Well, this will be seen to validate everybodies position I suppose.

A) The evil Goldman Sachs like Nama therefore no further proof is required as to Nama's rotteness.

B) The venerable Goldman Sachs like Nama therefore no further proof is required as to Nama's suitability.

Take your pick.

Top Goldman Sachs economist praises 'impressive' Nama - The Irish Times - Wed, Sep 23, 2009


The report is attributed to GS's cheif european economist, based in London, Erik F. Nielsen.

Aside from Nama the appointment of Patrick Honahan has gone down very well:

Goldman Snakes are evil. Say no more about NAMA.

__________________
Do you remember,writing in your diary,Freedom is the freedom to say that 2 plus 2 make 4?'.Yes,said Winston.O'Brien held up his left hand,its back towards Winston,with the thumb hidden and the four fingers extended.How many fingers am I holding up,Winston?.Four.And if the party says that it is not four but five,then how many?.The needle went up to 60 How many fingers,Winston?'Four!Stop it,stop it!How can you go on?Four!Four!'How many fingers,Winston?'Five!Five!Five!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Wow! Its true : Sociopaths DO recognise their own.

Have Goldman Sachs a vested interest in NAMA? Do they have a direct vested interest in NAMA? i.e. Do Goldman Sachs advise NAMA or act as advisor to the government on any of the NAMA banks?

__________________
The future saviour of the Irish Economy:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

is this rhetorical?

Nope. I honestly couldn't recall. A quick search suggests they are not directly involved.

__________________
The future saviour of the Irish Economy:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.