![]() |
|
| |||||||
|
Hey there! It looks like you're enjoying Politics.ie but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Joining Politics.ie is completely free. Register now! Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message. |
This is a discussion on Dublin Landmark - Gormley's Windmill within the Environment forums, part of the Topical Discussion category on Politics.ie. A few weeks ago, I was shocked to discover that some members of Dublin City Council wanted to make the ...
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| A few weeks ago, I was shocked to discover that some members of Dublin City Council wanted to make the Ringsend ESB chimneys protected structures. There's no doubt that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Personally, I have always thought they are an eyesore but I started thinking about a possible replacement as demolishing them will probably be more trouble than its worth. My suggestion is that we replace the chimneys with a large wind turbine. GE have a 3.6 MW machine with a diameter of 105m and I believe there are 5MW machines in Germany. London has its eye, Toronto has the CN tower, Paris the Eiffel tower, Sydney & San Francisco have bridges. Dublin could have its windmill & what better way to advertise Wind power than to replace the stacks from old oil burning boilers with a large turbine. There are practical questions to be answered such as whether there is enough wind in the area to power the turbine but I suspect the wind is more than adequate. Since it would be in the constituency of the leader of the Green Party, I'm sure we could name it after him. |
| |
| ||||
| Quote:
I like the chimneys, they are a land mark and have been for some time.
__________________ The politics.ie definition of To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. . |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them. - Niccolò Machiavelli |
| |||
| Quote:
The towers are an eyesore, so take them down if they are no longer in use. The Green Party has become a really bad joke. Gormless has looked after his state pension, but destroyed the party.
__________________ . Vote No to Lisbon to preserve Irish sovereignty. Vote No to collapse this government and stop NAMA. |
| |||
| Great idea wombat but I'm sure the Dubs would end up calling it something a lot more colourful than your name for it. And think of the stories that would circulate and the rumourmill that would start up about how the blades could fly off and behead people or how it might move faster if located near Dublin 4 because of the amount of hot air flowing from there. The Urban Turbine could be a 6-7 MW Enercon 126 the largest wind-bagger in the world at present - a perfectly suitable symbol for the Irish Capital I tell you. And Dublin has nothing truly high and eye-catching either like most world-cities so it could take care of that job also, launching Dubling into a new hemisphere of international tourism where people from all over the world could come to climb the structure like they do high things elsewhere and look down on the city and take another photo and pay through the nose - €20 to climb up, the windmill generating money as well as electricity. It could have a solar station below it too on the ground so that on the days that the wind isn't blowing, the solar station could turn the iconic landmark thus perpetuating the myth that everything is in Dublin. Maybe Dublin Bay could be renamed Windy Arbour? |
| |||
| They're not so bad and can be used as pointers if you are in the right location - IIRc they date from the mid 1970s so they are not that old. If they want to build a Tower that would be a tourist attraction why not put up a supra Round Tower where that dumb Spire is now and (ala Monsieur Eifel's meccano set) charge people to see the view from the top - now that rather than a windmill would be a real money spinner! Sure Gormely creates enough wind all by himself to turn a bank of windmills as it is! :P
__________________ This day in Irish History: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. COUNTRY FIRST |
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ "Unless you are an absolute pacifist, then you acknowledge that there are times when taking up arms is appropriate." - cactusflower |
| ||||
| A lot of architecturally important buildings were bulldozed in Dublin over the past 50 years, the chimneys wouldn't rate very high in comparison. On the other hand the former Battersea power station in London is now a Grade 2 listed building, although it has a lot of interesting art deco architectural features which are absent from the Ringsend chimneys. I'd still prefer them to the spike in O'Connell Street. I don't think they every got nicknames like other pieces of architecture have? (What about the towers at the power?). |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Millenium Spire to be replace by windmill | imported_Déise | Current Affairs | 15 | 1st April 2009 06:24 PM |
| Landmark ruling gives custody to adopters | TheBear | Health and Social Affairs | 8 | 17th September 2006 06:34 PM |
| Suspected IRA member on bail pending landmark challenge | Johnny | Northern Ireland | 27 | 24th November 2005 12:16 PM |
| Landmark Legal case. | KingKane | Political Humour | 2 | 11th March 2005 04:25 PM |
| |