Politics.ie
Advertise on Politics.ie

Go Back   Politics.ie > Topical Discussion > Economy

Hey there!

It looks like you're enjoying Politics.ie but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Joining Politics.ie is completely free. Register now!

Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

1200 Court Interpreters get pay cut €25ph to €18ph

This is a discussion on 1200 Court Interpreters get pay cut €25ph to €18ph within the Economy forums, part of the Topical Discussion category on Politics.ie. Originally Posted by TommyO'Brien You missed my point. A targeted salary reduction is not possible. But charges on one's salary, ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 29th March 2009
draiocht23's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyO'Brien View Post
You missed my point. A targeted salary reduction is not possible. But charges on one's salary, such as the levy, are, once they are not based on one's status as a judge, but one's status as a state employee. The reduction principle is also based on gross, not net. Put simply, saying 'We will reduce judges' salaries by 10%' is constitutionally impossible. Arguably, saying 'we will reduce a broad group of public service salaries by 10%, and judges happen to feature in that group', is. Similarly increasing the tax rate can apply to judges. Creating a special tax rate targeted at judges is not.
Ok, so I guess the salient point is this - why have the judiciary not been subjected to the pension levy?
Reply With Quote

Advertise on Politics.ie

  #12 (permalink)  
Old 29th March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 181
Default

Well if that reductions is in the pipelines that's a different case, but well with consent and the current climate it maybe be allowed if need be. goodnight.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 29th March 2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YesSireeeBob View Post
Interpreters in court pay row - Times Online

Lionbridge, the company contracted by the Courts Service to translate for defendants and witnesses who don’t speak English, is paid €46 per hour by the Courts Service for providing interpreters. This gives it €21 per hour while the interpreter takes home €25.

About 1,200 interpreters are employed to cover 175 languages.

The quality of some Lionbridge interpreters has been criticised by judges.

--------------------------------------------------------------

This multi-cultural lark is a cottage industry.

I wonder how many people it employs in total.
The Lionbridge contract should have been reduced by 15-20%, if the interpreters are unhappy with the rates they pay then take it up with their employer, 12 to 15 euros an hour doesnt seem like rock bottom wages to me. If they are unhappy with the wage rates they should leave ireland
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 29th March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ballybay
Posts: 693
Default

Judges are in their ivory tower on a different planet. They should volunteer the levy but fat chance of that happening. Too much brandy and cigars to be had
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 29th March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: on Aldebaran, safe on the green desert sand
Posts: 3,599
Blog Entries: 45
Default

Glenshane asks
Quote:
Why is the State paying for any interpreters? If people cannot speak or understand English, they should not be in the country?
Mon Dieu! Les Englais pissez moi off! Oui!
__________________

There are nights when the wolves are silent and only the moon howls.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 29th March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,617
Blog Entries: 1
Default

The Government has consistantly stated that the pension levy is not a pay cut. Therefore it should apply to judges and the President too.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 29th March 2009
Clanrickard's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Last outpost of freedom
Posts: 8,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by draiocht23 View Post
A lucid and intelligent argument. After all, everyone knows they do speech and language checks at customs.

I'm guessing you probably don't travel much Gelnnshane. That's probably a good thing.
Hahahahah! Nice one!
__________________
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 29th March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 178
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glennshane View Post
Why is the State paying for any interpreters? If people cannot speak or understand English, they should not be in the country?
It is completely unrealistic to expect all immigrants to have a level of English that would get them through court proceedings without any hiccups, from the moment they arrive.
I consider myself to speak French at a reasonable level, but there's no chance I could get through a court hearing without missing key bits of flowery legal dialect.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 29th March 2009
fool's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 384
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SJL4277 View Post
It is completely unrealistic to expect all immigrants to have a level of English that would get them through court proceedings without any hiccups, from the moment they arrive.
I consider myself to speak French at a reasonable level, but there's no chance I could get through a court hearing without missing key bits of flowery legal dialect.
It's also worth pointing out that plenty of foreigners in the coutry aren't immigrants. Many of them are tourists, or here on short business trips.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 3rd April 2009
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1
Default

Defendants who don't speak English have a legal right to an interpreter in criminal cases. Just think if you were on trial abroad even for something relatively minor like a traffic offence - believe me, you'd like to have the best interpreter available. Interpreters are also provided for witnesses who don't speak English. Would you like a case to fall because the witness cannot communicate?

About the rates - you have to remember that interpreters are freelance and guess what some are Irish. €18 per hour may sound okay compared to the minimum wage but interpreters have no guarantee of work. They are not entitled to holiday pay or to the dole and they make a very precarious living. They may have a good week here and there but that's amid a lot of bad weeks with maybe no assignments at all.

The key point in the Sunday Times article is that Lionbridge was asked to reduce rates by 8% but that became 28% for the interpreters. That's just Lionbridge shoring up their profits, nothing else. Why should interpreters suffer? They have a very responsible job.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eircom announce 1200 redundancies: RTE kerrynorth Economy 34 20th May 2009 03:34 PM
Outdated oath in court thetruth Justice 4 17th May 2009 11:31 PM
The Cornish go to court cornubian Europe 11 21st February 2009 09:46 AM
RTE: Growing concerns over future of SR Technics - 1200 jobs at stake Partizan Economy 0 11th February 2009 06:37 PM
US Supreme Court WyldeOne Foreign Affairs 22 5th October 2005 09:49 PM


Advertise on Politics.ie

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:21 PM.