Muslim Asylum Seeker asks High Court to let in second wife

[Fraxinus_]

I am not overdoing it.

Female & Male circumcision is an attack of the very worst sort on the reproductive organs.

It is an attack usually on young vulnerable children and defenceless babies

It is based on a deep seated hatred of the pleasure rightly attached to the procreative act.

If the majority of male Americans are circumcised that means nothing.

[SIZE="3"]The act of circumcision is intrinsically evil and only tolerated by backward societies in thrall to a warped Judeo Islamic ethos.[/SIZE]


bvc

Ironic that we grant asylum to women who fear female circumcision in their home countries but it's ok to do it to baby boys here.

[muzzylogik]

As he has children by both partners his polygamous marriage may even be illegal under Shari'ah law,

BBC News | UK | Polygamy law set for challenge

That's ridiculous, there's no such stipulation in Islam and it's clearly an attempt by liberals to reinvent an Islam that is palatable to them.

[imokyrok]

That's ridiculous, there's no such stipulation in Islam and it's clearly an attempt by liberals to reinvent an Islam that is palatable to them.

So is this quote from the article false?

Although Islam allows a man to marry up to four wives, he can only do so if his first wife is infertile, or if he marries women who are considered social outcasts. It is not, as many believe, meant to be for the sexual gratification of men.

And what is wrong with reinventing Islam? All religions change over the years even when every possible barrier is placed in front of them. Also the interpretation of Islam varies so much from say Saudi to Turkey that no one can claim to have a monopoly on it's interpretation.

[muzzylogik]

So is this quote from the article false?



And what is wrong with reinventing Islam? All religions change over the years even when every possible barrier is placed in front of them. Also the interpretation of Islam varies so much from say Saudi to Turkey that no one can claim to have a monopoly on it's interpretation.

It is a deliberate misrepresentation and no one has the right to reinvent Islam. It is perfect as it stands and doesn't need the distortions that men brought to Judaism and Christianity.

[John Kalahan]

Its probably cheaper to support one partner with their two spouses living together, than a couple living together as well as a former spouse living apart.

We need a quota system for asylum seekers of the order of 50 applicants per year.

If they have 4 partners so be it whether that is a family of 5 lesbians or indeed one Muslim woman with her four husbands

[imokyrok]

It is a deliberate misrepresentation and no one has the right to reinvent Islam. It is perfect as it stands and doesn't need the distortions that men brought to Judaism and Christianity.

So explain the different interpretations in different Islamic countries.

[muzzylogik]

So explain the different interpretations in different Islamic countries.

It isn't an issue of interpretation, it's the degree of application.

[Cato]

It is a deliberate misrepresentation and no one has the right to reinvent Islam. It is perfect as it stands and doesn't need the distortions that men brought to Judaism and Christianity.

Or as perfect as a caravan raiding pedophile could make it. Ahh, the blessed 'prophet' (MHBIH).

[muzzylogik]

We're not discussing your family history Cato, less of the public self-flagellation please.

[Cato]

We're not discussing your family history Cato, less of the public self-flagellation please.

I'm not the one who lives by the word of a man who consummated his 'marriage' to a 9 year old.

I thought the Christians were bad but you can take your warped morality elsewhere.