Originally Posted by Mercurial

In that case I simply disagree. As I said above, I think being able to secure basic protections for one's people is the fundamental test of whether or not a state is functioning properly.
.

Well, fair enough.

Originally Posted by Mercurial

There is a caveat to what I said above which I ought to have included- individual failings are not sufficient to undermine a state's legitimacy. The failure must be systematic. .

Outbreaks of ethnic violence are just par for the course in many parts of africa. It isn't a systemic failure.

Originally Posted by Mercurial

So, for example, if it were the case that most people were afraid to leave their houses for fear of being assaulted because the state was unable or unwilling to protect them before and after the fact, then I think there would be a good case to be made that the state in question is not functioning properly. The primary purpose of a state is to protect its people. When it is unable to do so, it loses its legitimacy since it is unable to meet the terms of the social contract.

Yes, I agree, it could be said to be not functioning properly. But again, those are not sufficient grounds for asylum. The asylum system is a shoddy and almost completely broken system. Having said that, I thank the gods that it doesn't work the way you think it should, because Europe, as we know it, would cease to exist within 20 years.

I wonder would anyone care to comment on why the Koreans, Japanese, Chinese do not put up with any of this nonsense. Personally, I believe the answer lies in ideological western commitment to universalism. East asians, it would seem, labour under no such illusions. That is why Japan, in 100 years will look, feel and be Japanese (albeit less densly populated) whereas Europe will be unrecognisable. Whether that turns out to be a good thing or not, we may yet live to see. If the source countries of Europe's teeming millions of "new europeans" are anythign to go by, the future doesn't look too bright to me.

Originally Posted by Kevin Parlon

Outbreaks of ethnic violence are just par for the course in many parts of africa. It isn't a systemic failure.

I'm not sure the second statement follows from the first. It could be that systematic failure is par for the course in many parts of Africa.

Originally Posted by Kevin Parlon

Having said that, I thank the gods that it doesn't work the way you think it should, because Europe, as we know it, would cease to exist.

How do you think it ought to work?

Nigerian doctors and accountants you say? Are they in Nigeria improving their country for subsequent generations?

Why do Africans insist on moving to White countries and living with us as a minority when we are a minority worldwide?
Africa has over 50 countries
Africa is rich in untouched natural resources
In the right hands Africa is the greatest piece of farmland on the planet
What more can we do for them now a mulatto is president of the USA?

Meanwhile back on planet earth....

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

^ KeyboardAndersBehringBrevik (above)

Originally Posted by meawhiterabbit

Nigerian doctors and accountants you say? Are you in Nigeria improving their country for subsequent generations?

Why do Africans insist on moving to White countries and living with us as a minority when we are a minority worldwide?
Africa has over 50 countries
Africa is rich in natural untouched natural resources
In the right hands Africa is the greatest piece of farmland on the planet
What more can we do for them now a mulatto is president of the USA?

Meanwhile back on planet earth....

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Had you ever thought about going to a Black Country and doing your bit to make it whiter by passing on your genes, or do you expect others to do that for you?

Some of the Black girls have the most fantastic pelvic floor muscles. Absolutely exquisite, and the most sensous dextrous lips

Originally Posted by Thekinghasnoclothes

Had you ever thought about going to a Black Country and doing your bit to make it whiter by passing on your genes, or do you expect others to do that for you?

Some of the Black girls have the most fantastic pelvic floor muscles. Absolutely exquisite, and the most sensous dextrous lips

No i think African countries are great just as they are and should remain African. I wouldn't want to make it whiter any more than i would like to make Japan more Arab. I am all for diversity-Its fantastic. I believe all the races have a right to have a home where they are the majority and will continue to be a majority. Anti-whites on the other hand do not share my point of view. Let me explain.

We have all heard politicians talk about diversity, tolerance, understanding, multiculturalism, immigration, integration, assimilation, the melting pot and so on but its only ever in regards to ONLY white countries and ALL white countries

Anti-racist are in reality simply anti-white. Their goal and their mentality can best be described by the Harvard professor Noel Ignatiev in his article: “Abolish the White Race.”

“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.”

Or in this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkXfnyXp06Y


This goal of abolishing the white race can be divided up into four basic stages:

1. The demonization of whites. Another term for this is what is often referred to as “White Guilt.”
2. Third world immigration into all white countries and only into white countries.
3. Forced integration as the first step towards assimilation. Assimilation is not directly forced but everybody who opposes it is condemned for being racist.
4. Anyone who speaks out against any part of the process of White genocide will be denounced as a ‘Racist’, ‘White Supremacist’ or a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

This is only happening in all white countries and ONLY white countries. It is genocide of our race, the white race.

Originally Posted by SeamusNapoleon

^ KeyboardAndersBehringBrevik (above)

Please don't belittle the deaths of all those poor people with an uncouth remark. .

PS-He was simply anti-Muslim immigration and Pro Israel. I am against white genocide. Very different. Thanks

Originally Posted by meawhiterabbit

Please don't belittle the deaths of all those poor people with an uncouth remark. .

PS-He was simply anti-Muslim immigration and Pro Israel. I am against white genocide. Very different. Thanks

No, you are just another nut with some abnormally large chip on your shoulder, but one who hides behind a keyboard [thankfully] instead of actualising some nutso solution to all these foreigner-imposed problems.

You're on your fourth post. Maybe you're new to the site, or maybe you have returned under a new username.
I don't really care, point is the people who don't espouse racial hatred behind a cloak of ethnic-protectionism have read all your little points time and time again under different guises.

It's all the same; it's all sick and pathetic nutso talk spewed by some wee coward behind a keyboard who probably masturbates to select scenes in the Turner Diaries.

Originally Posted by meawhiterabbit

Nigerian doctors and accountants you say? Are they in Nigeria improving their country for subsequent generations?

Why do Africans insist on moving to White countries and living with us as a minority when we are a minority worldwide?
Africa has over 50 countries
Africa is rich in untouched natural resources
In the right hands Africa is the greatest piece of farmland on the planet
What more can we do for them now a mulatto is president of the USA?

mulatto, I never knew that word was still in use. How quaint.

You have made a few good points but I have a feeling that you have more to say but are afraid to.

Originally Posted by SeamusNapoleon

No, you are just another nut with some abnormally large chip on your shoulder, but one who hides behind a keyboard [thankfully] instead of actualising some nutso solution to all these foreigner-imposed problems.

You're on your fourth post. Maybe you're new to the site, or maybe you have returned under a new username.
I don't really care, point is the people who don't espouse racial hatred behind a cloak of ethnic-protectionism have read all your little points time and time again under different guises.

It's all the same; it's all sick and pathetic nutso talk spewed by some wee coward behind a keyboard who probably masturbates to select scenes in the Turner Diaries.

Typical response of an anti-white. All insults but no debate at all.

Why are you such self hating.

The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations. Make no mistake – this is not mere coincidence. It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application. The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock. All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national history. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration. The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.

Would you be pro an immigration policy for African countries and ONLY African countries that saw them flooded with Non Africans? Lets imagine these Africans had such a small birthrate, they were been out bred 4:1 by the non Africans. Would you agree with this? Would you not think something was untoward?