![]() |
|
| |||||||
This is a discussion on % of GDP misleading on government spending within the Economy forums, part of the Topical Discussion category on Politics.ie. Originally Posted by patslatt Is there a conspiracy on the political left to quote government spending figures as a percent ...
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Quote:
How does the Irish public sector compare internationally on a GNP or GNI basis, patslatt?
__________________ Nothing will motivate the lazy / apathetic / Americanised / west-British types to embrace their culture and the Irish language. |
| |
| |||
| Our spending as a percent of GNP is lower than the advanced EU economies. That doesn't mean it should be as high. The Irish political consensus is that tax should be kept low to attract inward multinational investment and skilled workers. As well, the Irish are still individualistic enough not to want a nanny state to run their lives. |
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ Nothing will motivate the lazy / apathetic / Americanised / west-British types to embrace their culture and the Irish language. |
| |||
| Someone mentioned the famous quote 'statistics, statistics and damn lies'. I have to say the current miscalculated stats mentioned recently has to do with VAT and the .5% increase in the higher VAT rate. People are saying it will translate into a price increase of .5%. Thats not true. The end price should only increase by .413% because the .5% increase is only applicable to 79% of the selling price. Im listening to retailers complain that they will have to either increase prices by .5% or absorb the VAT increase through reduced profits. Either way they say it will hurt them. But its only .413% increase. I know that the difference is less than .1% but if people want to make a big story of .5% and assign great importance to factions/decimals then I think it is only right to highlight that the .5% VAT increase translates into an end price increase of .413%. example: An item sells for 2500 Euro. That is inclusive of 21% VAT. Thus the base price is 2500/1.21 = 2066.11 Euro. An increase in VAT of .5 sees the VAT rate now at 21.5%. Thus the new selling price is 2066.11 x 1.215 = 2510.33 Euro. But its been quoted in the media and by retailers as follows: 2500 x 1.005 =2512.5 Euro. This is wrong because the the VAT increase is applied to the pretax price but also the inital VAT amount. When really it should be 2500 x 1.00413 = 2510.33 Euro. Its only a small difference, but really those people show know their maths better. |
| ||||||
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
. Quote:
. Quote:
Quote:
__________________ Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues. George Will |
| |||
| Quote:
It is analogous with his earlier claims that the findings in the last OECD report on the Public Service are flawed as it uses GDP instead of GNP as the comparative metric. However, as has been pointed out, the consensus contained within the report is still valid using either.
__________________ Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues. George Will |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to cut a fifth of government spending like Canada | patslatt | Economy | 44 | 14th July 2009 09:06 AM |
| ICTU accused of misleading analysis of Irish wages and public spending | patslatt | Economy | 52 | 21st February 2009 05:50 PM |
| Should we raise government spending rather than cut it? | LowIQ | Current Affairs | 19 | 31st October 2008 04:38 PM |
| Capital spending to be hit in Government cutbacks: SBP | kerrynorth | Economy | 2 | 26th July 2008 08:19 PM |
| Government spending and economic growth do not add up! | kerrynorth | Economy | 7 | 20th October 2007 12:00 PM |
| |