Politics.ie
Advertise on Politics.ie

Go Back   Politics.ie > Topical Discussion > Economy

Cowen's 5 years to correct state's finances politically unfeasible

This is a discussion on Cowen's 5 years to correct state's finances politically unfeasible within the Economy forums, part of the Topical Discussion category on Politics.ie. Originally Posted by markeys So basically another nod to the trade unions that FF will sacrifise the country rather than ...

View Poll Results: The State Finances - will everything be sorted in 5 years?
Yes 27 25.00%
No 81 75.00%
Voters: 108. You must be logged in to vote on this poll. Please login or register for free

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 6th January 2009
jpc jpc is offline
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In Cork like
Posts: 2,498
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markeys View Post
So basically another nod to the trade unions that FF will sacrifise the country rather than endanger themselves politically. Idiots.
They would soil themselves publically rather than make the decisions that are going to be needed.
We don't have five months.
The buffoon was blithely mentioning that we need to borrow up yo 20 billion the other day.
__________________
Its only a chat, we ain't the world council.
In 2000 the Women's Institute in Britain gave Tony Blair the slow hand clap to demonstrate their contempt.
It was dignified, restrained and effective.Doesn't Bertie deserve the same scorn. No shouting, no abuse, no agression just a relentless slow clap whenever he speaks in public would be enough to end that man's presidential fantasy.
If you agree copy the signature in to yours and lets get the whole country slow clapping Bertie.
Reply With Quote

Advertise on Politics.ie

  #22 (permalink)  
Old 6th January 2009
cyberianpan's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wherever I can see
Posts: 11,730
Exclamation

Politicians like grand, grand plans ... the grander the plans the greater the reflected grandness of the politician. The longer the term of the plan the more meaningless it is.

I've been involved several times in formulation of long term, complex (e.g. multi billion) plans - you can never put any useful detail beyond year 3 - things are just too uncertain - and indeed more than 50% of the change needs to occur in year 1.

Cowen's grand , grand plan is in fact a forecast - I've read all material to date and we've yet to see a plan.

cYp
__________________
"Yawn , am I alive yet ?"
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 6th January 2009
FutureTaoiseach's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nationalist Ireland
Posts: 30,902
Default

No. Even now, FF are fudging the issue and caving-in to protest groups.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 6th January 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junketman View Post
Cowen is grasping at straws, he doesn't know what he's at. Take the 'Smart Economy' BS. It's like the captain of a sinking ship saying he will save the passengers by building an aeroplane.

FF have been in government 11 years and only now they are talking about diversifying into IT, etc. Anyone would think Cowen wasn't at the cabinet table the last 11 years.

Cowen as minister for finance and Taoiseach has presided over the sinking of the Irish economy and has proved unable to save it. He has offered no leadership whatsoever. He has for example provided no incentive through short term taxation reform to encourage the creation and retention of jobs.

He has no economic philosophy from what I can see. At least Charlie McCreevy had an economic philosophy which encouraged job creation. Instead he sits on the sidelines and watches as everything crashes and burns and feels its not his position to intervene.

His raising of the VAT rate was a typical ill concieved knee jerk decision which has spectacularly backfired with people going up the north. The result is we have lost 2.5 billion in VAT, not increased the take.

I hate to say it but the guy is just to slow to react and not dynamic enough.
THe budget had the unimaginative civil service stamp all over it. It was bad enough to increase VAT tax which was already 4 percentage points higher than VAT in our next door neighbour NI and the UK,worse still was the timing of the VAT increase in a very rapid downwards recessionary spiral. Finance Minister Lenihan needs to get advice from a wide variety of sources outside the civil service clique.

Hopefully,Cowen and Lenihan will learn from their mistakes and there may still be time to provide strong leadership,assuming the public needs more time to understand the gravity of the state's dire financial situation.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 10th January 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dot View Post
There is no 'don't know' option on this poll, indeed, the last one I looked at
(about Hilary Clinton) did not have that option either. Is this a recession thing,
or a polarisation thing?

It's very cut and dried with no middle ground.
It's probably done on the logic that if you don't know you don't vote. This logic is faulty however, as people have an innate urge to push buttons if you put them in front of them.

As illustrated by YOU: http://www.85qm.de/up/BigRedButton.swf
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 10th January 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 5,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by patslatt View Post
Since joining the EMU,Ireland yielded control of monetary policy to Brussels,giving up the historic option of inflating its way out of budgetary deficits and excessive debt burdens. So the state is now just like a big business that has to balance its books. Leaving the Euro could be technically very difficult and considered only as the last desperate resort if the ECB imposed too harsh and humiliating austerity as the price for a bailout.

THe EMU brought a huge advantage of very cheap capital at very low interest rates but unfortunately the government let the economy rip on low interest rates when instead it should have been raising taxes to restrain unsustainable economic growth. Finance Minister McCreevey raised the stamp duty to about 8% on new commercial property but he should also have raised it to 20% or more on houses and eliminated all the tax incentives on houses except for depressed areas.

Even if it were politically feasible, what good would that have done? The whole country, including the opposition, were complaining that houses were too expensive. How would a 20% stamp duty have helped, even if the government could have ignored the screams of protest?

Employers were constantly complaining that their costs were too high; how would increasing taxes (while the opposition was demanding cuts) have helped the situation?

How would your policies if pursued, have left us in a better position today?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tax evasion and the State's finances. riker1969 Economy 27 5th January 2009 08:21 PM
Taoiseach: At Least 5 Years Before Gov Finances Recover Sierra Economy 30 3rd January 2009 08:45 PM
Politically not correct. CitiZenJonredux Political Humour 0 2nd November 2008 07:48 PM
5 more years: election frequency correct ? cyberianpan Elections 18 15th December 2007 07:57 PM


Advertise on Politics.ie

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:34 PM.