Politics.ie
Advertise on Politics.ie

Go Back   Politics.ie > Topical Discussion > Economy

Hey there!

It looks like you're enjoying Politics.ie but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Joining Politics.ie is completely free. Register now!

Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Its time to Nationalise Ireland's land

This is a discussion on Its time to Nationalise Ireland's land within the Economy forums, part of the Topical Discussion category on Politics.ie. Originally Posted by NewRepublic Oh well at least you have more humanity than the Russians. They went down the road ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 10th April 2009
Cael's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewRepublic View Post
Oh well at least you have more humanity than the Russians. They went down the road of slaughtering the peasant farmers.

Thats not actually true. the level of sabotage became so great that drastic measures had to be taken to stop it. But there were millions of saboteurs in Russia, whereas you only have 125,000 farmers to begin with in the 26, and only 40,000 of them full time.
__________________
If voting could change anything - it would be banned.

"The transition from Capitalism to Communism is certainly bound to yield a tremendous abundance and variety of political forms, but the essence will inevitably be the same: the Dictatorship of the Proletariat." V.I. Lenin. The State and Revolution.
Reply With Quote

Advertise on Politics.ie

  #82 (permalink)  
Old 10th April 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Galway
Posts: 231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cael View Post

Give the farmers the opportunity to work the land they still own, in common with all other citizens. What's happening now is that a few people are stealing the land from its rightful owners - all the people of Ireland, as stated in the 1916 Proclamation.
Legally purchased more like, thanks to Michael Davitt and the Land League. A true man of the people.
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 10th April 2009
Cael's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewRepublic View Post
Legally purchased more like, thanks to Michael Davitt and the Land League. A true man of the people.

Michael Davitt wanted the big estates nationalized for the benefit of the whole people, but the grabbers and the Irish Party shafted him and the Irish nation.
__________________
If voting could change anything - it would be banned.

"The transition from Capitalism to Communism is certainly bound to yield a tremendous abundance and variety of political forms, but the essence will inevitably be the same: the Dictatorship of the Proletariat." V.I. Lenin. The State and Revolution.
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 10th April 2009
baldur0300's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 6,410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cael View Post
Michael Davitt wanted the big estates nationalized for the benefit of the whole people, but the grabbers and the Irish Party shafted him and the Irish nation.
He had absolutely no support for hsi proposals. Of course he was going to be shafted. The Irish people would never have tolerated collectivisation. Let alone the fact it simply does not work!
__________________
“Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” - Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 10th April 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,825
Default

[QUOTE=Factorem;1546837]

"I agree that the subsidy system is flawed. It's totally immoral too."

How do you know that it is immoral? Have you a direct line to the Almighty? Why do you Staters moralise so much?

Thou shalt not take the name of God in vain.
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 10th April 2009
Cael's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baldur0300 View Post
He had absolutely no support for hsi proposals. Of course he was going to be shafted. The Irish people would never have tolerated collectivisation. Let alone the fact it simply does not work!

What do you mean by "the Irish people?" Only a small minority of the Irish people benefitted from the break up of the estates - and a big percentage of those who did benefit were the most hated grabbers, who had grabbed the land of famine victims.
__________________
If voting could change anything - it would be banned.

"The transition from Capitalism to Communism is certainly bound to yield a tremendous abundance and variety of political forms, but the essence will inevitably be the same: the Dictatorship of the Proletariat." V.I. Lenin. The State and Revolution.
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 10th April 2009
Cael's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,986
Default

I tell you one thing, its not forgotten in many parts of the countryside who the grabber families were. A great number of the "strong farmers" who are bleeding the country dry, have that mark of Cain on them.
__________________
If voting could change anything - it would be banned.

"The transition from Capitalism to Communism is certainly bound to yield a tremendous abundance and variety of political forms, but the essence will inevitably be the same: the Dictatorship of the Proletariat." V.I. Lenin. The State and Revolution.
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 10th April 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Galway
Posts: 231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baldur0300 View Post
He had absolutely no support for hsi proposals. Of course he was going to be shafted. The Irish people would never have tolerated collectivisation. Let alone the fact it simply does not work!
That idea could not float as we were part of the UK. For the people would have meant for the British. A case of better have the poor farmers own it rather than the British.
Anyway, as you say the Irish would not tolerate it therefore it didnt happen and wont
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 10th April 2009
baldur0300's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 6,410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cael View Post
What do you mean by "the Irish people?" Only a small minority of the Irish people benefitted from the break up of the estates - and a big percentage of those who did benefit were the most hated grabbers, who had grabbed the land of famine victims.
A very large percentage of the Irish people at the time were on the land and every was related to a small farmer somewhere. Do you actually think that after getting rid of the English landlords they would have willingly given their land over to the State? Of course they wouldn't.
__________________
“Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” - Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 10th April 2009
Cael's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baldur0300 View Post
A very large percentage of the Irish people at the time were on the land and every was related to a small farmer somewhere. Do you actually think that after getting rid of the English landlords they would have willingly given their land over to the State? Of course they wouldn't.

They didnt really get rid of the English landlords - some of them are still very large landowners in Ireland. Most landlords went bankrupt after the famine and were glad to sell up. You are getting involved with the question of nationalism there, which certainly gave the grabbers an advantage, but it is a huge overstatement to say that the Irish people would not accept nationalisation of the land, as most of them would only have the kind of secondary contact with the question you describe. Davitt was very far before his time, in relation to the grabbers and to the British government, so I dont imagine anything else could have happened than did - but we today do not have to stay under the cosh of such a tiny and pampered minority.
__________________
If voting could change anything - it would be banned.

"The transition from Capitalism to Communism is certainly bound to yield a tremendous abundance and variety of political forms, but the essence will inevitably be the same: the Dictatorship of the Proletariat." V.I. Lenin. The State and Revolution.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NAMA or Nationalise COMMIE Economy 149 24th July 2009 07:15 PM
What will Labour Nationalise? Barry Labour 10 5th June 2009 11:33 AM
Re-Nationalise SR Technics JollyRedGiant Economy 45 17th May 2009 10:05 PM
nationalise the banks now say economists BodyofEvidence Economy 90 25th April 2009 05:11 PM
Is it time for a Land bridge / tunnel to the UK John Kalahan Transport 50 6th January 2008 07:15 PM


Advertise on Politics.ie

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:17 PM.