Politics.ie
Advertise on Politics.ie

Go Back   Politics.ie > Topical Discussion > Foreign Affairs

US Supreme Court

This is a discussion on US Supreme Court within the Foreign Affairs forums, part of the Topical Discussion category on Politics.ie. Now that Rehnquist is reportedly dead, what type of Justice will Bush put forward?...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 472
Default US Supreme Court

Now that Rehnquist is reportedly dead, what type of Justice will Bush put forward?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote

Advertise on Politics.ie

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,678
Default

San Francisco Chronicle
__________________
Using P.ie again on a trial basis...

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- Nerdishness abounds!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Galway
Posts: 603
Default

More conservative then Roberts. The problem, however, is that the Dems will allow Roberts through [to make themselves look constructive and bipartisan] but will then hold up his new appointe with a filibuster.
Not that it will change the makeup of the court, as he was a conservative. However, it will 'renew' this conservative seat for another 3 decades.
Scalia for Chief Justice
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14,534
Default Re: US Supreme Court

Quote:
Originally Posted by WyldeOne
Now that Rehnquist is reportedly dead, what type of Justice will Bush put forward?
Chief Justice, or just Justice? I read a report earlier that suggests he might consider putting Roberts forward as Chief Justice, and filling the remaining vacancy with someone else. I don't know how precedented something like that would be.

I do think that he's in a pretty weakened state, politically, with falling approval ratings over Iraq, the disastrous handling of the hurricance aftermath and the possibility of serious problems arising in the next month from the investigation of the Valerie Palme leak. Because of this, I doubt if he'll try to nominate anything other than Roberts mark 2 (conservative, but nice enough not to scare the horses). Having said that, knowing my precognitive skills (not quite on a par with Danny's) he'll probably try to put Scalia forward.

At the risk of being insensitive, though, this death doesn't really matter that much in terms of the make-up of the court. Renquist was a conservative, and will be replaced by a conservative, thus the balance will remain the same. It's the Day-O'Connor retirement that's much more significant.
__________________
Failed liberal traitors:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 472
Default

I was under the impression that the Court itself chose which of them would be the Chief Justice based on legnth on the court. This would keep a "newbie" from really screwing things up.

Quote:
At the risk of being insensitive, though, this death doesn't really matter that much in terms of the make-up of the court. Renquist was a conservative, and will be replaced by a conservative, thus the balance will remain the same. It's the Day-O'Connor retirement that's much more significant.
I agree with most of this. Bush isn't going to put forward another centrist, it should be a conservative, from his pov. I think part of the mystery surrounding the function of the court from the general pov of the public is what will truly make his death a massively significant event. There are a lot of arguments here about what the role of the Supreme Court is. Some think the role is to make laws, others to enforce laws. The role of the Court is to determine the Constitutionality of a law created by the legislative branch. Since most politicians are going to create their own spin on this, I think his death will be as interesting to watch as O'Connor's retirement.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Waterford
Posts: 4,369
Default

I was sorry to hear of the death of William Rehnquist following a battle with thyroid cancer. Known in private to be a modest man in a very high-profile position, he had a very long and distinguished career serving the US Supreme Court for more than 33 years. The pro-life movement will certainly remember him for voting against the establishment of legalised abortions in 1973. I hope God remembers him now.
__________________
MJ Coughlan,
Waterford City.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14,534
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjcoughlan
I hope God remembers him now.




What? Renquist - that's today? Sh.it, I completely forgot! Quick, someone make him a cup of tea and tell him I'll be down in five minutes.
__________________
Failed liberal traitors:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjcoughlan
The pro-life movement will certainly remember him for voting against the establishment of legalised abortions in 1973.
Yes, and the civil rights movement will remember him for trying to keep blacks out of shops and restaurants in 1964.

Quote:
I hope God remembers him now.
Oh, I'm sure he will. :twisted:
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,485
Default

Dan Qualye needs a job, i think he should be in the running!
__________________
The King of Men
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smiffy


What? Renquist - that's today? Sh.it, I completely forgot! Quick, someone make him a cup of tea and tell him I'll be down in five minutes.
LEGEND
__________________
Using P.ie again on a trial basis...

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- Nerdishness abounds!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DCU in Supreme Court Monday 29/6/9; end of tenure? pangur1 Education & Science 0 26th June 2009 03:29 AM
2007 and the Supreme Court jayblue Progressive Democrats 0 22nd December 2006 03:38 PM
Mc Dowell for the Supreme Court? drjimryan Justice 15 7th October 2006 08:49 PM
Can we override the Supreme Court in a referendum? Shepherd Justice 37 2nd June 2006 10:48 AM
US Supreme Court Appointee LordJagged Current Affairs 15 21st July 2005 12:18 AM


Advertise on Politics.ie

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:22 AM.