Quote:
|
You have no fear of calling it 'your hypothesis', after all no one would be crazy enough to accuse you of plagiarising them. However, what I assume to be true, is a position held my many geneticists and even historians. It's still a hypothesis, but a more likely one than what you have just spouted.
|
It's very very simple - the people you call "Palestinians" have the same chromosomes as the Ishmaelites who travelled around. They carried the common genes to Arabia and Jordan, from which part of that invented nation came.
As for the other part - they came from other Arab countries. Yes, I spoke about their names - their Turkish, Sudanese, Egyptian, Iraqi etc. names, but it's not just that, it's genetics too - like the Sudanese in Jisr Az-Zarqaa who carry specific thrombocyte, and it's historical records, that go back to the 1850's, when roads were paved and for that purpose workers were brought from Egypt and even as far as Morocco.
I also lean on the fact that the southern Bedouins reached the Galillee area, and that tribesmen had ruled the area for many years (according to Arab sources, of course).
There's no shame in calling your hypothesis what it is - your hypothesis, it's based on assumptions of genetic researchers, and has to be proven, yet.
31st August 2009
Similar Threads 
Linear Mode
