![]() |
|
| |||||||
|
Hey there! It looks like you're enjoying Politics.ie but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Joining Politics.ie is completely free. Register now! Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message. |
This is a discussion on IBEC seeks 3% cut in welfare payments within the Economy forums, part of the Topical Discussion category on Politics.ie. If they do it should be cut, a tax relief on union membership is ok, because at leats they have ...
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |
| |||
| Quote:
Does not surprise me if that is true |
| |||
| Quote:
Many small businesses are failing. Therefore their start-up plans mustn't have been good enough. Therefore we need to raise the barrier to starting a business by front-loading taxation on business. So a disincentive to start a business is what's required to improve the economy? Is that what you're advocating? Imagine mapping this logic to Darwinism. Too many species are weak. Therefore it would be better if genetic mutation was less likely. That way way we'll get fewer but stronger species. Way to produce a healthy ecosystem! |
| |||
| Precisely why welfare needs to be cut, €204 here vs ~€66 in UK, over 3 times as much |
| |||
| They are EMPLOYERS, who EMPLOY the lower classes as well as middle classes; what's your alternative comrade? Have no employers and no jobs ??!! |
| |||
| You really are a statist.Kill a business off before it can even start,by using the more powerful instrument the state has.
__________________ The trifling economy of paper, as a cheaper medium, or its convenience for transmission, weighs nothing in opposition to the advantages of the precious metals... it is liable to be abused, has been, is, and forever will be abused, in every country in which it is permitted." --Thomas Jefferson to John W. Eppes, 1813. |
| ||||
| I'm opposed to this, not for altruistic or ideological reasons, but rather because the vast majority of welfare payments are disposable income that gets put back into the economy the moment it hits the claimants' hands. On that basis, the double whammy of increased hardship on the poor and the hit on the wider economy make it a no for me. Over the medium-long term though, welfare reform is desperately needed. But a time of crisis is not a time to make long-term strategic decisions. |
| |||
| Quote:
Well, still waiting for someone to clarify/conmfirm this, but I beleive IBEC membership is fee based, and it aint cheap. No idea how much, but simple google found this IBEC application form3.4.indd note the reference to direct debit madate if subscription fee is less than 5k!!! Also subscriptions are deductable business expense, similar to union fees being tax deductable. Goes to show even more similarity between unions and IBEC, I've said it before, IBEC and unions, one and the same, leeches all!! Anyone who ok's tax deductions on union membership fees but poopoos the likes if IBEC subscritions i being tax deductable is a hypocrtye by the way. Also, IBEC are registered as a union I beleive!!
__________________ Anyone for desert ? |
| ||||
| Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Linking Social Welfare Payments to Cost of Living by Area | geraghd | Health and Social Affairs | 8 | 1st July 2009 06:50 PM |
| More scaremongering from IBEC | eurosceptic | Lisbon Treaty | 27 | 18th June 2009 04:15 PM |
| Welfare payments...benefits too generous? | Seán Mac Stiofán | Economy | 3 | 20th April 2009 11:46 PM |
| SIPTU slams call for cuts in social welfare payments | bormotello | Economy | 1 | 17th February 2009 03:23 PM |
| Social Welfare Payments into Bank Account | odie1kanobe | Culture & Community | 10 | 3rd January 2008 05:28 PM |
| |