Terrorist spectacular attacks (Beslan for example) serve the interests of western intelligence agencies.

Originally Posted by off with their heads

like 911...

I stopped reading at that point.

As an earlier poster mentioned, with regards to the photos, the US certainly learned from previous experience. He's dead. If he isn't, why wait 10 years before lying? And about the SEAL operator in question...I'm sure he can find employment in the private security industry if he tries.

I see all the Jim Corrs have come out to play and as for Hitch22, thank fup there only seems to be one of him.

Originally Posted by parentheses

Terrorist spectacular attacks (Beslan for example) serve the interests of western intelligence agencies.

Russia Today wheeling out yet another 'analyst' to say what RT wants to hear.

Bap! Bap! US Seal tells of killing Bin Laden - Independent.ie

He gave the interview only after leaving the service after 16 years, without a pension or healthcare.

Why did he leave the service?

Why is he not receiving Veterans' Administration benefits?

Surely, a person who has been in the armed forces for that length of time would be entitled to a small pension.

Also from the above Indo article:

After the raid, the Seal said he was offered a place in a witness protection programme – delivering beer in Milwaukee. He decided against the offer because "like Mafia snitches" he would lose contact with all his friends and family.

He was dead right to refuse the offer. He killed a mass-murderer. Bin Laden didn't wear a uniform and he wasn't the leader of a country. Therefore, the Geneva Convention didn't apply to him.

I hope that his experience will help him find decent work.

If you have a problem, if no-one else can help, and if you can find him....

Originally Posted by amsterdemmetje

I see all the Jim Corrs have come out to play and as for Hitch22, thank fup there only seems to be one of him.

Thank fup that there are some people here who actually question official narrative esp when its full of holes and contradictions and no photograph lol

Originally Posted by Mercurial

I stopped reading at that point.

Read some more

Gulf of Tonkin incident

It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night

30-year Anniversary: Tonkin Gulf Lie Launched Vietnam War

President Johnson ordered U.S. bombers to "retaliate" for a North Vietnamese torpedo attack that never happened.

A pattern took hold: continuous government lies passed on by pliant mass media...leading to over 50,000 American deaths and millions of Vietnamese casualties.

Nearly three decades later, during the Gulf War, columnist Sydney Schanberg warned journalists not to forget "our unquestioning chorus of agreeability when Lyndon Johnson bamboozled us with his fabrication of the Gulf of Tonkin incident."

we will never know the truth about OBL

same as JFK