
b) Then you have 2 or 3 years of a more obviously destabilised state of society. You see its important to understand that during the above phase its easier to accomplish it if the general public are kind of asleep, entertained by sport etc and feeling that there is no great political 'conspiracy' working on their society. Then for the second phase you reverse this somewhat and you create divisions and confusion in the country. Bezmenov particularly gives the example of labour relations, during this period you create divisions between employers and employees so that it seems as if the country and society cannot hold together at all.
c) The third phase was named, with deliberate irony, by the KGB as 'normalisation'. This just means that you roll in the tanks from the foreign country to take over and now run the country with an order that seemed to be impossible when it was independent.
This long term brainwashing process, that he described as the first phase, is a bit complicated but maybe could be explained if we take a kind of hypothetical, fictional, analogy. Ok imagine the scene in Cambodia after the Khmer Rouge took over. You have nearly all the population housed in Communist re-education camps, listening to Communist propaganda broadcast over loud speakers and guards patrolling the perimeters etc. Now say you have been given an assignment by the Khmer Rouge govt. You are called in as some hotshot New York PR guru and your mission, should you choose to accept it
Ok fair enough, now how are you going to do that? You see if you think about it what you are trying to do is mould the sense of right and wrong of your population. Currently the people do not think that working for the Khmer Rouge and following their instructions is 'right', they have their own version of what is right and wrong and they only follow the govts instructions because they have to, because the guards with the machine guns compel them to. Your job is to find out what is it that gives them their current sense of right and wrong, get rid of it from the population, and then supplant it with a sense that following the govt's - the Khmer Rouge's - instructions to the letter is what is 'right'.
Its easy enough to figure out where they get their current sense of right and wrong, maybe from three specific sources:
a) From their religion, so this must be got rid of straight away. You need to get those media outlets to mock their religion all the time and water down or abolish religion from the educational system. Bezmenov, at the end of one of the lectures, specifically stated that religion was the great opponent of this process, its imperative to strip out that first.
b) From their families. Obviously their parents might inculcate a value system into their children, so actually you need to abolish the family structures if you can. It would be better if parents split up, or you have widespread illegitimacy, or even had children raised by the state.
c) From local community structures which might foster a given 'code' of ethics. So if you can mess that up, create new communities where strangers try to live together and 'regenerate' old communities by separating old neighbours, that might be the way to go. You can promote that on a global scale too by fostering widespread immigration and emigration.
If you can rid people of this previous sense of right and wrong then you are ready to implant a new sense of right and wrong, the one that gets people to follow the Khmer Rouge's instructions without question. So how are you going to do this, what's the plan anyway? Well how about this, how about creating a kind of 'cult of the law'. Now the law at this time in Cambodia is simply the instructions that the Khmer Rouge have drawn up to control their people. The law states that the general public must stay in those camps and work for the Khmer Rouge. Hence if people just follow the law blindly they will be following the Khmer Rouge's instructions, which is the brainwashing that the Khmer Rouge asked you to implant in people. So say you hype up the whole majesty of the law. Maybe you could broadcast soap operas where the arcane workings of the law are described in great depth, which would give the law greater prestige and status and also disguise the reality that the modern Cambodian law is just the Khmer Rouge's instructions, they abolished the old legal rights and customs and made new modern laws in all areas which just embodied their dictatorial instructions for the general public. (Btw one helpful thing about the latter process, the process of getting rid of old rights like that, is to create a kind of 'cult of change' so that the general public would automatically look on as old fashioned the old rights and clamour for a 'modern' reworking of the law.) So that's one way that you could brainwash the general public to follow blindly this corrupt government's instructions and you can now collect your check with a job well done!
That then is something like the process that is alleged to be occurring in modern society. So maybe you, O reader!, have also been brainwashed like this? You think not? Not you surely, you are above all that? lol. Maybe you are an atheist who doesn't believe in all that religious 'hocus pocus'? Did you ever stop to think that maybe you are a product of the fact that detailed comprehensive teaching of theology was stripped out of the school curriculum in Ireland in the mid70s, maybe if you knew the details that underlined the old religious principles you wouldn't be as dismissive of them? Did you ever stop to think about the portrayal of religion in the modern media? I just saw the film 'The name of the Rose' sometime ago and it is very striking how much the monks were deformed ugly looking people, as opposed to the heroes who were, bizarrely and unhistorically, standing up for laughter and learning that the church was supposed to be trying to suppress. How many portrayals like that does one see in films and does that subliminally influence people? Look at the question of supplanting the 'cult of the law': how many soap operas or TV series have been created recently which go into the details of legal proceedings and which could be subliminally implanting that as a sense of 'right and wrong' in people? I can think of 'Law and Order', 'Boston Legal', 'Judge John Deed' and actually countless others that have grown up in the last 15 years or so. Think about the OJ Simpson trial, admittedly it was a newsworthy topic but is it not remarkable that it was broadcast live for about a year on television all over the world?
Anyway that kind of process is what it is said the 'Illuminati' are promoting in modern day society.
Mind/Brain Programming
One complicated topic that is tied in with this cult is the question of the creation of multiple personalities and mind/brain programming. I am just describing this technology here because if you follow some of the Illuminati links in the bibliography you won't know what the people are talking about otherwise. This is a very complex and secret technology that it is said this cult uses on its members.
The simplest way to understand all that is to look upon the mind as working like a computer. The basic, 'low level', 'brain' that a computer has is the BIOS, which in turn controls and co-ordinates all the various parts of the computer like the hard drive, internet connection, etc. But it itself is a small 'brain' if you like, it only feeds the information in and out to the hard drive where all the big serious computer programmes are. When you talk about the great memory capacity of the computer or the big mathematical calculations or automation etc you are referring to the hard drive which is the much bigger and comprehensive part of the computer, but nonetheless is 'inferior' if you like to the BIOS. The latter is the essential 'commander' of the system as it were, and the computer can work, in a limited sense, without the hard drive but not without the BIOS. Also since the BIOS works at this low level, theoretically anyway, programmes running on the BIOS, like clock functions etc, work faster than the hard drive ones because they can run in a purer simpler state, before the overhang of running the hard drive kicks in and which delays things somewhat.
Anyway apparently the Occult world discovered that the human brain works a little like that. What they aimed to do was to access the low level brain functions, the BIOS equivalent of the brain, and in using that they could develop 'purer' faster brain functions like great strength and a photographic memory etc. Also if you could access the mind at this 'core' level you could even install the brain's equivalent of a new hard drive, a new personality, creating people with multiple personalities and which helps greatly in preserving the cult's secrets. The question is how do you access the 'BIOS' of the mind while the normal mind is still functioning? There are various ways:
a) Hypnosis. That's what the hypnotist is doing, as you can see in TV shows etc, the hypnotist dulls the main brain into a kind of sleep state and instead speaks directly to the 'BIOS' of the brain and gives it simple instructions. So hence the person can be instructed to act like a monkey etc, and this primitive brain state will know enough to be able to act out this monkey state but not know enough to realise that this is a foolish thing to do on a stage.
b) Trauma. You know the phrase 'scared out of you wits'? Well that seems to be a recognition of a kind of state where, if you don't die or faint, you sort of 'lose your mind' when you are very scared or in great pain. In that state you can talk to and give messages to the primitive brain just like under hypnosis.
c) There are various other tricks and drugs etc that can be used. For example if you are in a state where your senses are not being used then you might enter into this semi-hypnotic state e.g. if you were placed floating in a water tank, where you have a feeling of weightlessness, where it was permanently dark and silent so you couldn't use your hearing or sight senses, and where you have some kind of all round rubber body suit so that you couldn't use your sense of touch. Also another trick could be if you permanently hold a person's eyes open and flash across the eye very quickly some kind of information, it might be absorbed by the primitive brain and bypass the main brain. This is because the BIOS of the brain, as it were, can read faster than the main brain. The same could be tried by speeding up the playing of recorded sounds of voices speaking to the victim, because again the 'primitive brain' can pick up and hear things which are said too fast to be absorbed by the main brain.
In any case that's the general outlines of this enormously complicated subject which you can read a bit more of here if you like: http://www.politics.ie/current-affai...-agencies.html .
Race
This is an important subject tied up with the 'conspirators' agenda. I think that an over emphasis on the horrors of WWII should not be allowed to disguise the fact that race is a very important component of society. The structure and cohesion of any country rests to a very large extent on the racial characteristics of the people in that country. Look at it this way, if you planted a thousand people of old English stock on some deserted island somewhere you would notice that the island would begin to resemble England after a few years even if the inhabitants had never actually lived in England! You can see examples of that kind of thing happening all over the world in the outposts of the old Empire, you see in practice a lot of what makes a society tick is in the genes of the people. These genetic characteristics are in turn important to the conspirators as they judge how societies will react to the creation of a NWO.
The point is that some races have a kind of 'superiority complex' and some have the opposite, obviously an 'inferiority complex'. So what happens is that races with the former are more likely to be determined opponents of the NWO, because in their sense of 'superiority' they feel that they know best how to run a country and don't want to be told how to do things by a world government, whereas the other type are more likely to accept the wisdom that would be handed down to them by this international institution and world media, they would not feel confident enough to go against a kind of world consensus in favour of the NWO. Its obvious that this 'superiority complex' tends to be held by the white races of North Western Europe, say the White Anglo Saxon Protestant, French, Dutch and Swiss peoples, and an 'inferiority complex' of some type is usually felt by nearly all other races, especially the non white ones. Before I am accused of being 'racist' I should point out that I am Irish and I think a lot of this 'inferiority complex' is quite characteristic of Irish people, as it is among many of the Latin races that the Irish resemble, and even a little bit among the Eastern European races e.g. if you follow Russian history you can see how much the Russians tended to look up to the French in the 19th century and to the US, bizarrely I know, in the 20th century, so showing this inferiority complex. The English, on the other hand, never seemed to feel any place is as good as England, or any language as good as English, and the WASP type Americans feel much the same way!
Of course this is a general attitude, its not a reflection of people's intelligence or a reflection of the truth of a country's superiority, during some eras and in some matters England is not a superior country but try telling them that (especially if you could speak to them in the 19th century say)! Whereas in Ireland 'an Irish solution to an Irish problem' is a political insult, its a way of laughing at a given policy. If you approach some government TD or Minister, especially a Fianna Fáil one who supposedly represent a kind of 'purer' Irish nationalism, with a proposed policy in a given area they will ask where this policy has been done before. In other words unless it has been done before in the UK or the US or wherever then they don't want to know, there is no way they would implement a policy before those countries. Its remarkable too how many Irish literary or art figures got recognition of their genius in places like the UK and the US, in many cases Irish people wouldn't acknowledge their merit at all until they were applauded abroad.
This then has political significance. Take the recent Lisbon II referendum for example. In practice when you are trying to persuade a person to oppose the EU you have a big problem because at the end of the day Irish people look up to these foreign institutions. They imagine that the clever well organised countries of Europe couldn't be cooking up something that could be that terrible, it must be better than the banjaxed country Irish people have messed up here etc. The inferiority complex helps to sell the supra-national institution to the country, and this is the model that the 'conspirators' see as being used to create their NWO. The French and the Dutch on the other hand (as would the English if they were ever asked) solidly turned down the new EU constitution, they had the confidence to see the thing on its merits, they weren't swayed by the inferiority complex.
You see if we ever have a proposal to create a new world government I think it would look like the creation of the League of Nations, or the United Nations, or the convening of Vatican II. In all these cases you had a huge outpouring of joy expressed in the international media, and among international statesmen, about how this was a great step to further international peace and co-operation among peoples - and religions in the case of the oecumenical thrust of Vatican II - etc. That is what the creation of the NWO will look like and you have to ask how will the different races and countries react to that. When the League of Nations was created as far as I know no country really objected to it except the US which shocked everybody by throwing out the proposal in the US Senate. The only country to doggedly oppose joining the UN for decades, as opposed to those countries who were forbidden from joining, was Switzerland. As regards Vatican II the first country to show a lack of enthusiasm for the media generated hype was England, where the English Catholics immediately negotiated a special opt out from the new liturgy. Then afterwards opposition to Vatican II started up and blossomed in France, and French speaking Switzerland, and the US. In all these cases you will find that the governments representing the non WASP or North Western European races clamoured to get involved with what the international media said was great. They just went with the flow, and this 'inferiority complex' is a large part of the reason for that.
Which brings us to the 'conspirators' agenda with respect to race. For them its simple, for the above mentioned reason, they want to crush those white races that have this 'superiority complex'. Actually they want to breed them out of existence. So we do have a racial war if you like and its simply a war against white people, but particularly the English, American, French, and North West European races in general. You can see it in the elevation of the African American race in the US, the huge immigration of other races into all the main white countries, and the fall of the white regimes in Africa and India etc.
Again I think that people should look at this rationally and see the agenda without being swayed by media name calling etc. The thing is too that these 'conspirators' themselves are genuinely racist in that they look upon their group as a kind of master race and only allow arranged marriages among their 'elite' families. Maybe this is why they take such an interest in the world races and are so keen to alter their makeup.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by eoghanacht
