Again, not true. He could accept dollars. Or yen. Or gold. Or goods. Or services. It's up to him to work out his own deal with the creditor. Isn't that the free market in action?

Because you were wrong in suggesting that there is a monopoly on currency?

They're all traits of capitalism, certainly. They're not the only traits of capitalism, however, and nor are those traits exclusive to capitalism. But do go on.

You really think someone could sequester your home and goods? Of course your property rights are protected. This is pretty much the last country in Europe that JAILS people for debt. Unless they're bankers, of course.

The state doesn't defend any contracts. You do, in a court of law. And if legal it will be upheld. You don't like paying tax? Diddums. Neither do I. It's a necessary evil, though, and it would be lower if it were not for the state bailing out zombie banks.

Get over yourself. We live in a globalised world. I probably do about 40% of my business via sterling, and more again in other currencies. I regularly engage in trades that involve no currency at all. I'd imagine the sum total of my interchange in euro currency would amount to a minority.
Get online, buy via the internet, shop up north, barter and trade. It's up to you. Hyperbole like referring to currency like 'violent monopoly' does your argument no favours.
Do you really believe that our currency system led to the current problems in the global economy?

__________________
Please sign the petition to establish a national day of celebration in honour of the vision of the United Irishmen!

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Language evolves. Nothing has been corrupted. I'm not changing any definitions. I'm working with the contemporary meanings of the words.

More madness. Well, at least we've identified that you're anti-democratic. That makes you marginally more honest than some of your fellow loons on this thread.

Oh, this is just precious!
The neo-cons were Trots! Has anyone told Dick Cheney? Or the Trots for that matter?

If you want to query his definitions, his contact details are there for you. His definitions seem distinctly more sensible than your own, where neo-cons are actually Trots.

Like not raping or murdering. I know, what terrible tyranny society is.

Elections are preferable. Me, I'd like a more Swiss version of democracy. But people often get the societies they deserve, I feel.

I'd have thought social justice was justice in the social context, as opposed to, say, vigilante justice.

Now who's making up definitions?

Okay, so to summarise, the neo-cons are Trots, and Nazis were socialists.
Do you realise how nuts you sound?

__________________
Please sign the petition to establish a national day of celebration in honour of the vision of the United Irishmen!

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I believe with a simple flat rate tax system we would be able to implement good left winged policies due to every worker contributing to the system.

But if offered Euros he cannot refuse.

....


It is violent becuase one is forced to accept € notes, and a monopoly in the sense that the State(s) grant the privilage printing of money and setting of interest rates to a central bank.

Yes, centrally planned artificially low interest rates and monetary expansion facilitated a boom and bust.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
¦
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

You still have to prove how the end goal of socialism is not communism, even using your terms.

Democracy is rule by the mob. You should read the article from LewRockwell I posted.

Try reading the article from antiwar.com

I am using the definitions of Nobel Prize winner FA Hayek. You posted the link to that fools website. Your attitude is very aggressive. I want to engage you intellectually but if you continue like this I will ignore you.


Capitalism is a system of voluntary transaction, private property rights and equality under the law. You are entitled to your liberties provided you do not aggress against others. What is illegal for the individual is also illegal for the 'government'. This is not the case under socialism. Socialism is the opposite of equality under the law. It is a philosophy of material equality. This is an impossibility because there is no method of rationally distributing resources without a price mechanism. Socialism over-rides the individuals rights to life, liberty and property and replaces it with lawlessness and chaos.



These elections create two classes, the rulers and the ruled once again. What if your favourite central planner didn't get elected? It is not the 'will of society' that one sees from the central planners under socialism, it is the will of the despot and the totalitarian because for society to function without a market there can be no dissent. Orders must be given and obeyed despite the individual wishes of the individual workers.

That's the point, social justice does not mean equality under the law. It is an Orwellian turn-of-phrase that camouflages decrees that rob from peter to pay paul.

FA Hayek, Ludwig von Mises and thousands of other economists apparently.
"To abolish private property in the means of production, to make the means of production the property of the community, that is the whole aim of Socialism."
Online Library of Liberty - 4: Collective Ownership of the Means of Production - Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis

You should really read that piece on socialism being totalitarian.

I expect a polite response or I will abandon talking with you.

__________________
Tu Ne Cede Malis Sed Contra Audentior Ito

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"The gold standard is the negation of slavery and the empowerment of virtue"
If voting changed anything they would have made it illegal.

Says who? I bought a bottle of whiskey off a lad last week. He wanted paying in sterling, as we were in the sterling zone. I offered euro, as I had them on me and couldn't be arsed seeking out an ATM. We haggled over the rate, struck a deal and both went on our way. No problem.
Equally, he could always set such a high euro price, if his euro-phobia was so acute, that people would prefer to pay him otherwise.

It is neither violent, nor a monopoly in the current globalised economy. You don't like the euro deal, go see out a dollar one. It won't be hard to find.

We've had boom and bust long before the ERM or recent low exchange rates.
This boom and bust was just another bubble market ponzi scheme.

__________________
Please sign the petition to establish a national day of celebration in honour of the vision of the United Irishmen!

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

How so? The distinctions are clear to all. I've already given you a series of succinct summations of the differences. It's not my fault if you still prefer to whistle the hoary old 'reds under the bed' tune.

I'm part of the mob. So are we all. Democracy is the best we've got. And the more of it the better. I'd like rule via referendum ideally. But I'd settle for the Swiss model. Like Socialism in Ireland, true Democracy has never been tried.

That's your best source? Thank you, but no.

I doubt I'll cry a river over that.

Or what happens? Oh yeah, your civil liberties are denied because your actions transgress society. Just like in Socialism.

Seriously, Eamon Gilmore might be under your bed RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!

That's not socialism. That's McCarthyist nonsense of the highest order.
If your favourite whatever doesn't get elected, suck it up. That's democracy.

How do you make that out?

You read some of the most disturbed websites I've come across. Would you not try a bit of porno instead?

Catch a grip. I wouldn't waste my time reading an article describing how Mary McAleese eats babies for breakfast either, because I can recognise tinfoil hat madness from a distance.

I know, I know. You REALLY better check under that bed.

__________________
Please sign the petition to establish a national day of celebration in honour of the vision of the United Irishmen!

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Legal tender - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Legal tender or forced tender is payment that, by law, cannot be refused in settlement of a debt.

Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 (3 May 1998)

Irrelevant to the point I was making.

No, if I am given € in payment of debt, I am obliged to take it. And claiming I have a choice in State currencies does not equate to a free market in currencies.


But where do people get the money to bid up resources from? Booms are always associated with monetary expansion - all the way from Tulipmania to today. Central banking, as well as the concept of fractional reserve baking are at fault here.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
¦
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

This thread should be on the political humour forum. What it does show is that the majority of people on this forum have no idea what the word Socialism means. Its understandable to an extent given the deliberate misrepresentation of the ideas of Marx, Lenin, Trotsky and others in our education system and the confusion caused by the Soviet Union, once a world power calling itself a "Socialist State" - the greatest oxymoron of the 20th century, but you'd expect a group of people who spend all day, every day shooting the breeze on a political internet forum to know better. Or maybe I'm giving you guys too much credit.

How can I put this? Government regulation, bank bail outs, even nationalisation, does not directly imply Socialism. Using taxpayers money to bail out capitalists is in fact an attempt to save Capitalism. Its been done many times before. After World War 2, Europe was in ferment. Progressive measures were taken all accross the continent by governments to quell this. Sure, there were nationalisations, free healthcare, free education and these were good things. But they were a far cry from Socialism. Even the Societ Union, before the Stalinist counter-revolution was not Socialist. Lenin never claimed it was. He described the infant Soviet Union as a Workers' State with bureaucratic deformations. A step on the road to Socialism he felt, but a far cry from it. It was Stalin who proclaimed that Socialism had been achieved, in the 1930's. A claim ably dismissed by Trotsky in The Revolution Betrayed.

If anyone is actually interested in finding out what Socialism actually means, and if it wouldn't spoil your fun too much, I recomend Lenin's "The State and Revolution" which along with many other interesting texts can be found at the Marxists Internet Archive

Its not that long ago that Bertie was berating Joe Higgins in the Dail, saying that if "his lot" were in charge, we'd be back to 1980's levels of unemployment. Well Bertie, who's in charge now? Ah I forgot, the country was grand when you left office!

I don't post much on internet forums on this subject nowadays because I spent years at it and it gets you nowhere with people who already have their minds made up but I did compile some of the main points I used to make on a blog I used to write - http://gripofhysteria.wordpress.com/...-or-barbarism/ For the more open minded among you.

__________________
The Communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development invloves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas – Karl Marx


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Hi Red,

If you are saying that the bank bailouts are to preserve capitalism, shouldn't you be arguing that they should not happen so that the free-market works as efficiently as possible until its ultimate doom and is not hindered and delayed by government intervention?

True Marxists should be against all things that hinder the free-market system like the minimum wage, the central bank credit inflation, social welfare, taxation etc in that case shouldn't they?

__________________
Tu Ne Cede Malis Sed Contra Audentior Ito

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"The gold standard is the negation of slavery and the empowerment of virtue"
If voting changed anything they would have made it illegal.