What "argument" did you make?
You whined a lot about how atheists don't have a unified moral code of teachings and that this is somehow "unfair". You show a complete lack of understanding of what atheism actually is. You believe that the ritualised cannibalistic consumption of the flesh of a 2000 year old Jewish zombie will bring you a form of immortality, and that this gives you the right to enforce your views on the rest of the country. You think an invisible man in the sky is constantly watching you and keeping tabs on your behaviour, especially in your bedroom, and that the country needs laws to stop anyone anywhere from doing anything that the invisible sky man might not approve of. You know exactly what the invisible sky man approves and disapproves of, cos a bunch of camel herders in the desert on magic mushrooms many thousands of years ago wrote it all down.
By any objective view, yer a nutter, plain and simple.
You should really take a leaf from the other atheists on this thread who are able to argue without this juvenile trolling.
I can only assume you haven't been reading this thread. I made my argument plain in the original post and summarised it in post #9.
And where did I say that "that this gives [me] the right to enforce [my] views on the rest of the country"?
The ballsy guys -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7iW4oWm2SA"]YouTube- Down With Atheism[/ame]
Only one thing matters: live a good, happy life. Do your heart's bidding, even when it leads you on paths that timid souls would avoid. Even when life is a torment, don't let it harden you.
Well, no, but it tends to be religions that mandate a particular moral stance on an issue from their adherents. Atheists are entirely free to take whatever personal moral stance on an issue they choose, and those stances usually cover the whole available spectrum. On abortion, for example, I know atheists that are as just as opposed to it as any gun-toting fundie, and I also know atheists who don't regard it as any more morally significant than taking a dump. The relevant point here is that none of those positions are mandated by "atheist central", and none claim to be authoritative - they're just people's personal stances.
There is no "atheism", there are only atheists.
Never let the best be the enemy of the good.
If you want to be a national school teacher, you have to teach the children a lot of religious stuff that I'd have a problem with and I'm sure atheists would too. Re Catholic v Christian, I've seen stuff happening in schools like ashes being put on the foreheads of non-RC kids on Ash Wednesday.
That's one area I can think of.