Well that is if you correlate the value of transactions through the Post Office for money sent abroad.
It appears that since 2000 the volume of these transactions has increased by 600%. Most of the growth has been fueled by foreign workers sending back money to their families.
42% was to European Countries.
23% to Asian Countries
24% to African Countries
and the rest to North and South America.
Anyone else think what I'm thinking?
Europa Conventus Delenda Est
Yes, Africans must emigrate to find jobs.Originally Posted by Catalpa
Well that is if you correlate the value of transactions through the Post Office for money sent abroad.
It appears that since 2000 the volume of these transactions has increased by 600%. Most of the growth has been fueled by foreign workers sending back money to their families.
42% was to European Countries.
23% to Asian Countries
24% to African Countries
and the rest to North and South America.
Anyone else think what I'm thinking?
MJ Coughlan,
Waterford City.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Unless you're thinking that you're stupid, then I doubt it.Well that is if you correlate the value of transactions through the Post Office for money sent abroad.
It appears that since 2000 the volume of these transactions has increased by 600%. Most of the growth has been fueled by foreign workers sending back money to their families.
42% was to European Countries.
23% to Asian Countries
24% to African Countries
and the rest to North and South America.
Anyone else think what I'm thinking?
Why would you assume that the amount of money sent abroad through the post (have you any link for this, by the way?) correlates with the number of foreign workers in the country by region of origin?
Failed liberal traitors:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Today's Irish Times, page 16.Unless you're thinking that you're stupid, then I doubt it.Well that is if you correlate the value of transactions through the Post Office for money sent abroad.
It appears that since 2000 the volume of these transactions has increased by 600%. Most of the growth has been fueled by foreign workers sending back money to their families.
42% was to European Countries.
23% to Asian Countries
24% to African Countries
and the rest to North and South America.
Anyone else think what I'm thinking?
Why would you assume that the amount of money sent abroad through the post (have you any link for this, by the way?) correlates with the number of foreign workers in the country by region of origin?
It doesn't which is the whole point!
Europa Conventus Delenda Est
So your thread title is a lie, then? Or are you being clever and coy to try and make a point?Today's Irish Times, page 16.
It doesn't which is the whole point!
Why not just explain what your interpretation of the figures is? What 'point' do you think you're making?
Failed liberal traitors:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Smiffy are having a Slow Day or what?So your thread title is a lie, then? Or are you being clever and coy to try and make a point?Today's Irish Times, page 16.
It doesn't which is the whole point!
Why not just explain what your interpretation of the figures is? What 'point' do you think you're making?
Yes of course it's a piss take as obviosly 24% of Foreign Workers are not from Africa!
Which makes you wonder how 24% of the money sent abroad through the Post Office goes there?
Europa Conventus Delenda Est
No, it doesn't. It would only make you think that if you believed that there should be some correlation between the number of foreign workers by region, and the countries that money is sent to through the Post Office. Why do you think this should be the case?Smiffy are having a Slow Day or what?
Yes of course it's a piss take as obviosly 24% of Foreign Workers are not from Africa!
Which makes you wonder how 24% of the money sent abroad through the Post Office goes there?
Also, there's a part of that article you obviously missed. Perhaps you should go back and read it again.
Failed liberal traitors:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To be fair now, maybe the smiff is right. Perhaps there is another explanation for the volume of cash winging its way to Africa, there is a possibility - if I may be so bold as to suggest - whites sending thier remittances for 'goods' delivered.Which makes you wonder how 24% of the money sent abroad through the Post Office goes there?
Did I not read an article in the Trib some time ago about the Drug Squad mentioning sub-Saharan dealers and mules.......maybe I was mistaken...perhaps its my monoracist (as opposed to multiracist) suspicious mind.
Maybe So...there again maybe not so maybe.To be fair now, maybe the smiff is right. Perhaps there is another explanation for the volume of cash winging its way to Africa, there is a possibility - if I may be so bold as to suggest - whites sending thier remittances for 'goods' delivered.Which makes you wonder how 24% of the money sent abroad through the Post Office goes there?
Did I not read an article in the Trib some time ago about the Drug Squad mentioning sub-Saharan dealers and mules.......maybe I was mistaken...perhaps its my monoracist (as opposed to multiracist) suspicious mind.
Europa Conventus Delenda Est
Going to bother answering the question on this thread, or are you just going to stick to your usual strategy of ignoring it?Maybe So...there again maybe not so maybe.
Failed liberal traitors:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote