I believe it was Corelli Barnet, author of Britain and Her Army, who remarked that that force had been established in the 17th Century to crush the Catholic Irish.
Nearly four centuries later General Frank Kitson, the counter-insurgency expert, said its task was to squeeze the Catholics until they vomited forth the IRA.
There is a nice consistency between the original task and the longest campaign recently completed, and commemorated in London's St Paul's Cathedral.
On the face of it there appears to be no such consistency in the Irish Defence Forces which trace their origin to the Irish Citizen Army and the Irish Volunteers, still less than one century ago.
The Citizen Army famously paraded before a banner proclaiming "We Serve Neither King nor Kaiser - But Ireland!" in March 1916, the same month in which James Connolly's three-act play "Under Which Flag" was staged in Liberty Hall.
A month later it merged with the Irish Volunteers into what Connolly called "the Army of the Irish Republic". So began a war FOR independence. The Irish Volunteers had been founded in 1913 to defend Ireland's rights.
Independence was not and has not been achieved, which is why, unlike the USA or India, for instance, Ireland does not celebrate an Independence Day. In recent decades the Defence Forces make up for this lack of opportunity for National rejoicing by parading with the Royal British Legion on Armistice Day, a privilege once accorded to the Dublin branch of the British Union of Fascists.
The reason that independence was not won is that the British Army , its armed and its political auxiliaries successfully stood in its way.
Of course some progress was made towards independence, and when advocating the Stepping Stone approach Michael Collins had this to say-
"Our army, if it exists for honourable purposes only, will draw to it honourable men. It will call to it the best men of our race - men of skill and culture. It will not be recruited as many modern armies are, from those who are industrially useless.
Our army exist only for the defence of our liberties. An Irish army can never be used for the ignoble purpose of invasion, subjugation and exploitation.
I believe that the general culture of the Defence Forces reflected this vision. In the 1950s recruiting campaigns invoked patriot soldiers from the time of Eoghan Ruadh O'Neill to the Boys who bate the Black and Tans.
Until the 1970s the Military College at the Curragh invited applications for Cadetship under the slogan "an rod sa Romham"
suggesting martyrdom in the manner of Pearse.
Imagine my surprise and disgust as an ex-Summer soldier and sunshine patriot of the FCA to read in the continuing dispute over Irishmen in British uniforms, two ex-Captains of the Irish army maintaining that the nation, the State and the citizens should rank Irishmen who, in British uniform forced Opium on China, in French uniform put down the Paris Commune, in American uniform waged genocidal war against native Americans on the same plane as Wolfe Tone, Emmet, Pearse, Liam Lynch and Michael Collins, and above that of such altruistic patriots as Bobby Sands.
Such ex-Captains as Donal Buckley of Mayo would dismiss me and those who think like me as "immature". They regard themselves as mature, just as those who sell pornography label their wares as "adult" literature and "adult" movies.
Long ago Cicero declared that those who are ignorant of history are stuck in adolescence. Captain Buckley and those who have taken his side in the argument, remind me of the teenage love song of Sam Cook - "don't know much about history, don't know much about etc. etc.
I may of course have erred on the side of charity. Perhaps they DO know history and have consciously chosen to glorify the ignoble roles of invasion, subjugation and exploitation.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote