Politics.ie
Advertise on Politics.ie

Go Back   Politics.ie > Political Parties > Fine Gael

George Lee resigns from Fine Gael and as a TD

This is a discussion on George Lee resigns from Fine Gael and as a TD within the Fine Gael forums, part of the Political Parties category on Politics.ie. Originally Posted by reknaw Believe it or not, there are some places where a parliamentarian can't flounce away and resign ...

Reply
 
LinkBack (5) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1261 (permalink)  
Old 9th February 2010
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reknaw View Post
Believe it or not, there are some places where a parliamentarian can't flounce away and resign his/her seat just like that if s/he is not being listened to by the party leaders.

Here in Finland, for example, a parliamentarian must request the permission of the Eduskun-ta (LOL, the word is unhypenated, but the cuss editor asterisks it out for some reason I can't fathom) to resign from it. And present a reason for doing so, if one is not already evident in the form of a scandal, a criminal conviction, appointment to an international post or the European Parliament, poor health, and so on. Permission is usually granted, but has been refused on a number of occasions.

The last time that happened was a few years ago when a lady representing the Left Union (formerly communists and their socialist allies) felt she was not achieving anything and wanted to quit. There was a vote and permission was refused. In effect, she was told to grow up and knuckle down to the job that her voters had chosen her to do, so she completed her term.

It would be interesting to see the vote if Lee had to do the same in the Dáil, wouldn't it? How would Biffo have voted, or Varadkar or Bruton?

Another amazing difference between two EU countries is that the Speaker of the Eduskun-ta is currently unpopular with some parliamentarians because of his very strict line on expenses. We sure could do with someone like him in Ireland.
Stop depressing us with tales of funcitoning responsible democracries
Next you will start putting up pictures of beatiful scandily clad women in sorching sunshine

Quote:
Originally Posted by gombeennation View Post
He was offered front bench.
That is not what he wanted.
He was on the telly all day yesterday - I'm surprised you didnt hear him say this. He wanted input.
He was not given the oppurtunity to input.

People say he didnt stay long enough - BS - he was there for 9 months.
He made an assessment that he could be there for 9 months after that and still no change.
He decided to leave because he wasnt happy with playing the charade.
He should be applauded for that.

Easiest thing for him to have done was , sit back , collect the cash , collect the pension - take the front bench , get more cash , get bigger pension.
he refused to do that and yet gets villified?

as for "he couldnt stand the heat" - more BS.
what heat? going around chairing committee meetings?
i suggest he couldnt stand the BS.

should he have known it was going to be like this?
possibly.
but you never know, unless you go.
he might have thought it was a slow process, but when he got there it looked impossible.

the winners/losers?

short term winner - GL
short term lose - FG
short term winner - FF ( easy to take pot shots at FG ).
long term winner - FG (if they get rid of kenny on the back of this fiasco) or FF ( if FG hold onto kenny )
long term losers - anyone who wants to make a difference in politics , ie the next young gun on the block who says "im going to change the system"- will be met by "hes just another GL"
super long term winners - the old political elite - same old same old "these new boys dont realise how difficult it is in politics , you have to be born into the role - now vote for my son , he is steeped in politics"
No the BS is that he wanted things his way, he didn't offer any proposals, as he admits. He sat there and because everyone didn't workship at his feet ala RTE he threw a strop, grabbed the ball and went home.
GL isn't a winner, short or long term.
He is a quitter and will always be known as such.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sync View Post
Yet he never offered input. And he's never claimed he did. He just "wanted it". So chairing the economic committee wasn't input. Going to the OECD wasn't input.

Isn't it more a case that if the input he wanted to offer (reduce cuts, engage in stimulus) was as well thought out as what he's offered over the past 24 hours then they were right to ignore him?

His position is fundamentally opposed to both FGs and FFs. Who's fault is it that FG wouldn't revise their entire financial outlook to suit him? They heard him. They ignored him and went with Bruton's ideas. What else should he have done?

This is like if Bono joined the DUP, then left in a huff that they wouldn't listen to his 32 counties plan, a plan which he later explained to the media consisted solely of "I'd like a 32 county Ireland"
WE don't often agree but have to say well said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by N17 View Post


Should he resign because he cant influence his team either?
Sod off up or down the N17.
Reply With Quote

Advertise on Politics.ie

  #1262 (permalink)  
Old 9th February 2010
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmayo View Post
Ehh correction he was the best known economic commentator in the country.

There is a big difference.
Your description shows you just believe the hype about George Lee, which I am afraid he started to believe himself.

BTW I would be interested to know of the ones who are now, or were back 9 months ago, lauding him as some economic messiah if they were calling him a pessimistic whinger in 2007 ?

I used to argue those people were wrong that he was whinging, now I am not so sure if they were right.

And yes I do acknowledge that he read the economy right, but so did lots of us.

I Agree with most of what you, but very few economists were calling it bad for as long as he was ,however, my main beef about the whole episode,why did he enter politics, I Have a fair idea how politics work and i am looking at it from the outside,He is an intelligent man, and he has been close to it for 20 years,The system cannot be changed because those that can change it do not want to change it, He lacked foresight in that regard,To those that say he did not give it time, thats nonsense, he was right to go he would be just misrepresenting those people who elected him,Kenny and those that brought him into the party handled him badly, they had a very high octane person to deal with all he wanted was to have an input into policy, and they left him in the slow lane,Several journalists have written that he was unhappy,Kenny was the manager, does he not read the papers,Kenny has one good thing going for him and that is, there is no one better to take over, O Reilly is the best hope for the future,Kenny did two excellant intrviews today and the party must get behind him,there is hope as he says, he wants to show more of himself,certainly, the Kenny that has been doing interviews recently is a disaster,
Reply With Quote
  #1263 (permalink)  
Old 9th February 2010
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Iarmhi
Posts: 2,528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmayo View Post
Ehh correction he was the best known economic commentator in the country.

There is a big difference.
Your description shows you just believe the hype about George Lee, which I am afraid he started to believe himself.

BTW I would be interested to know of the ones who are now, or were back 9 months ago, lauding him as some economic messiah if they were calling him a pessimistic whinger in 2007 ?

I used to argue those people were wrong that he was whinging, now I am not so sure if they were right.

And yes I do acknowledge that he read the economy right, but so did lots of us.
Whether he was the best economist ever to grace this planet or not - what he really was - He was the people's champion. He was paraded in as someone who was going to solve this country. I don't think the people every thought he would change anything over night, but they felt he was batting for them in the trenches. He was also a media Darling which FF would have found hard to touch until he was in government.

He was worth at least 3-4% for FG imo, and to lose him is a big loss for the party. If he needed to be treated with kid gloves, so be it.

Its disappointing that he is now gone & FG have done well in the PR battle since, but people, no matter how they see him, will see it as a loss for them and will react accordingly. On a positive for FG, it looks like it has galvonised the party. But I am now in the camp that Kenny will forever be associated with own goals, and anytime something negative appears for FG, he will be further hit. I wish him well, thank him for all he has done, but I see no way he can substain any credible position with the public.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

It will be interesting to see how RTE make 30 mins out of the year 2009 for "Reeling in the Years"
Reply With Quote
  #1264 (permalink)  
Old 9th February 2010
Chrisco's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North, South, East, and West.
Posts: 2,190
Default

Sorry if this came up earlier, and I missed it.

George Hook was giving GLee a hard time yesterday on Newstalk; I just happened to be watching the re-run of the LLS (I wanted to hear Hookie's jibe at Tubbers for being a FFer), and he made an interesting comment in response to the question why didn't he agree to run in the Euros for Fine Gael:

Quote:
I thought I couldn’t be able to make a difference; I worry about your old pal, George Lee, for instance […] I mean he was a very famous guy, he was doing a great job, and then he goes into Dail Eireann and suddenly he gets lost in the morass. I couldn't get lost in the morass...
__________________
Economic Left/Right: -2.58
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.52
Reply With Quote
  #1265 (permalink)  
Old 9th February 2010
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookie View Post
It's true but he did seem to catch them off guard if you're to believe that he didn't warn them or discuss it with them that much. I didn't hear Mairead but Reilly was very good on VB last night.
McGuinness was very good on RTE. She's a head and shoulders above every other senior FG figure.
Reply With Quote
  #1266 (permalink)  
Old 9th February 2010
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,450
Default

Sure did bring some class to FG. Pity they did,nt know what it was for or how to use it.

The George Lee Class Bidet.

Reply With Quote
  #1267 (permalink)  
Old 9th February 2010
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sync View Post
Yet he never offered input. And he's never claimed he did. He just "wanted it". So chairing the economic committee wasn't input. Going to the OECD wasn't input.
he was talking about input into the economic policy.
i agree , chairing committe IS input - its just not economic policy input.
thats what he was saying on the telly all day yesterday.
some of it might be on rte.ie iplayer.
have a look.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sync View Post
Isn't it more a case that if the input he wanted to offer (reduce cuts, engage in stimulus) was as well thought out as what he's offered over the past 24 hours then they were right to ignore him?
I dont think they did listen to him - thats what he said.
he corrected VB when VB said "you werent getting as much input as you hoped" - GL's reply was "Just to correct you , i wasnt getting ANY input"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sync View Post
His position is fundamentally opposed to both FGs and FFs. Who's fault is it that FG wouldn't revise their entire financial outlook to suit him? They heard him. They ignored him and went with Bruton's ideas. What else should he have done?
same answer as above.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sync View Post
This is like if Bono joined the DUP, then left in a huff that they wouldn't listen to his 32 counties plan, a plan which he later explained to the media consisted solely of "I'd like a 32 county Ireland"
More like if the DUP asked bono to join with the lure of having an input into the geopolitical make up of the island.
then put bono out chairing meetings.

I think the problem was too much assumptions on both sides.
GL assumed that he would have an input - IMO he would have had to have been led to believe this.
EK + FG assumed he was like all the other benchwarmers , clock watchers and career politicians.

EK assumed GL would be happy doing brain dead shlt like chairing indefinitely
"why wouldnt he , all you have to do is chair - hes able to do it - he gets paid , he gets his pension , he gets his perks - what more would a man want"
problem is , the GL is not a career politician , he wants to be able to do something.
he is not content to play out time like the rest of those FG ( fine gombeens ).

I do have a laugh when people say he couldnt stand the heat!
Yeah ,its SOOO hot there , working tirelessly
GL could do that shlt in his sleep - like most people could.
its a time filler , where you prove yourself.
prove yourself to be a politician , and willing to do anything to climb that greasy pole - even if that means you do nothing for 9 months , 12 months , 4 years , 10 years.
head down boy - your time will come.
it highlights all that is wrong with irish politics.

he didnt walk away cos it was hard , he walked away cos it was too easy , not challenging and a waste of his time.
Reply With Quote
  #1268 (permalink)  
Old 9th February 2010
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North County Dublin
Posts: 5,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gombeennation View Post
He was offered front bench.
That is not what he wanted.
He was on the telly all day yesterday - I'm surprised you didnt hear him say this. He wanted input.
He was not given the oppurtunity to input.

People say he didnt stay long enough - BS - he was there for 9 months.
He made an assessment that he could be there for 9 months after that and still no change.
He decided to leave because he wasnt happy with playing the charade.
He should be applauded for that.

Easiest thing for him to have done was , sit back , collect the cash , collect the pension - take the front bench , get more cash , get bigger pension.
he refused to do that and yet gets villified?

as for "he couldnt stand the heat" - more BS.
what heat? going around chairing committee meetings?
i suggest he couldnt stand the BS.

should he have known it was going to be like this?
possibly.
but you never know, unless you go.
he might have thought it was a slow process, but when he got there it looked impossible.

the winners/losers?

short term winner - GL
short term lose - FG
short term winner - FF ( easy to take pot shots at FG ).
long term winner - FG (if they get rid of kenny on the back of this fiasco) or FF ( if FG hold onto kenny )
long term losers - anyone who wants to make a difference in politics , ie the next young gun on the block who says "im going to change the system"- will be met by "hes just another GL"
super long term winners - the old political elite - same old same old "these new boys dont realise how difficult it is in politics , you have to be born into the role - now vote for my son , he is steeped in politics"
I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm trying to figure out why when it appears that negotiation towards achieving his goals was feasible just recently, he opted not to give it extra time to see if he could make a difference. Yes FG should have made that happen from the start. They didn't and they didn't get a second chance. I'd like to have seen what that second chance would have achieved. However if, as I postulated, his career break was coming to a close I can see why he wasn't prepared to give it a second chance. Overall though it is us the people who are the losers here because it's now politics as usual and I imagine it will be a long time before any other dynamic individual from outside the political cartel will take the same chance.
__________________
"Gods are fragile things; they may be killed by a whiff of science or a dose of common sense." - Chapman Cohen.
Reply With Quote
  #1269 (permalink)  
Old 9th February 2010
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imokyrok View Post
I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm trying to figure out why when it appears that negotiation towards achieving his goals was feasible just recently, he opted not to give it extra time to see if he could make a difference. Yes FG should have made that happen from the start. They didn't and they didn't get a second chance. I'd like to have seen what that second chance would have achieved. However if, as I postulated, his career break was coming to a close I can see why he wasn't prepared to give it a second chance. Overall though it is us the people who are the losers here because it's now politics as usual and I imagine it will be a long time before any other dynamic individual from outside the political cartel will take the same chance.
I see what you are saying alright.
He did say that he wasnt interested in having a front bench.
This is probably beyond the realm of comprehension of all career politicians and those people who have been instituationalised.
He wanted to contribute - NOT get his as.s on a comfy chair , nor have a merc at his beck and call.
It must be completely beyond belief from the fine gombeens in there.
I think thats what EK would have thought " let that upstart rot in the chair and if push comes to shove i will give him the ultimate prize - a front bench - no one can resist the power of the front bench"
EK would have thought like that because he deals with gombeens day in day out and has done for 35 YEARS!!! yes 35 YEARS.
most gombeens would sit backwards on a chair in a clown suit for 10 years if it meant getting a front bench.
GL aint a gombeen tho.
that was EKs mistake.


I know what you are a saying about the second chance - and it would have been interesting but did george really want to work in a place that you only get what you want by threats?
people can say "thats irish politics" - and maybe they are right - and THATS where the real problem is.
Reply With Quote
  #1270 (permalink)  
Old 9th February 2010
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,572
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gombeennation View Post
I see what you are saying alright.
He did say that he wasnt interested in having a front bench.
This is probably beyond the realm of comprehension of all career politicians and those people who have been instituationalised.
He wanted to contribute - NOT get his as.s on a comfy chair , nor have a merc at his beck and call.
It must be completely beyond belief from the fine gombeens in there.
I think thats what EK would have thought " let that upstart rot in the chair and if push comes to shove i will give him the ultimate prize - a front bench - no one can resist the power of the front bench"
EK would have thought like that because he deals with gombeens day in day out and has done for 35 YEARS!!! yes 35 YEARS.
most gombeens would sit backwards on a chair in a clown suit for 10 years if it meant getting a front bench.
GL aint a gombeen tho.
that was EKs mistake.


I know what you are a saying about the second chance - and it would have been interesting but did george really want to work in a place that you only get what you want by threats?
people can say "thats irish politics" - and maybe they are right - and THATS where the real problem is.
Can you please tell me what kenny should have done?

Spare athe polemics about gombeens, I'm not interested in that.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.politics.ie/fine-gael/123543-george-lee-resigns-fine-gael-td.html
Posted By For Type Date
George Lee resigns from Fine Gael • thepropertypin.com This thread Refback 8th February 2010 01:21 PM
Trendai This thread Refback 8th February 2010 01:20 PM
Tom Cosgrave (tomcosgrave) on Twitter This thread Refback 8th February 2010 01:13 PM
George Lee resigns from Fine Gael This thread Refback 8th February 2010 12:53 PM
George Lee resigns from Fine Gael This thread Refback 8th February 2010 12:51 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
George Lee is the Fine Gael candidate for Dublin South MookieBaylock Fine Gael 794 8th February 2010 03:39 PM
Could Fine Gael pull a George Lee type stunt for Donegal? QuizMaster Elections 100 5th August 2009 10:42 AM
Economy is fine. George Lee was lying. Supermanpolitician Political Humour 26 13th May 2009 11:13 AM
Fine Gael and the EPP Chrisco Elections 4 7th May 2009 12:23 PM
The origins of Fine Gael/Cumann na Gael Big Bobo Fine Gael 67 26th November 2008 01:19 PM


Advertise on Politics.ie

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56 PM.