Register to Comment
Page 1 of 36 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 355
Like Tree151Likes
  1. #1
    Golden Phoenix Golden Phoenix is offline

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    792

    Eoghan Murphy watch - track his housing policies and delivery of ACTUAL HOMES

    Given that the housing crisis is the single biggest issue currently facing the country let's keep a detailed record and analysis of Eoghan Murphy's performance and DELIVERY OF ACTUAL HOMES.
    Last edited by Golden Phoenix; 15th June 2017 at 09:59 AM.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  2. #2
    Levellers Levellers is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    13,474

    Good luck with that.

    The only positive I have ever seen with Murphy is that his grandfather robbed Gay Byrne!
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  3. #3
    PBP voter PBP voter is offline
    PBP voter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    6,839

    We don't need new houses. We just need to use the 180,000 empty homes-20,000 in Dublin.



    We don't wan't tradesmen get big pay and laughing at us all like the last time.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  4. #4
    ted08 ted08 is offline
    ted08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    10,859

    What housing crisis? Values are going up nicely and must not be interrupted.

    Sent from my SM-A320FL using Tapatalk
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  5. #5
    Golden Phoenix Golden Phoenix is offline

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    792

    Varadkar has tasked Murphy with a review of housing policy - to be completed within 3 months.

    Which speaks volumes about Coveney's housing policies.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  6. #6
    Disillusioned democrat Disillusioned democrat is online now
    Disillusioned democrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,744

    Good thread - Eoghan's pedigree screams "establishment", so not 100% sure he understands the purpose of the Ministry for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government.

    He, like Coveney before him, may well believe that his responsibility is to plan to make the community enrich his peer group by getting local government to pay for housing for everyone thru RA, HAP and giving developers free land.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  7. #7
    Disillusioned democrat Disillusioned democrat is online now
    Disillusioned democrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,744

    Quote Originally Posted by Golden Phoenix View Post
    Varadkar has tasked Murphy with a review of housing policy - to be completed within 3 months.

    Which speaks volumes about Coveney's housing policies.
    Or Varadkar's real agenda...this will be very telling. Varadkar probably doesn't subscribe to the notion that "nice neighbourhoods" should house povs.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  8. #8
    mr_anderson mr_anderson is online now
    mr_anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    11,313

    1)We shouldn't be looking for the government to ''deliver homes''.
    We should be focused on why the cost of building is so high in the private sector.

    If we get the cost down, people can buy without having a noose around their necks for 25-30 years.

    How much do government taxes & levies increase the cost of a home ?


    2) Build high-rise i.e. Planning.
    We should be able to build up to 30 stories in the city.
    Workers want to live within walking or cycling distance of their daily job.
    You can't attract thousands of jobs into the city & then turn around and prevent workers from living there (by restricting supply).
    Not only does it make their lives unnecessarily stressful, but it increases the pressure on rush-hour traffic.


    3) No unemployed person should be given a place to live in the city centre.
    Not only is it extremely expensive, but it forces a worker to live in the suburbs & commute daily.
    Morally, it's just wrong.


    The key with all of this is supply.
    Increase supply in aggregate.
    Increase supply particularly where it's needed (city centres).
    Get rents down (by increasing supply) so tenants have enough money left to spend in the wider economy, thereby boosting more than one sector.

    As it stands, current government policy is purposely pushing prices up.
    Last edited by mr_anderson; 15th June 2017 at 10:16 AM.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  9. #9
    Disillusioned democrat Disillusioned democrat is online now
    Disillusioned democrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,744

    Quote Originally Posted by mr_anderson View Post
    1)We shouldn't be looking for the government to ''deliver homes''.
    We should be focused on why the cost of building is so high in the private sector.

    If we get the cost down, people can buy without having a noose around their necks for 25-30 years.


    2) Build high-rise i.e. Planning.
    We should be able to build up to 30 stories in the city.
    Workers want to live within walking or cycling distance of their daily job.
    You can't attract thousands of jobs into the city & then turn around and prevent workers from living there (by restricting supply).
    Not only does it make their lives unnecessarily stressful, but it increases the pressure on rush-hour traffic.


    3) No unemployed person should be given a place to live in the city centre.
    Not only is it extremely expensive, but it forces a worker to live in the suburbs & commute daily.
    Morally, it's just wrong.


    The key with all of this is supply.
    Increase supply in aggregate.
    Increase supply particularly where it's needed (city centres).
    Get rents down (by increasing supply) so tenants have enough money left to spend in the wider economy, thereby boosting more than one sector.

    As it stands, current government policy is purposely pushing prices up.
    I'm tending to disagree now - I think the state SHOULD build 10 - 20k affordable homes across the country and start to manage homelessness at a national level, taking the local noise out of it and taking the pressure off the private market.

    No home, no job - no problem, a temporary state home in one of the centres awaits anyone who obeys a few simple rules. Can't even do that - you're on your own buddy.

    There's way too much emotion in "housing" now, too much at stake for chancers like the lady with 5 kids in the car or Erika Flemming.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  10. #10
    Lúidín Lúidín is offline
    Lúidín's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    7,258

    PBP Voter: We don't wan't tradesmen get big pay...
    We socialists do; you Fine Gaelers might not.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

Page 1 of 36 12311 ... LastLast
Sign in to CommentRegister to Comment