Only in UK it takes less (5.5 years), because their civil service is working faster, but disscussion about efficiency of public services is for different topic. Other EU countries require 8 years of residence
It had been increased only two years ago. Rip-off Ireland
But it reduced backlog by 6 months at least. Don't forget that number of immigrants increased by 10 times during last 10 years and goverment had to invest a lot to be able to deal with such big number of applicants
Citizenship Applications: 7 Apr 2009: Written answers (KildareStreet.com)1999 739
2000 1004
2001 1431
2002 3574
2003 3580
2004 4074
2005 4527
2006 6813
2007 7616
2008 10885
Do you mean that Ireland should allow to buy citizenship? Otherwise anybody can buy English courses for 5 years, become citizen and then stay on welfare benefits for rest of his life
Last time selling of Irish passport finished badly
It was not always like that, it was introduced only in 2008
Is it slave ships bringing immigrants here? Immigrants knew where they were going. In UK spouses can work, but it always was more difficult to get work permit for UK.
Another immigration thread.
I'm strongly in favour of immigration, it brings many, many benefits to our insular nation.
What I have a problem with is the management of immigration, the fact that it disproportionately affects living standards of the disadvantaged in society and has been used as a tool to drive down wages and conditions here through lack of enforcement of labour laws.
An anecdotal example : It was proposed approx 10 years ago that an empty building beside Nutley Lane (a stone's throw from Montrose) be put to use to house asylum seekers. Before the suggestion ever got off the ground resident's associations had whip-arounds (large sums involved) and high powered legal representation was engaged. The proposal quickly died.
Other less affluent areas without access to the same political and legal firepower were unable to prevent asylum seeker centres (with the attendant natural social problems) being located in their localities.
It's very easy to be pro-immigration when you're unlikely to be affected by it.
Yeah but you know as well as we do she won't go home at the end of those 2 weeks.
Chain migration is an internationally recognised part of Mass immigration and results in too many 'con jobs' being fostered on us IMO.
Link:
http://www.answers.com/topic/chain-migration
Europa Conventus Delenda Est
On UK Border Agency Visa Services Home Page one can find
'All UK visa applicants , save for those benefitting from a limited number of exemptions and exceptions , are required to provide biometric data (10-digit fingerscans and a digital photograph [taken by british personnel]) as part of the application process.
You will need to go to your nearest visa application centre in person to provide your biometrics. In those countries where there is no visa application centre, you will need to go to the British mission.
Your visa application will not be processed until you have provided the neccessary biometric information.'
[Also, supporting documents that should be included with the visa application are]
'* bank statements, payslips, or some other evidence to show that you can pay for your trip and that you have enough money to support yourself and your dependents without working or getting any help from public funds, and evidence that you intend to leave the UK at the end of your visit (for example, a leter from your employer)'
Comment: The onus is very much on the visa applicant to prove he is not a liability to Britain. To preserve the mutual trust implicit in the Common Travel Area, and to avoid getting all the punters, who want to avoid/fail these visa requirements, Ireland will have to modernise and follow suit.