Moving highly-centralised government departments from one location to another is NOT "decentralisation" - it is relocation.
Decentralisation is taking government services from the centre and giving/forcing them onto local government to do.
After that it is then (almost exclusively) between the local government and the citizens of the locality as to what services are delivered and where and how they are funded (with most funding, bar a "top-up" coming from the locality). Under such a system, if local government in an area fails to deliver, then it is a local matter - it is not a matter for central government to get involved with (except in extremis comparable to the Troika being here).
Given the state of our finances & wider economy, the "usefulness" of our central government has to be really called into question. That doesn't mean though we should propose abolishing it rather it - like local government - has to be made "fit for purpose" and one of the more important things to do that is for central government to stop doing tasks that could be performed by local government and indeed almost invariably are in better run countries.



64Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote