Politics.ie
Advertise on Politics.ie

Go Back   Politics.ie > Topical Discussion > Economy

Hey there!

It looks like you're enjoying Politics.ie but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Joining Politics.ie is completely free. Register now!

Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Government spending and economic growth do not add up!

This is a discussion on Government spending and economic growth do not add up! within the Economy forums, part of the Topical Discussion category on Politics.ie. We have been hearing ad naseum since before the election that the government were going to prioritise spending on infrastructure, ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 19th October 2007
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: KERRY
Posts: 11,683
Default Government spending and economic growth do not add up!

We have been hearing ad naseum since before the election that the government were going to prioritise spending on infrastructure, however, the figures presented yesterday tell a different story.

Yesterdays figures allow for a 4.8% increase in spending leaving circa 3% for additional spending an budget day, or E1.5billion in money terms. Even a social welfare package that would be less generous than the most recent E1.2billion package of this year will still cost you would imagine E0.8-1billion. Leaving E500-700million at most for all other spending on all other government services and capital priorities on budget day. My guess that they will only have E500million to play with on the day meaning an overall spending increase target limit of 7.5%.

On the capital side overall spending announced yesterday would fall by 1%! Even if extra social housing or transport spending were to be announced on budget day it would only be a very minor increase in the overall scheme of things and there will be other spending pressures on budget day not the least in Health where the 5.2% increase published yesterday implies possible cutbacks in reality rather than accounting for the notional existing service level when medical inflation is allowed for. Therefore, health spending you would imagine has first call on the bulk of the circa E500million available on budget day through various initiatives that get announced on budget day such as waiting list initiatives etc.

What all this means is that there is a serious disconnect between the basis upon which economic growth figures were based upon and the actuality of government spending. All the economic commentators including the ESRI factored in a big ramping up in capital spending next year to take up the slack in the construction sector from the ongoing collapse in the residential sector. However, these figures demonstrate that this is not going to happen!

I have been saying from a number of months ago that I reckon we are in reality looking at a growth rate of circa 1% next year with a significant risk that this may be optimistic with the gathering international clouds and the economy losing circa 25k jobs rather than the 26k gain forecast yesterday. All the indicators coming together are increasing coming closer to my assessment.
__________________
Seabhcan on EU Enlargement and the Lisbon Treaty: "There is no shortage of cheap labour - Turkey isn't needed."
Reply With Quote

Advertise on Politics.ie

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 19th October 2007
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,572
Default

I cant believe you still havent committed suicide.

Anyhow, good post.
To take up the slack for the falling housing completions, significant capital investment was needed, as you say yourself.

From your figures, no evidence of it.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 19th October 2007
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: KERRY
Posts: 11,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by meriwether
I cant believe you still havent committed suicide.
I'm waiting for Brian to give me a buzz and we could both go together!
__________________
Seabhcan on EU Enlargement and the Lisbon Treaty: "There is no shortage of cheap labour - Turkey isn't needed."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 19th October 2007
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 664
Default

Could you flesh this out and provide some figures. What amount did you think the government said was going to be spent on infrastructure and what amount do you think will now be spent ?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 19th October 2007
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: KERRY
Posts: 11,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supamolli
Could you flesh this out and provide some figures. What amount did you think the government said was going to be spent on infrastructure and what amount do you think will now be spent ?
I have just spotted something. The original allocation for capital in 2008 was set last December at E8.3billion, this has been cut to E7.6billion in yesterdays pre-budget outlook, however, there is also a new provision of E1billion in an "unallocated NDP" heading. This is a first, this never appeared in finance accounts before. Therefore he is allowing for an additional E300million in capital spending on budget day although he is going to make it look like it is an extra E1billion by only announcing where it is going on budget day. Smoke and mirrors!!!

I also see in the detail that he also based his growth figures on the basis of low 60's housing completions next year. We all know that this is unrealistic. I have been saying for months that it will not exceed 50k which cuts his growth forecast from 3% to 1.8% and if you take the CIF's more pessimistic 45k projection then it falls down to 1.2%! Therefore, you can very quickly see how talk of 3-4% growth rates are really wide of the mark.
__________________
Seabhcan on EU Enlargement and the Lisbon Treaty: "There is no shortage of cheap labour - Turkey isn't needed."
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 19th October 2007
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 576
Default

Maybe KN there will be a surge of activity in the rope industry. It'd take a fair oul bit of hemp to take Biffo's weight.

KN can please you see my post on the link where Smashey and Nicey say that the rate of house price fall is reducing and give your considered opinion on my comments on the S23, S50 Reliefs etc and how the market might "readjust" i.e. fall when the rush to buy them is over on the 31st October?
__________________
"I'm not a member of the establishment" B Lenihan BL, T.D., Min for Fin, Son of Fmr Tanaiste Nephew of a fmr Dep leader of FF and min and brother of a Jun Min. Bertie made the Sheeple happy.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 19th October 2007
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 664
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kerrynorth
Quote:
Originally Posted by supamolli
Could you flesh this out and provide some figures. What amount did you think the government said was going to be spent on infrastructure and what amount do you think will now be spent ?
I have just spotted something. The original allocation for capital in 2008 was set last December at E8.3billion, this has been cut to E7.6billion in yesterdays pre-budget outlook, however, there is also a new provision of E1billion in an "unallocated NDP" heading. This is a first, this never appeared in finance accounts before. Therefore he is allowing for an additional E300million in capital spending on budget day although he is going to make it look like it is an extra E1billion by only announcing where it is going on budget day. Smoke and mirrors!!!

I also see in the detail that he also based his growth figures on the basis of low 60's housing completions next year. We all know that this is unrealistic. I have been saying for months that it will not exceed 50k which cuts his growth forecast from 3% to 1.8% and if you take the CIF's more pessimistic 45k projection then it falls down to 1.2%! Therefore, you can very quickly see how talk of 3-4% growth rates are really wide of the mark.
But you agree we can still see Cowen ensure there is an increase in capital spending in 2008. In fact we are looking at 30 billion being shelled out in the next 3 years. That is certainly enough investment to take up some of the slack.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 20th October 2007
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: KERRY
Posts: 11,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theyshootPDsdontthey
Maybe KN there will be a surge of activity in the rope industry. It'd take a fair oul bit of hemp to take Biffo's weight.

KN can please you see my post on the link where Smashey and Nicey say that the rate of house price fall is reducing and give your considered opinion on my comments on the S23, S50 Reliefs etc and how the market might "readjust" i.e. fall when the rush to buy them is over on the 31st October?
What thread?
__________________
Seabhcan on EU Enlargement and the Lisbon Treaty: "There is no shortage of cheap labour - Turkey isn't needed."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Economic growth - an axiom? Christel Economy 24 31st March 2009 11:38 PM
Economic growth like a cancer? Akrasia Economy 12 23rd November 2007 06:43 PM
Farmers and economic growth rockofcashel Economy 14 23rd May 2007 12:01 AM
Spending slowdown to hit growth jjcarroll Economy 5 28th April 2007 07:14 PM
EU economic growth outrunning US St Disibod Europe 14 26th January 2007 03:09 AM


Advertise on Politics.ie

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:36 PM.