I find it interesting to say the least that survey after survey, as well as my own experience, has shown me that most Irish people have a benevolent attitude to the Irish language-yet the benevolence doesn't translate into the number of Irish speakers in the country!
J.J Lee in his book "Ireland 1912-1985 Politics and Society" is correct (see below).
However, Irish is still a living, spoken language. In my opinion, and it is the view of most Irish speakers I believe also, the only way you can become fluent in Irish is by spending a few weeks in the Gaeltacht.
Most Irish people in my experience, and as David McWilliams said in a speech last weekend, want to be able to speak Irish.
You do get the exceptions, who are few and far between, but for most people spending time in the Gaeltacht is the way.
It would probably take, from international experiences, 2 years in the Gaeltacht to become fluent in it but anyone that spends a few weeks there will probably experience an interest that will make them want to continue speaking and learning Irish.
The two exceptions are:
1) People that go the the summer camps in the Gaeltacht with their mates from home and who stick together, not meeting many of the locals
2) People that go to areas that are not in fact strong Gaeltacht areas
These are my opionions. Does anyone else disagree with this method of becoming a fluent speaker?
"Ireland 1912-1985 Politics and Society"-J.J Lee
“The failure, however, did not lie in the schools. It was the blatant failure of the state itself to devise arrangements for the subsequent use of the language that largely discredited compulsory Irish. The children were given no incentive to master Irish as a living language, only as a dead one. The charade of Irish language tests for public employment, when everybody knew the language would hardly be used again, the whole fetid system of favouritism associated with language knowledge, as distinct from language use, inevitably left its mark, stamping the most idealistic and most important task undertaken by the new state as yet one more sleazy political racket. Genuine language lovers who ‘loathed the way that politicans, the pedagogues, the urbanised peasants had sucked the life and beauty from it’ were brushed aside. The characteristic combination of hypocrisy and incompetence precluded any possibility of increasing the number of Irish speakers, as distinct from increasing the nominal command of the language among a broadly benovolent but apathetic and sceptical public. As a French observer has commented, the state ‘fulfils the letter of the project, the better to betray the spirit…it prefers to use Irish as a sort of symbol of nationality, more of less relegated to a ritualistic and ceremonial role."



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote