Register to Comment
Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 71
Like Tree17Likes
  1. #11
    Nebuchadnezzar Nebuchadnezzar is offline
    Nebuchadnezzar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    10,191

    Quote Originally Posted by McTell View Post
    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/...aper-1.3303986


    There's a lot of guff being generated behind the scenes that seems designed to slow the deal. Of great importance to us, given being on an island, aircraft leasing biz, Ryanair,

    First, EU to EU flights must be made by a carrier that is 50% owned by EU persons - who knew this?

    "Ownership restrictions would also apply, forcing groups such as Ryanair andInternational Airlines Group to buy out British shareholders to ensure they were 50 per cent owned and controlled by EU nationals, in order to continue operating routes within the EU." ...

    If strictly applied in a no-deal Brexit scenario, such an approach would lead to the grounding of many UK flights — something British ministers have dismissed as scaremongering. The paper notes there are no World Trade Organisation fallback options for aviation and makes clear that “old bilateral agreements between member states and the UK are not revived”.



    No, but there's IATA - IATA - Home

    IATA - Air Traffic Management

    Everyone else thinks that the "single european sky" is still at the blueprint stage -

    http://www.iata.org/pressroom/pr/Doc...ropean-sky.pdf


    Plus US, arab, chinese and russian planes come and go without anyone denying them the right to land. The tenor of this "leaked" doc is that the EU are (on our behalf) looking for difficulties that don't really exist, unless we want them to. Do we want difficulties? Where's the margin in that?

    When we're flying from Milano to Dublino, and the plane will most likely clip UK airspace, do we want to pay extra for the privilege?
    Single European Sky is not at the blueprint stage. It's a long gradual process of integration of air traffic management within the European area. Euocontrol was established in 1960 and it's purpose, contrary to the general BREXIT narrative about European bureaucracy, is to reduce the inefficiencies caused by having 30+ individual national authorities and ATC organisations managing European airspace. For example the USA with 1 national ATC organisation and regulator manages the same approx area of airspace with more traffic and nearly half the employees. Basically it's about reducing duplication. Mastrict Upper Area Control Centre is an example of the progress that has been made, combining the sovereign airspace of Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and NW Germany within a single organisation.

    The question of freedoms to operate passenger services between European states and beyond is separate matter.
    Last edited by Nebuchadnezzar; 29th November 2017 at 10:20 PM. Reason: Meant to say European bureaucracy, not European integration.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  2. #12
    Nebuchadnezzar Nebuchadnezzar is offline
    Nebuchadnezzar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    10,191

    Quote Originally Posted by pumpkinpie View Post
    There's a lot of scaremongering going on on a variety of Brexit issues, all designed to slow down or destroy the process. It's as though people have forgotten that there's big wide world outside of Europe who we do business with. It's a ridiculous situation that puts Britain in a very weak negotiating position while it's opposition party tries to score points and delay it at every opportunity. I'm not a Tory fan but the thought of Corbyn, Abbot and McDonnell in power horrifies me.
    It's not scaremongering on this issue. It going to take a lot of time and effort by civil service staff and regulators of all the nations involved , EU and non EU, to put in place new agreements to replace what we have. Again, a prime example of the Brexiteers failure to think this stuff through and the idiocy of setting a hard deadline for BREXIT.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  3. #13
    Nebuchadnezzar Nebuchadnezzar is offline
    Nebuchadnezzar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    10,191

    Yes, something will probably be sorted out, but really 'probably' is not really good enough in view of the potential mass disruption and cost if it is not resolved.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  4. #14
    Nebuchadnezzar Nebuchadnezzar is offline
    Nebuchadnezzar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    10,191

    UK will remain a member of EASA(the EU aviation regulator) and subject indirectly to ECJ rulings on aviation matters. This doesn’t resolve the issue of Freedoms on the Air such as landing rights etc but it helps.

    https://news.sky.com/story/govt-to-s...-line-11151049
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  5. #15
    Nebuchadnezzar Nebuchadnezzar is offline
    Nebuchadnezzar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    10,191

    Statement from the Commission a few days ago on the status of UK airlines if no agreement can be reached. With the present shareholdings this may affect Ryanair, EasyJet, Aer Lingus(IAG), British Airways(IAG).

    Air carriers of the United Kingdom will no longer enjoy traffic rights under any air transport agreement to which the Union is a party, be it to or from the territory of the United Kingdom, be it to or from the territory of any of the EU Member States.
    https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites...-transport.pdf
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  6. #16
    Mickeymac Mickeymac is offline
    Mickeymac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    35,044

    Quote Originally Posted by Nebuchadnezzar View Post
    Statement from the Commission a few days ago on the status of UK airlines if no agreement can be reached. With the present shareholdings this may affect Ryanair, EasyJet, Aer Lingus(IAG), British Airways(IAG).



    https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites...-transport.pdf


    Householders in Britain will never get a letter about that, but unionists who are supporting May to stay in government will get a letter plus one billion and a statement(in secret) to keep that beach in power.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  7. #17
    Nebuchadnezzar Nebuchadnezzar is offline
    Nebuchadnezzar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    10,191

    The Financial Times had an article a few days ago concerning UK USA negotiations over what will replace the current the ‘Open Skies’ EU USA arangements post BREXIT. The emerging deal is reported to be significantly worse for the British with restrictions on airlines who don’t have 50.1% shareholding for either the USA or UK(not a problem for most US carriers but a major issue for IAG/BA and perhaps Aer Lingus).

    Willie Walsh seems to have gone into full Trump/brexiteer mode, slamming the FT for fake news and saying that he will solve the shareholding problem by magic.

    Walsh on Twitter....

    I wouldn't believe anything that's written in the FT. The F in the FT stands for "Fake" Times".
    On the ownership headache, when pressed on how IAG was planning to convince regulators British Airways was both UK and EU controlled after Brexit, Mr Walsh retorted: “magic”.
    Lufthansa’s CEO thinks that BREXIT flight disruption “might be a good thing”.

    Flight disruption was one of the ways the airline industry could show the Brits the full consequences of the Leave vote and “that might be a good thing”.
    https://www.ft.com/content/612977f0-...0-08f715791301

    I find it hard to understand Willie Walsh’s blithe attitude. He sounds like David Davis in the immediate aftermath of the referendum saying that the negotiations would be ‘one of the easiest in human history'.
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  8. #18
    statsman statsman is online now
    statsman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    56,482

    Quote Originally Posted by Nebuchadnezzar View Post
    The Financial Times had an article a few days ago concerning UK USA negotiations over what will replace the current the ‘Open Skies’ EU USA arangements post BREXIT. The emerging deal is reported to be significantly worse for the British with restrictions on airlines who don’t have 50.1% shareholding for either the USA or UK(not a problem for most US carriers but a major issue for IAG/BA and perhaps Aer Lingus).

    Willie Walsh seems to have gone into full Trump/brexiteer mode, slamming the FT for fake news and saying that he will solve the shareholding problem by magic.

    Walsh on Twitter....





    Lufthansa’s CEO thinks that BREXIT flight disruption “might be a good thing”.



    https://www.ft.com/content/612977f0-...0-08f715791301

    I find it hard to understand Willie Walsh’s blithe attitude. He sounds like David Davis in the immediate aftermath of the referendum saying that the negotiations would be ‘one of the easiest in human history'.
    Aer Lingus transatlantic flights will still be covered by the US/EU agreement, surely?
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  9. #19
    Tribal Tribal is offline

    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    2,391

    Interesting if it meant Shannon became the EU base for UK/USA flights!
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  10. #20
    HarshBuzz HarshBuzz is offline
    HarshBuzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    13,630

    For a public company like Ryanair, how can you possibly be expected to satisfy that 50% ownership rule?

    US or Chinese funds could easily own more than 50% today, less tomorrow, more the next day...
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Sign in to CommentRegister to Comment