Leaving your own politics aside (harder for some than others I know !) and just trying to put yourself in the shoes of BC this afternoon - what would you do?
There's the traditional approach - poll very disappointing, snapshot, reflects the anger, we communicated badly . . . but . . . hard decisions never popular, job to do, not paid to be popular (ed: kinda are though really !), will listen but won't shirk from the responsibility etc etc etc etc
My personal view is that the poll is a massive wake up call but I'm unsure he has the wherewithall to heed it. If I were he I would sack my Finance Minister. I'm sorry BL but ultimately you phucked up - yes we all helped you and supported your phucking up but a ballsed up budget rests with MoF. I say sack but in reality I would actually move you over to Justice again. This is your forte and I think you do have an intellect which will be of benefit to the cabinet in time.
New Minister for Finance - Mr. Dermot Ahern.
I would then roll back on a number of the cutbacks. I would not change the rollback of universality on cards for the over 70s. I would however at least double the limits from their current level - someone with an income in retirement of 65k+ or a couple with 130k+ do NOT need a free medical card. I would cut the doctor payment from 640 to 400 per patient. I would roll back on the majority of the education cuts apart from the uncertified sick leave one - that's a daft one and should have been changed before now. I would row back on the class size and the cuts in the special schemes etc. I would leave the agriculture cuts as they are.
I would fund the gap that would now exist (having rowed back on many big cuts above !) with an across the board 7.5% pay cut wef Jan 2009.
I would then publicly apologise for making a balls out of it. Highlight the need for further reform of the tax and public service, highlight the need for everyone to commit to helping the economy through this difficult period.
That approach is in line with what the opposition and unions have called for - namely cuts that are not aimed at children or vulnerable.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
