Extracts from the most recent report by the CAG, John Purcell:
With respect to applications for PPS numbers, he says
The consequences of such fraudulent applications areAcceptance of asylum seekers’ identity cards conflicted with the rigid demands made of other
applicants.
Some action has been taken to combat this, though obviously not enough:Many bogus applicants already had PPS numbers and frequently were asylum seekers in receipt of state benefits
• The use of bogus PPS numbers was giving their holders entitlements to welfare benefits
• The internal evaluation in 2000 tested a random sample of 1,593 PPS numbers issued to purported EU applicants (deemed high risk). 10% of these turned out to have been fraudulently obtained.
There was also a significant number of ‘suspicious’ other cases.
• The internal evaluation in 2000 estimated losses at €25 million to €50 million per annum
• PPS numbers could be used to help open bank accounts, obtain credit cards etc.
One short and limited study revealed:In 2003, the Department established a liaison with the Garda National Immigration Bureau. This liaison has resulted in estimated monthly savings of approximately €300,000 mainly from asylum seekers involved in identity and welfare fraud.
Finally, of the bogus applications for PPS numbers that were actually detected as being fraudulent in 2004, only 1 from 324 was from an Irish person, ie 99.7% of the identified fraudsters were foreignersChecks over a 2-week period at the public counter of the Central Revenue Information Office cast doubts on the validity of the identity of 70 callers who presented a PPS number at the counter.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote